Network Exposure 1th Shop staff leaked customer information consumer shadow still

Once asked the No. 1th store Chairman Gege: "Shop 1th what is the most important?" Gege then replied: "User experience." "How far is the distance between store 1th and this pursuit?" At the end of May last year, the network exposed 1th shop staff inside and outside collusion leaked customer information, 900,000 of the user information has been sold at a price of 500 yuan. Some consumers soon encountered the account balance was stolen, phone fraud and other issues. Although Saturday, vice president of Shop 1th, then apologized to consumers and promised to upgrade the process and system to ensure the security of user information. But in the question of consumer compensation, store 1th is still being questioned as "insincere". "Store No. 1th has not been to the user that some users of the loss has not been compensated." "The first person who exploded the game was a member of the" China Public Relations Association, the founder of the Wang Penghui marketing Plan ", told the law weekend reporter. In this respect, the reporter calls 1th shop to inquire, as of press, the other party has not given a reply. Consumers are still in the shadow of "those who are leaking information are at any risk of being cheated." @ The kicker said, "Unfortunately, shop 1th doesn't even have a minimum of reminders." "@ Get kicked to tell a reporter:" Encounter that information leaked person too many, 1th store's president Gege and don't take this as the matter, the following people naturally will not pay attention to. "I was very silent after I heard my message leaked out." Li Ping (a pseudonym) said. As an old customer in store 1th, Li Ping was also a "recruit", but she was lucky enough not to encounter too much trouble. Phillips (a pseudonym) is much worse than Li Ping. Phillips said she had bought something in shop 1th before, and that the incident had been going on for almost six months, but she was always getting a baffling call, even knowing her name and address, and claiming that she had bought something at shop 1th. "Because there is no substantial loss, also embarrassed to go to shop No. 1th to claim." Li Ping reluctantly told the law weekend reporter. Many netizens in the sun out their pain, but also to store 1th information security questions, and hope that the other side can "give a statement." Information disclosure incident at the end of May last year, a "sale of 1th stores 900,000 member information" news, almost instantaneous aroused widespread concern. "The person who buys and sells 1th stores member information has contacted me once, each other said the data that sells is true and reliable, all is from the backstage of shop 1th's website to get out." @ the kick says. Then someone contacted the seller who was selling the user information to the @ kick. The seller said that he had 1th stores up to July 2011 900,000 full field of user information, including mobile phone, order Amount, address, mailbox, etc., the price is 500 yuan. The man also claimed that his price was already very cheap and would not be so cheap if it was not in urgent need of money. He even said he could make inquiries, compared to other sellers out of the 3000 yuan to 5000 yuan price, the price has been very cheap. Store 1th information leaked events for a time uproar. Immediately, some consumers received fraud telephone, number 1th store account balance stolen and so onProblem。 and store 1th's approach to the incident was also questioned at the time. Many consumers in the subsequent shopping process found that their accounts have been frozen for no reason. Some consumers have received a text saying: "Hello, because of the 1th shop system upgrade, found that your account security risks, please log in to store 1th as soon as possible authentication and account thawing." "No. 1th Store has the right to freeze my funds without authorization?" "It's very confusing to consumers who have frozen accounts. In addition, it was reported that shop 1th had thrown a solution to some of the stolen users: that is, to agree to pay the stolen balance, but the user must sign "on the receipt of the confirmation letter of Shop No. 1th." In that letter, it was said that store 1th wrote, "I am strict in the confidentiality of the above matters, without the written consent of No. 1th Store, will not disclose or provide any third party with any relevant information, such as breach of the above agreement, I will return to shop 1th all advances, and agreed to pay the equivalent amount of liquidated damages. "Did no. 1th shop ever put forward this" overlord clause "? The rule of Law weekend reporter calls the company, the other side did not give a reply. Shanghai Municipal Public Security Bureau Network Security Corps has revealed that at the end of last year has been seized 1th shop online mall staff and turnover, external staff and internal collusion, resulting in some of the customer information leaked a case. Police said 11 people have been controlled by the Public Security Department, the investigation of the case is still in progress. According to the rule of law weekend reporters understand that shop 1th thus carried out the internal comprehensive inspection, the system, process, authority has been cleaned, upgraded, and set up ethics management department, reporting telephone and other ways to standardize and manage the professional conduct of employees. However, a few days ago, still said that the 1th store on the information disclosure incident is not in place, so far there are still many consumers have not been due compensation. For the incident of leaking personal information from the electric dealer similar to shop 1th, Wu Jingming, a professor of the Institute of Economic and Commercial law of China, said to the rule of law weekend reporters: "To solve similar problems, we must first from the legislative point of view, so as to continuously increase the punishment, and the legal responsibility of the "He said," can be based on the extent of information leakage, the extent of harm and damage to the parties, the final determination of the penalty criteria. ”