Seoer You really think these theories are useless?

Absrtact: Do SEO is also a very fastidious work, in the first contact with the author of SEO knowledge, I have heard predecessors warned novice do not do these useless things: such as false original articles, low quality outside the chain, do not worry about Google's PR value and so on. Author

Do SEO is also a very pay attention to the work, in the first contact with the author of SEO knowledge, I have heard predecessors warned novice do not do these useless things: such as false original articles, hair low quality outside the chain, do not worry about Google's PR value and so on. I also firmly remember these words at first. But after a period of time of SEO actual combat, I can not help to these ineffective practices have questioned: these practices are really useless to SEO?

After a number of optimization experience, the author finally realized that, in fact, these three practices are not completely useless, on the contrary, if the use of good, SEO work can be said to have the role of a powerful, what is the truth, the following by the author for everyone to explain it.

Refute one: The false original article cannot bring the value to the user

Content for the king, as seoer we will certainly this conclusion, indeed, the value of a website is the content of the site, if the content of the site is valuable, this site can get search engines and users of the recognition, but the content of the value of the need for our original? is false original content worthless?

The author uses an example to overthrow the original value theory. Now there are a lot of seoer are updated to update, they think, as long as their own handwriting is the so-called original can make the site appear valuable, so every day desperately update some and the content of the site is not related to the so-called "original", such as the author just took over a website:

This is obviously an eye hospital website, but update these unrelated articles, ask such original may bring to the user real value? On the contrary, the false original article is not necessarily not to bring the user value, many times, the user needs is not necessarily an article has not been seen, they do not need to appreciate the original and literary writing, They just want to see an article to help them, we can completely according to the needs of users, to some authoritative web site to collect some articles, and then appropriate pseudo original or add some of their own point of view, and guide users to come to browse, this can also bring real value to users.

Retort two: Low quality outside the chain to rank worthless

Although Baidu algorithm many times outside the chain has been hit, but it is undeniable that the role of the chain on the site is still very large, especially for the new station, access to high-quality outside the chain is likely to rise to the position of the former. It is this kind of thinking guide, let many seoer think, to do outside the chain must do high-quality outside the chain, low quality chain is useless.

I also agree with this view, do more high-quality outside the chain is indeed very useful, but the quality of the chain is not good to do, time-consuming and laborious, many times do not necessarily achieve the desired effect. is the low quality chain really worthless? We all know that the so-called low quality chain is some pure text outside the chain, nofollow links, jump links, and so on, these outside the chain because can not directly transfer weight can not directly upgrade the ranking, is seoer considered to be worthless outside the chain. The author denies this view, the reason is very simple, we do not only to improve the chain of ranking and do, more time should be done for the flow. These outer chains, though very low in weight, but if we do well, and can be properly published on the relevant platform, so that the flow is absolutely very considerable, and low quality outside the chain to do a simple, of course, can not be too rampant, as long as appropriate to do, will be able to bring more direct traffic to the site.

Counter three: PR is not worth seoer attention

We all know that the weight of a site is the measure of Baidu's BR and Google's PR value, the larger the number, also shows that the weight of the site, and now, Google quit the mainland, Baidu became the domestic search engine boss, led to a lot of seoer the PR value to see worthless, But the size of the PR value is really not worth our attention?

I think, although Google withdrew from the mainland platform, but the role of the PR value still exists. We should know, in fact, the so-called Baidu weight br value is a lot of webmaster tools based on the site estimates, Baidu did not admit that it has the so-called weight BR value, but the PR value is not the same. We can find that some domain name time is long, the website content and the outside chain Weight high website, PR value is also quite high, but the BR value is not necessarily high, this is enough to explain the PR can accurately represent the authority of a website, and the value of Baidu's BR, many new stations as long as do some hands and feet, can also achieve a high BR, So in contrast, we should pay more attention to the PR value

The above three so-called useless theory in the author's eyes are very useful, as long as seoer understand reasonable use, these theoretical methods can also effectively improve the site's traffic and ranking, but also to make your SEO work more efficient.