Second instance of the infringement of fan's right to fame

"Fan has called the right to reputation infringed claim 5.2 million" tracking the newspaper (reporter Zhang Yuan) painter fan sued collectors Guo Qingxiang, Wen Hui xinmin Joint Newspaper group Honorary infringement case, the first trial sentenced two defendants to appeal, yesterday afternoon in a Chinese court to hold the second instance of the talks, both sides on the fan whether there is an assembly line painting to start a heated debate.　　The two defendants appealed for May 2010, Guo Qingxiang in the "Wen Wei Po" published articles, did not name the comments fan had assembly line painting, and in the text used the "can be Flat", "Hero", "Hyun-so" and other words (this newspaper reported April 23).　　Fan sued that the article is arbitrary, accusing, using insults, derogatory, caustic language, directly attacking their character, artistic ability, painting methods, creative intent and the price of works, violated his right to reputation, so put forward more than 5 million of the claim. Before, Changping Court first trial verdict Guo Qingxiang to fan written apology and compensation for spiritual damage comfort gold 70,000 yuan, Guo Qingxiang appealed.　　Changping Court also decided that Wen Hui Group of published articles did not strictly review, there is a certain fault, but its behavior is not enough to constitute the fan infringement of reputation, the group's appeal that has done a strict review of responsibility. Guo Qingxiang held "press conference" yesterday 14 o'clock in the afternoon Xu, the lawyers of both sides came to court as promised.　　5 o'clock in the afternoon Xu, Guo Qingxiang lawyer out of court told reporters, both sides on the fan whether there is a pipeline painting launched a fierce debate, currently only waiting for sentencing.　　Subsequently, Guo Qingxiang to the reporters at the scene held a small "press conference", said that the main reason for his appeal is to confuse art criticism, academic contention and reputation infringement of the boundaries, and his own article did not insult fan's personality, "right or wrong comments should not be too harsh." For the first instance of the court did not determine whether there is a line painting fan, Guo Qingxiang said "feel regret."　　In this connection, fan's lawyer said that because the case is still in trial, so do not want to comment too much.　　Fan did not respond to "water painting" before, Guo Qingxiang once said in the studio of fan see, fan will be a dozen rice paper hanging on the wall, to the flow of the method of operation of painting, each sheet of head painting, and then add clothes, finally hastily tidy up some writing, by his students seal.　　At the first trial, Zhao, manager of a gallery in Dalian, had testified as a witness to the Guo Qingxiang party, saying he had seen fan in the studio in 1995. In this respect, fan's lawyer Li Jingfang has said that fan I have never been referred to the assembly line painting did respond. Share to: