How did the big data age disappear on the internet?

&http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/37954.html ">nbsp; Who has the right to be forgotten on the internet? No one can say it for the time being.

For many people, big data is not such a good thing. Although there is a change of information every minute of the Internet, stale information does not disappear, it stays on the web, and as long as there are search engines, the information is readily available to others.

In May this year, the European Union ruled that Google must give Internet users "the right to be forgotten", that is, if the user applies, then Google should delete the users do not want to leave the Internet content search results.

What is said here does not want to be left on the Internet content, including both the user's own brain fever in the online statements, but also include other people or institutions to the negative evaluation of someone. Luxembourg's European Court said: "Ordinary citizens have the right to be forgotten on the Internet, in their view this is a way to protect privacy."

The actual operation was not as easy as imagined.

Since May 29 this year, Google has received a total of 500,000 delete link applications, of which about 2/5 of the people have successfully deleted their own time because of the folly of the mistakes made on the internet. France, Germany and Britain are the three countries with the highest percentage of successful applicants. The source of the site is Facebook ranked number one, YouTube is second-the proportion of social networks is so high, probably because most people can't stand the mistakes they made when they were young.

Google says it will also selectively accept applications. One person, for example, asked Google to delete the search results of a bulletin page he had previously dismissed for sexual assault, but Google refused. But Google deleted a link for the court to convict him for another person because he had pleaded guilty to plead.

But even if Google has made the screening, there are still many organizations that are quite dissatisfied. Of course what they are dissatisfied with is the right to be forgotten itself, but Google, which actually deletes links, has become a target for attack.

The first is that criminals can get away with this loophole. A senior British official said there were now thousands of paedophiles who would escape punishment for the policy because the police simply couldn't monitor the information on the Internet. Keith Bristol, Director-General of the National Crime Bureau, said that 50,000 people would visit the children's photos every year, but the police were helpless.

In his view, Bristol has described "forgotten rights" as "disgraceful policies", which, in his opinion, have given the children to those who are dangerous and have long been exposed to restrictions. "This has created a challenge for us. "he said.

Secondly, it is also against the spirit of freedom of expression to delete others ' speech. Many public groups, particularly the press and publication agencies, are dissatisfied. In this, the BBC should be the most dissatisfied with Google's media organizations. The BBC says 46 articles have been removed from the Google search results since May, one of the most controversial is the post published by Robert Peston, the BBC economic editor, and the reason why the article disappeared in the search engine was simply that a netizen commented on the post and regretted saying it, and then Google submitted its application. "It's like walking into a library and burning a book you don't like." MailOnline publisher Martin Clark said.

The BBC and the Guardian have suggested that Google should seek out their professional news organizations as "forgotten rights" advisers, shortly after the May implementation of the right to be forgotten, Oxford University ethics philosopher, former German minister of justice and Wikipedia's boss, Jimmy, formed a " "The right to be forgotten" Advisory Committee. Although Google chairman Eric Schmidt has sat down with them several times, the change is not obvious from the current results.

Now, all of the deletion applications are handled manually by the staff, who will judge and review whether the application is reasonable. Mr. Schmidt said he felt it was impossible to automate the job.

Who has the right to be forgotten on the internet? No one can say it for the time being.