Is Chinese style management effective?

Recently, Chinese-style management is very fashionable and enthusiastic, Chinese-style management is more suitable for growing Chinese enterprises? is Western-style management more suitable for growing Chinese companies? Or is it more suitable for Chinese-style management? This becomes a problem where there is no need to differentiate and to set a concept. Chinese-style management is a pseudoscience, outdated concept.　　How to understand this problem? As a Chinese and foreign enterprises have worked in the managers have some experience and share.　　1, what is the enterprise?　　To understand the Chinese style of management, first of all, do not overlook the premise, we are talking about the management of enterprises. What do we need to know about business? The performance of an enterprise is a group of people working together. This is only a form, not an end. And the Chinese-style management of the "business itself has no purpose", "Corporate organizational function is: aggregation of people, synergy" This is not from the purpose of speaking form. What is Enterprise?: The world's top management guru Peter Drucker, in his management practice, pointed out that "the enterprise is to adapt to the changing needs of customers." Only the customer, the purchase of goods or services, so that economic resources into wealth, goods into goods. Under this important and unique premise, it is not very important for an enterprise to produce anything. It is not important that a company is a group of people. And what customers want to buy, what is their cognitive value, that is decisive. They decide what the business is, what the enterprise produces, whether it thrives.　　And in the Chinese-style management advocates enterprise as the first element, ask insiders Ann, their own business people like, enterprises but let customers do not like, the existence of enterprises what is the significance of with, Mao Yan? Only with a clear purpose can we discuss the way. 2. Standards for the development of enterprises and the role of leaders we extend from the previous point of view, the purpose of the enterprise is to modify, expand, develop existing, continue to operate the development of enterprises. And our management has to begin. The standard for all our work is how to mobilize all resources (including: human, financial and material) around the unfolding. If we do not focus on enterprise development, according to the Chinese style management master's remarks: Enterprise management is only to embody the "repair of the personal value of zhiping" This is a personal cultivation is not a business, according to the "Master" speech, Enterprise function: "Is the aggregation of people, synergy" This is the cart before the horse, is the matter rather than. Some people with management experience understand that enterprise development, full of changes to adapt to customer changes, enterprise development, all need internal organization personnel. Adapt to change, be good at self innovation, but it is difficult to achieve coordination of all, at this time the organization leaders need to clear goals, set a standard. To develop action steps, And then the flag. This is not enough, but also to reward, necessary to eliminate the development of personnel. And we just for the sake of "the people" "Satisfaction" "Datong Hopewell", the enterprise is in fact unable to do, also impossible to do. The development of enterprises must be swift and effective. And paying too much attention to people's feelings. Will pay a great cost, at the expense of enterprise's development speed andIn exchange for, even at the expense of the existence of the enterprise.　　There is no business to talk about. The role of a leader: to be a leader in a business. We must cherish people, help people, and deal with people well. But these are not enough. In fact there is always a leader in a successful business organization who doesn't care about people. does not help people. Also do not deliberately with a good relationship. He is cold, unpleasant and demanding, but he often has more talent than anyone else can produce. He earned more respect than others. He has set high standards and expects people to meet this standard. His judgment is on the wrong person. Weigh people with things.　　Do not use everyone's feelings as a standard of action. Such leaders are truly productive leaders because they have real character.　　3. Is the world economy becoming more integrated, and can it distinguish between Chinese-style or Western-style management? Today's world is a global village. The maturity of information technology, and the great fusion of culture. We can see the younger generation more open and world trend, can see eating McDonald's, watching Korean dramas, using the Internet, the use of global unified working language and standards. We want to see the environment changed, you walk in a busy city center can you tell if this is country? Nowadays, the radius of people's living environment is getting bigger, and the people of different countries are becoming more and more similar with the exchange of economic activities, and the enterprises of today also have their own regional and management types. It's completely outdated. LBM's Global Service center in the United States is located in India, Chinese enterprises-Huawei has more than 900 foreign employees, to preach the Chinese-style management of the "master", what they want to take the management of the style? On their Chinese-style management? Are they going to take it? For their completely western style, Chinese employees are hard to balance,　　How to balance the performance of the enterprise, which violates the "master" and repeatedly advocated that the enterprise must be "coordinated and common"? From the "master" of the hometown of Taiwan's trend of science and technology. Financial headquarters in Japan, sales headquarters in the United States • Research and development headquarters in China, Development center in Malaysia, for such a fully international enterprise, has set up six headquarters in the world, do not know what type of management. Trend Technology is a company of only 23OO, annual sales amounted to 500 million U.S. dollars, the market value of 6 billion U.S. dollars. During its 6-year period, it maintained a sustained growth, listed in Japan in 1998, the Nikkei 225 index in 2002, and two years later the Dow Jones Stable Growth Index, the world's only more than 300 stocks. Zhang Ming, the CEO of Trend Technology, is attributing this power to internationalization, in the management of Cross-border management, Zhang Ming is also pointed out that "if not from the beginning of the trend of science and technology to establish a strong corporate culture and a unified normative management model, to attract national elites to join and agree, I think such supranational organization is difficult to maintain." "4, my management experience the author has been involved in a domestic and foreign joint ventures in the process of change." This is located in the longDelta Enterprises, a joint venture with a domestic state enterprise, at that time, China is familiar with this industry, but also has a cadre team, the foreign party from the cooperation and convenience, began the enterprise mainly by the Chinese cadres management, resulting in management confusion, serious losses, and then, there are foreign contracting mode of operation, to Taiwan companies to send cadres. Communication is easy to communicate, but the actual business communication costs too much, the main operators spent a lot of energy to do management communication, but also spent the financial resources to meet the management of the cadre housing requirements, the result is a demand for the satisfaction of the new requirements of the continuous generation, excessive pursuit of people and, and delay the development of enterprises. The company continuously loses for eight years, the main shareholder in a endure endure again, the capital completely loses the condition, let me dominate this has fallen into the trough enterprise. The author accepted this enterprise, immediately set the rules, the troubled times with heavy, strengthen management, to the Cadre team: Listen to understand, can understand and can do reuse. It's not understandable, but it's also good to perform. But it cannot be tolerated, that is, what is more unwilling to do. Through the efforts of more than a year, the enterprise has made great strides, and through a few years of management team's ability, the enterprise has now entered the forefront of the industry.　　Enterprise management is the emphasis on practice, any concept, can not make practice will only destroy the management of enterprises, in vain. Now, the proposed Chinese-style management, just do not understand the business management of another concept of self speculation, the author has been management of Taiwan's enterprises, this theory, in Taiwan has no market, recently in our business management industry is in need of vigilance. It is very dangerous to take the Buddhist and Taoist self cultivation instead of business management. The author of Nature does not object to the experience of the leaders, but not the absolute equivalent of the enterprise management.