From the developer's perspective:
How many LinuxProgramPersonnel, learning things are not outdated for N years, and the salary is n high;
How many windows programmers are behind Microsoft, and tens of thousands of Microsoft employees are constantly upgrading their products for their own benefit. what you learned today will become obsolete tomorrow, programmers are exhausted by a large piece of news from time to time that programmers are exhausted;
From the consumer perspective:
You cannot run the latest software released by developers without paying for hardware upgrade or Windows upgrade. Can you run mainstream software on the market if you use Windows 98? I do not deny that the upgrade is appropriate, but it should not be so frequent. You can spend the same amount of money every several years on hard disk memory CPU and so on. You can buy products that are several times faster than the original hardware speed or capacity, is the Windows OS greatly improved? Why is it upgraded once every two or three years?
Yes, windows once made undeniable contributions to computer popularity. I would also like to say that xx also contributed a lot at the beginning. What about now? Are you still angry ?!!