How does professionalism grow healthily

First of all, the professionalization here is not "grinding yourself, getting rid of individuality, becoming more tactful", and so on, but rather something that everyone should do in their careers, even more important than professional skills. After all, professional skills can rely on interest, the pursuit of learning from my urging, promotion, and professionalism is more by mentality, habits, and generally rely on others to find, put forward, and self-improvement to obtain progress skills.

Responsibility

When it comes to responsibility, it will inevitably involve "broadening the scope of work", but in fact the structure of the Internet companies, or more specifically, some entrepreneurial companies, each role requires versatile: Facebook requires designers to have full front-end skills, can write pages, achieve high-fidelity model and so on; Independent designers abroad, everyone is from the copy, design, marketing, to front-end development, even including backstage development of all the players, Taobao's ued team's role requirements are mutual infiltration; how many founders of the company are technically born? Business, design, development, sales one person?

What is responsibility? products are their own. Once also in the company group YY: each product on the line after all of the people involved in the release, users want to curse also directly to find people, also summed up the "product to get the standard is that every participant will be with friends or relatives around the recommendation or show off." Regardless of your role: a good developer will do the design and implementation of the system while fully understanding the business. Even in some links with the designer or product manager to explore the rationality of business, design fluency; product designers will participate in the discussion at the beginning of the demand to ensure that the product "from the root is right", Combing the process with the actual logic of the business logic, or improving efficiency or even system efficiency, or reducing the cost of implementation; no more.

The end result of a product cannot be guaranteed by a person of the same deity, but it must be the result of the team. If the development classmate does not care about the business just requires that all logic be sorted upstream is just coding (of course, the good designer is afraid and will take the initiative to complete this link), if the product manager does not care about the operation just want to produce products and then throw to the operation to fend for themselves, What is the ultimate result if a designer is only concerned about the nature of interaction and design without considering the cost of implementation and the outside limits?

Can trust

Can trust and authority are linked, and the ability to solve various problems with the individual is also linked to, what is trustworthy? To you one thing, you can rest assured to do something else, know you finally give the results will be, and do not have to worry about every day to ask. Why authority people are authoritative? Because of the trustworthiness, the result of doing things is trustworthy, the feedback given is trustworthy, and the time node of commitment is trustworthy.

Feedback and propulsion

The profession must involve all sorts of people to deal with the matter, the feedback and the advancement avoids, guarantees the feedback and the advancement result is "the initiative". Initiative good person, will give you the feedback actively, meet the initiative bad person, initiative good person will take the initiative to follow up and advance. Although there is a lot of information about the Yu Shivi reverse, however, it is important to admit that many of the first Yu Shivi from the "win in execution", "effective communication" learned too much until now still very useful ways and habits (remember that time every day at least 3 hours on the road, the bus light is not good enough to read, So I have been listening to Yu Shivi lectures. As a professionally good person, if the project cycle is long, it will feedback the progress at the critical node, feedback the intermediate product, and communicate with each other to ensure the correctness of the result. Similarly, as a good professional, will be in the middle of a task, in the middle of continuous advance and ask progress, to ensure the correctness of the direction, Grasp the quality of the intermediate key points, identify milestones and so on.

A case

In fact, this case is not used to demonstrate professionalism, but I think it is also related to professionalism (the American doctors are accused of, spit out the Chinese medical environment ...)

Believe it or not, the risk of a doctor being accused of a mistake has little to do with the number of mistakes it makes. An analysis of malpractice lawsuits suggests that doctors who have been prosecuted are skilled, while some of the most porous doctors have never been complained of. At the same time, the vast majority of people who have been injured as a result of medical malpractice have never filed a medical malpractice lawsuit. In other words, the injury caused by negligence in medical care is not the only cause of the patient's prosecution. Patients are prosecuted because they have been violated and there are other reasons.

Not long ago, medical researcher Windylevinson recorded hundreds of conversations between a group of doctors and their patients. About half of the doctors in this group have never been complained of, while the other half have been complained twice or more. Levinson found that with these dialogues alone, she was able to identify the obvious differences between the two types of doctors. Doctors who have never complained have spent 3 minutes (18.3 minutes more than 15 minutes) on each patient than the doctor complained of. The former tends to give "guidance" explanations, such as "First, I'll check for you and then we'll talk about your questions, or" I'll set aside time for you to ask questions "that will help patients understand what they will get in the clinic and when to ask questions; , like to use the phrase "Please go on," and in addition, they are more humorous and playful in the patient's treatment process. Interestingly, both types of information provided to patients were similar in quality and quantity, and the first doctor gave no more details about the medication and the condition. The difference is just how the two doctors communicate with the patient.

Ask yourself a question, of course, for the sake of fairness, we should agree to have two technical ability level of doctors, then you will prefer which one? Is this communication skill or measurement a doctor's professional or professional skill?

In addition: Meet the professionalism, high quality students, please be thankful, study, please do not become the person you hate ...