Experts: The Western world is fragmented to provide good opportunities for other countries

The famous European topic expert, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences academician Jiu Yuanlen researcher speech China net Woody took December 24, 2009 Morning "2010 World Economic and international Situation Report and 2010 World Economic Yellow Book", "International Situation Yellow Book" Press release "　　2010 World Economic Situation analysis and speculation and global political and Security Report (2010). Academician Jiu Yuanlen, a leading European expert, said at the press conference that 2009 was a year of relative decline in western strength and influence, but I thought the descent process didn't start 2009 years ago, and we can go back to around 2005, It can even be traced back to the break-up of Eastern Europe and the collapse of the Soviet Union, which was the cumulative result of 20.　　I think that in the course of these 20 years, especially in the last 5 years, the Western judgment of the situation has made three more serious mistakes, which led to its results today. The first mistake, Jiu Yuanlen said, was that after the break-up of Eastern Europe and the collapse of the Soviet Union, Western capitalism danced and thought it was their system's last triumph. Since then, Western capitalism can be free to play, the development of freedom. But in some ways, I thought liberalisation was overdone, especially in the financial sector. In this area, large amounts of credit are lent to companies, individuals and families that simply do not have debt, resulting in a severe financial crisis.　　The impact of the financial crisis is far-reaching. The second mistake, which clearly underestimated the significant consequences of economic globalization. In the 1989, the break-up of Eastern Europe, the disintegration of the Soviet Union, economic globalization has a true meaning of globalization, the original globalization is the western word. In this case, about 20 years of the so-called new and old topics, China, India and so on, 20 years old and new topics, as these countries almost all embarked on the market economy development Path, all of a sudden participate in the global economy and other aspects of competition. The impact that this competition has had on the West is not very well estimated.　　In China, the rapid development in the 30, I think it is and Marx said the land, capital, labor and other factors of production activities and their effective combination of the resulting. Jiu Yuanlen said that everyone was surprised that, before 1979, China's land, labor, capital and static activities, and 1979 onwards, the activity is very strong. The activities of the land have brought huge income to the government, so that the government can do a lot of things. Labor activities on the one hand to the farmers to provide labor positions in urban employment, on the other hand, to many entrepreneurs to provide opportunities for further development. International capital activities have created a starting point for China's economy. The result of such an activity I thought that when the West began, its familiarity was not enough, the competition for the West, the products of China, the products of other emerging countries, the products of the 2 billion new labor, the competition for the West and their estimate was not very good. Capital activities brought about by the consequences of their many businesses and even the whole industry part of this toTheir influence is very large.　　In the global economy, 1989 has a real meaning, its impact and consequences are very large. The third mistake, they have done in this period of things a little complacent, carried away, and did not fit, adapt to the new situation in the world trend of development. The United States has done three things in 20 years. The first thing, enjoy life. The second thing is the imposition of liberal democracy. The third thing is to start a few wars. The Iraq War, the Yugoslav War, the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq in 2003 made Americans exhausted and now in a dilemma. Europeans have done three things, the first is the enlargement and deepening of the EU, has far-reaching strategic significance, but also bring a lot of difficulties. The second thing is that they are making a lot of rules and trying to push their rules around the world. There is no success in this matter. The third thing is that Europeans are too preoccupied with the pursuit of quality of life. They attach great importance to the small animals in the Arctic Ocean, and this kind of thing takes too much energy and the enterprise is not very strong.　　This view also leads to a rebuttal, which I feel. Jiu Yuanlen said that the West is doing their own thing, and did not adapt to the trend, such a situation for the outside world to provide a good opportunity for development, we have to catch good development opportunities. In this case, I think we should note that the West is already familiar with the problems in this field and is already rethinking it. Finally, it is time for the emerging countries to judge the situation correctly, which is the key to their success in the future. (Fan)