Give the Ark a jury seat.

If there is no ark, it is difficult for domestic people to know the authenticity of scientific research information in Canada, including the domestic authorities who give the counterfeiters academic status, and how much can they understand? Or is it possible to dispose of it properly after knowing? The answer is not clear.　　This time, the Ark is so accustomed to fault, the opposition of the supervisor is very necessary. According to the Beijing Times, Fang, a famous counterfeiters, posted a message yesterday on Weibo that China's "thousand-person program" winner, Wang, was shut down at the University of Montreal's Institute of Cardiology for two papers. In this respect, Wang himself admits that the images used to illustrate the data in the revoked papers have errors in the synthesis, and the remainder of the paper includes accurate conclusions.　　But the University of Montreal is concerned about the picture "how it was manipulated". The so-called "thousand-person scheme" is the abbreviation of "Overseas High-level talent introduction scheme". China plans to introduce 2000 scientists and leading talents to the country from 2008, with 5-10 years of national key innovation projects, key disciplines and key laboratories, central enterprises and state-owned commercial financial institutions. August 20 last year, Heilongjiang province to selected national "thousand People Plan" of 9 experts to grant funds, in addition to the central subsidy of 1 million yuan per person, Heilongjiang province to subsidize 500,000 yuan per person, including department fourth batch of "thousand people scheme" winner of the Wang, he is the first health care industry in Heilongjiang Province innovation category "　　thousand people plan to introduce talents. It is not the first time that a famous scholar like this has been found to be a fraud. And by the people of the civil fight against the Ark is not the first time, it is difficult to imagine, if there is no ark, the domestic people are difficult to learn in Canada, the authenticity of scientific research information, including the award of the academic identity of the domestic authorities, and how much can understand? Or is it possible to dispose of it properly after knowing? The answer is not clear. This time, Ark is so accustomed to fault, the devil's advocate is very necessary, why not give ark such person a serious errand? For example, the high-end project selection of an alternative judge seat?　　In order to make a major project in China before the approval of a major title before the award, a little more questioning and exploration. Now the problem is, similar to the "thousand-person plan" such as the establishment and evaluation of high-end academic projects are closed door experts responsible for the selection and the selection of many teachers and students, colleagues, even friends, acquaintances relations. A project, after a name is obtained, not only does it mean that academic research can be carried out, those who are related to this project will have a qualitative change in title promotion, position improvement and even salary income, therefore, the necessity and urgency of acquiring the project has far exceeded the purpose of the study, which is almost a way for a researcher to establish itself. This is difficult to avoid in the selection process inadvertently even deliberately neglect or even conceal, such as the Wang so far away from the situation of the understanding, and how much power is also unknown. In this context, as in the case of Fang, and the interests of scientific research, or even to make a living,Outsiders in the industry are easy to keep objective, if they can choose a way that suits them, involved in the selection process, will certainly create the selection process of "trouble", "contradictions", but this "trouble" and "contradictions" is bound to clarify the scientific research process can not tolerate the "secret", not only to avoid the embarrassment of being exposed after the election,　　What is more important is that the state invests heavily in scientific research funds, not to be spent in the hands of dishonest counterfeiters. Tong Tong Share to: