is the picture really suitable for disease diagnosis?

Absrtact: Why do you suddenly think of this topic? The mobile internet has brought a more rapid and convenient mode of inquiry for telemedicine, both text, pictures and video, expanding the medical material and breaking free from the constraints of the original space. A more typical example is the most

Why do you suddenly think of this topic? The mobile internet has brought a more rapid and convenient mode of inquiry for telemedicine, both text, pictures and video, expanding the medical material and breaking free from the constraints of the original space.

A more typical example is the first purple medical treatment with skin diseases, as well as the diagnostic methods based on television or other screens that go into the family.

This also makes many people question, face the different filming environment, or for those who do not know the medical knowledge of patients, the picture is really suitable for disease diagnosis?

There is no definitive answer, but you can use the example of Federal Trade Commission mini-advertisements Commission to explain what conditions apply to picture diagnostics, or, in clinical terms, the entrepreneurial team should pay attention to various evidence to explain the explanation, Do not overdo propaganda efficacy, health or medical care, is the clinical or theoretical need to make clear.

This time, the FTC has been able to detect early melanoma of the start-up companies to do instructions and fines, that they deceive consumers, violated the relevant regulations.

MelApp is an app that specializes in detecting melanoma, priced at 1.99 dollars. The basic usage is to use a smartphone to take pictures of moles, and to enter basic information about moles, and by using the scientific algorithm of image recognition, app can tell how likely it is to have melanoma.

The ads and promotions even claim to be able to pinpoint and analyze the risk of illness and help locate early disease. But when the FTC asked the team for relevant scientific evidence, the results were not ideal. The team was unable to give a precise description of what theory and experiments were based on its own app, nor did it give the results of human clinical trials, and the team had to pay a fine of 17963 dollars.

Of course, the first one-on-one medical consultation on any app in China is defined as light counseling, there is no prescription right and there is no certain medical dispute accountability, but with the legal provisions of the perfect, any treatment means as long as the user's life and health and medical diseases, we must follow a certain standard, give the corresponding accurate proof, This big trend will not change.

Athelas, who had received YC recognition, used cell morphology, claiming that taking pictures of the blood could diagnose parts of the disease, such as chronic diseases, cancer and even Ebola.

But doctors and experts have questioned the fact that Ebola, for example, may not have had as many viruses in the blood as could be tested in the early stages, causing unnecessary suspicion and panic.

A positive example of 23andMe (not a picture) had been banned by the United States FDA and was later approved by a series of experiments and evidence of its Bloom syndrome gene carrier test.

At that time, 23andMe gave two different academic studies to prove the correctness of their tests, the first based on 70 completely different samples from two laboratories, including known disease-carrying genes. The second was to test 105 samples in two identical laboratories.