Reading "News broadcast" and "Weibo" are very helpful to investment

Before the microblogging epidemic, we were living in "CCTV News", and when Weibo became an important part of our lives, we had two worlds that looked completely different.　　Like the changes that have taken place in every field in the past more than 30 years, China has always been divided into two worlds, which are very different, even often antagonistic. In popular cognition, the identification of urban-rural duality has never been lost because of reform. The price double track "Once Let the middleman center to obtain its profit, the enterprise is divided into the state-owned and the private sector; In the late 90, with the" Down tide ", the difference between system and system became more and more obvious. In the new century, in the last ten years,　　These contradictions have been called "official and civil confrontation".　　So, some people simply point out, want to see "official" to "news broadcast", want to understand folk, on "Micro Bo". The reality is far from simple.　　Despite the distance between the "news broadcast" and "Weibo", but they have one of the most important things in common--they are the most extreme representatives of both official and civic discourse, and they are always speaking to each other through exaggerated propaganda and performance, hoping to eventually find a balance between the two sides. For most people, Weibo is a lucky star.　　Folk, the long-term lack of reliable sound tube of the sad situation has finally changed; in the official here, Weibo has a nasty side, but at the same time, Weibo also helps officials understand the distance with the opposite, doing things to more easily grasp the sense of propriety. Why are you talking about this topic? After talking to a lot of investors, I've noticed that more and more investors are reversing their judgment that they were once controlled by the news broadcast through Weibo.　　To my great inspiration, some of these successful investors have been able to discern clearly the difference between the two worlds and find the right mentality. I would like to say that I seriously agree that "smart investors" are a group of people who are good at seizing opportunities and controlling risks. They are unwilling to make decisions and prefer to "vote". The vote itself is the choice, obviously, if let them choose "news broadcast" or "Weibo" of any party, can't get their "vote".　　Fortunately, the Chinese thing really happened somewhere between the two, and smart investors told me, "The trend is OK, the event is driven." This is the strategy, but you have to choose the direction. There are many directions, one is to get better, one is to turn bad downward; another is from the "news broadcast" to "micro-bo", another is from "micro-bo" to "news broadcast."　　I understand that if you choose the upward direction, a lot of negative events will bring you short interest and vice versa. Speaking of which, perhaps you will ask me to make a choice of direction. I'm a little embarrassed because it's really risky to tell you exactly what I think. However, I would like to say that I will choose the upward trend, that is, between the "news broadcast" and "Weibo" will indeed develop a form of transcendence, in the words of many foreign observers is a "China's strange political system."。 It is clear that the reforms that began 35 years ago have made China a "monolithic" of economic, social, political, ideological and even cultural and artistic and civilian life, as "two blocks of thought and behaviour based on considerable common ground".　　When fission occurs, natural collisions will occur and the collision will transform each other. I am not afraid to assert where the transformation will take place, but I am well aware that there are quite a few things in common between the official people.　　For example, the people want to "get rich" to a great extent, the state also want to, the people want to gain dignity, the country also want to stand in the world, the people want happiness, the country also wants peace. Therefore, the destruction of wealth, mutual mutilation, unrest of the society is not the best choice for both ends of the official people.　　In this country, there are so many wise people, and over time, the solution to one problem after another will always be found. I have noticed a phenomenon that in the various rounds of change that has taken place, the people who walk in both ends of the "civil system" are often more successful.　　Some people may criticize me for being vulgar and speculative, but I would like to say that I still see a lot of good conscience and conscience, at the same time I can play and take advantage of the advantages of the two systems of successful people. In fact, in my opinion, it is they, not only their own success, but also greatly contributed to the civil system inside and outside the interaction, the formation of a new society to add momentum. So for you, either become them or invest them.