Why is there no jobs in China?

If China doesn't take the time to change the culture again, most of the people we now educate will be able to innovate, not because they don't have the intelligence, but because they don't have the guts to subvert it, and they don't have the environment and the system.

Cheng Wan's culture can't be innovated.

In fact, there are many people in China who will not even be inferior to jobs, but if the size of the market, China's internet and it market is now absolutely the world's largest market, but why we do not have jobs in China?

In my opinion, the core of jobs is certainly innovation first, but in Chinese culture, innovation is hard to accept. Because innovation may mean a higher probability of failure, but in the Chinese culture, we are really afraid of failure. We worship success, and despise failure, fear of failure. So the result is that everyone is copying others, let others go first, and then we follow, so that looks the most insurance. And we all seem willing to go with the flow, like a piece to do things, like a piece to do group buying. But innovation means you have to do something that no one else can think of, so it must be a minority, and endure loneliness and ridicule from others.

I think jobs can get a lot of Chinese approval today, or because Apple has the highest market capitalisation. This is the same as the Government's GDP standard. It is impossible to pursue innovation without changing this culture. Many of our entrepreneurs just want to make money, earn a lot of cash, and not like Steve Jobs, want to create an unprecedented thing to change the world. Jobs's starting point is very different from ours.

Chinese companies do not have innovation in themselves, more through plagiarism, monopoly, and then suppress the strength of the new, so I do not doubt that there are some municipal and highway companies in China's Internet.

Even if Apple is not as high as it is today, I still think Apple is great. A man who is so innovative as Steve Jobs has a short list of strengths, and there are certain drawbacks to that, and the problem is that we only look at the side of Jobs ' merits. Can our culture tolerate people with such obvious flaws? Can you tolerate his straightforward way of speaking?

When Chinese entrepreneurs develop, they hide their corners and wrap themselves up. But after his great success, Jobs did not disguise himself, he did not live for others, not deliberately. He competes with cancer, competes with his original success, and competes with the original failure. He is straight, so many people can't stand it, but I think it is a real person, although he is sometimes bad tempered, dictatorial, like a tyrant. This is a disadvantage, it can be said to be a feature. If he does not care, put everything loose, may not be so good for the product, but to make the world's best products, you have to nitpicking.

Can you be a maverick?

Our culture is also opposed to being maverick, opposed to being different, and thinking that innovation is 250, because you're not doing what everyone is doing. We care too much about other people's proposals, and each of us lives in the judgment of others. But innovation means that you have to see more than others, insight is better than others, most people can not understand, when the evaluation may be completely negative, or do not understand what you mean, at this time you can withstand this pressure? Can you be a maverick?

China's current values are a pragmatic value, or unified values, is to control you cheat, as long as sales, good income, like many local governments as long as GDP development is good.

A country is the same as a company, and cannot make unified standards. This GDP is meaningless because it pollutes the environment, wastes energy and destroys non-renewable resources. If a company is only measured by numbers, then everyone will copy, because plagiarism, cottage, copy the most convenient.

For those innovative but unsuccessful enterprises, they should recognize their value as well. America worships this self-made hero. Our values do not change. Today, a company to do a lot, we tend to his icing on the cake, but in fact, innovation often comes from small businesses.

We always dislike challenges and subversion, in fact, innovation in the United States means that small companies to subvert large companies. Apple always plays the role of challenger, but challenges in our culture tend to be aggressive and seem to have nothing to do. Spoilers and spoilers are all derogatory in our culture.

If China does not take the time to change the culture, most of the people we educate will have no creative ability, no intelligence, no courage to subvert, no environment. A few slip through the cracks may also be killed in the process of growth. China lacks entrepreneurial environment and entrepreneurial culture, if there is such a culture, coupled with such a large market in China, so many smart people, I believe that there will be jobs.

How to guarantee innovation in system

The Chinese run innovative High-tech companies, basically from the United States to take money. The entrepreneur team size is very small, only a group of people, in the domestic materialization of the environment is not taken seriously. In Silicon Valley, ideas are so much more creative that people are willing to invest as long as they are recognized.

When we go public, the actual profitability is not very good, but to the U.S. listing, what others need is future growth. Chinese listing is the approval system, not the market to determine your good or bad, is determined by a few people. The U.S. listing is easy, as long as you can find underwriters willing to help you sell stocks, investment funds are willing to buy, finance through the audit of the four major accounting firms on the line. This is encouraging for innovation.

In the United States, there is also a benefit of international convergence, access to a world-class capital market recognition, to help international business development, including international competition and cooperation. Although our gem has made a lot of company packaging listed, but does not really solve these entrepreneurs need to solve the problem. What we prefer to do is icing on the cake, and what entrepreneurs need is a timely relief.

American banks will not lend to innovative companies because there is nothing to mortgage, so this kind of enterprise development must be backed by VCs. American VCs are already very mature, they recognize and respect the entrepreneurial team, such as investing a lot of money to be a small shareholder. China today a lot of rich bosses heard that investment is very hot, take some money to vote, cast the thought that this enterprise is his, to control the enterprise. Such a lot of things, behind the reality is the social values and cultural issues.

Zhou (Chairman of Qihoo Company) dictate