Today, my Weibo reply, about China's knowledge-infused education and foreign knowledge-guided education

For the text in, I have some comments below the diagram.

On Chinese education, I do not think that knowledge indoctrination is wrong, different people are suitable for different ways of education, in accordance with their teaching.

Some people can do this kind of thing, some people are suitable for another kind of education mode, these should be differentiated, but not the same method to educate all children, similarly, the foreign education way also has the child which does not adapt, perhaps these children are more suitable to do the knowledge indoctrination rather than the knowledge guidance.
If you find your child unfit for creative work, it is no shame to be an ordinary worker. Everyone should find their interests and their own suitable to do, otherwise, are rigid and rigid education.

Simply saying that one kind of education is better than the other, which in itself is a rigid educational thinking, how it can lead to a truly child-friendly way of education!

In addition, in fact, each person at different stages, in a certain knowledge of the different stages of cognition, also need a different way of education, such as the need for some stages of knowledge infusion, some stages need knowledge guidance. To treat the same child or yourself in a single way, your way of learning and education is also wrong. The same can not achieve the best results.

Some people say that the basis is the premise of analysis, well, it is not reasonable to steal, said the premise of the future is more appropriate, it should be said that the premise is composed of two parts, one is the knowledge base, the other is analytical ability.
In fact, the former may not need to remember, the key is to have an impression, know how to find, when needed, and this is precisely the latter can provide, so, partial one is not.

Today, my Weibo reply, about China's knowledge-infused education and foreign knowledge-guided education