How do you say your pros and cons during an interview?

Http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6983.html "> Job interviews, interviewers often ask a question:" Please say a few words about your strengths and weaknesses. "For this problem, the network is popular with a lot of answer strategies, some of the new workplace directly apply," their strengths and weaknesses to recite fluently. In answering such questions, avoid rote memorization and respond to specific job features.

About the advantages

The interviewer asked the candidate this question for two purposes: first, to judge whether the applicant has truly expounded his merits. Second, the candidate's stated advantage is the quality of the position.

Preparatory work:

(1) Find out their own 3-5 advantages before the interview;

(2) For each advantage to find a few examples, preferably from the study, work and life, such as three aspects;

(3) Among the 3-5 advantages, the advantages of one or two are selected and the best match for the position.

About Disadvantages

When expressing shortcomings, we should combine the actual and select those who do not obstruct the interview, and strive to turn the shortcomings into advantages.

When you talk about personal flaws in an interview, you can follow these principles:

1. Frankly admit, win identity if it is their own shortcomings, the best way or frankly admit it. There is no point in disputing your own shortcomings, but it is important to make others emotionally agree with you about your own shortcomings.

2. Eliminate misunderstanding, narrowing the gap some of the "shortcomings" is not a shortcoming, but the general sense of misunderstanding caused, then you should promptly clarify, narrowing the psychological gap with the interviewer.

Case：

A job seeker from a cadres family to an ordinary unit job interview, he introduced himself when said: "My father is cadres, but he is very strict to me, although the family has a nanny, but washing clothes and other housework never let Nanny help me do, but let me do it personally." Because I grew up in this environment, everything is done by myself, never rely on the father's authority, so to your unit, how much pain, I can eat. ”

Born in cadres family, may be mistaken for "can not endure hardship", but the candidate from his father to his strict requirements to start, talk about family background views and their attitude to life, so that the interviewer understand that they have tasted bitter, can endure the excellent quality. In this way, he shortened the distance with the employing unit, making the enterprise feel that it is the material that can be made.

3. The pros and cons of talking about shortcomings sometimes the interviewer will ask the job seeker some scathing questions: "What are some of your weaknesses or weaknesses in doing a job?" Some job seekers repeatedly shook their heads and answered no, and some job seekers blurted out: "My weakness is that I am very lax, I do not want to be disciplined," or to answer some of the fatal flaws in a job, it is a cry. This kind of job seeker, which enterprise dares? On the contrary, some people's response to the interviewer amazed, they do not hide, nor straightforward, but combining the common weaknesses of the new workplace (such as lack of practical experience, shallow social experience, etc.), contact the professional development trends (such as the knowledge structure is not very reasonable, Expertise is not enough to deal with new challenges, etc.) and flaws in their own personality (such as excessive pursuit of perfection, pioneering spirit is not enough, or too much of the pursuit of efficiency, cautious, and so on, said some of their own are overcome and can be corrected some of the weaknesses, talk about the gap between the ideal and the reality, that the surface is flawed in fact, a job beneficial to the personality , which embodies the virtues of humility and studious, and answers the difficult questions head-on.

Psychological research shows that there are three states of interpersonal communication: One is authoritative, the other is rational, and the other is impulsive. It is more necessary to be sensible in an interview, and reason is to be fully prepared and thoughtful, not childish. A person has a flaw is not terrible, terrible is not dare to admit it, correct it, but not to admit. From a dialectical point of view, the shortcomings and advantages can be mutually transformed, the premise is to correctly understand the shortcomings, really correct shortcomings. "Cross as the ridge side into the peak", for the disadvantage itself, some "shortcomings" for a certain kind of work is precisely the advantages of the people with shortcomings, whether to eliminate misunderstanding or frankly admit, will make negative evaluation into positive evaluation.