Why Larry the billions of legacies to Musk?

This March, Larry Page, at the TED conference, said that if he died, he might hand over billions of dollars to the CEO of Elon, the new energy car company. It seems paradoxical and brutal to give money to a billionaire, not to the hungry Third world, and to Africans afflicted by AIDS and Ebola. If you look at your predecessor, Bill Gates, how can people get 95% of their wealth to solve the problems of the poor and the sick, rather than giving the rich the icing on the cake? Hum a buzz ... A noise. ▲google founder and CEO of one of the world's most influential technology entrepreneurs, worth 23 billion of dollars first to restore the situation. The fans consulted some of the information there are 3 points to note: First, page did not object to charity (Charity), that is, he did not offend the way Buffett and Bill Gates disposed of personal assets; second, he made it very clear that a successful enterprise is of great value to society, In particular, science and technology enterprises, they often have great changes in the goal of providing employment, and to the community as a whole to bring great benefits. In this scenario, Larry Page believes that those who are striving to achieve a higher goal (trying to accomplish big stuff) deserve to invest in their own personal assets; Finally, Larry Page thinks that some people think the business is evil is more one-sided. If an enterprise is 20 years old, it may be evil; but those who aspire to revolutionary change are not. The latter is also an act of fraternity (philanthropical). ▲ Buffett, Melinda Gates, Bill Gates joined hands in philanthropy in recent years so, we first cut out some of the assertions that we had, such as Larry Page, giving money to billionaires and opposing philanthropy. Fan/teslahead that the rich (New money) of Larry Page, the former Carnegie or Warren Buffett, has a huge difference in dealing with personal wealth. In the same place: they all agree that money will be paid back to the world. Life does not bring, die without, everyone is to help God to carry a bag of money. Do what you want to do, earn money, realize self-worth, then let the money from the pool back to the world, make the world more in line with their own will. They think it's worthy to spend money on a Swiss bank account like a public servant. The difference is that there is a different way of giving back to the world. Buffett and Bill Gates are willing to use their money to bridge the rift in the world, the restoration of human dignity and equality; While Larry Page, a new generation of rich, is involved in the rise of the new economy, especially the global redeployment of Internet technology, they think the world is at a critical point of change, where money is used to help business firms overcome barriers, The realization of technological and commercial change will benefit all mankind. Like, the invention of electricity and the invention of penicillin, fuZe all mankind. When Larry Page explains why he donated money to Elon Musk, the reason given is that Tesla's new energy car and the Martian immigrants SpaceX are doing are well worth the effort. The fans believe that the new rich and the old rich in the same great moral (fraternity) tradition. But based on different experiences and world views, they choose different ways, and charity and donation to the poor is as great as the great cause of humanity. ▲ from the age of 12 years, until the death of 87 years old, she never for herself, but only to endure the suffering of the people alive; she is Mother Teresa (1910~1997) both, this can not be judged by the high and low. For a starving child, a mouthful of porridge is the world. For humans who stuck the earth, every time the Rockets launch, they see the dawn of life. Mother Teresa, who had been a lifelong charity, helped countless Indian poor people, but could not help them out of poverty; Mr Armstrong, who spent taxpayers ' money and left a line of footprints on the moon, opened up the entire human dream of outer space. That's it.