A tax starting point argument a bit of a deviation

China's Ministry of Finance announced 17th, "China's personal income tax basic Situation" report, the public outcry. Although the Ministry of Finance said in the report, according to economic development, consumer spending, market prices and other changes, the future tax starting point will also be adjusted in due course.　　However, the judgment that "the High income group benefits more and the interests of the low-income groups will be impaired" after a substantial increase in the starting point has caused numerous controversies. The report, written by the Ministry of Finance's personal income Tax research group, said that higher income groups benefited from a significant increase in the tax threshold, and that the interests of low-income groups would suffer.　　In accordance with the method of calculation of the report, if the deduction standard is raised to 10000 yuan/month, the taxpayers with a monthly salary of $5000 will benefit only 175 yuan/month, and the taxpayers with a monthly salary of 100,000 yuan would benefit 2800 yuan/month. The report uses a professional calculation method to express a simple truth, that is, low income people pay 1 yuan, high earners may be less than 10 yuan or even more.　　So, in order not to let the rich less money, then, the poor must also bite the teeth, holding the "I would rather be poor, also do not let you rich" mentality, the bitter haha to entertain themselves. This statement seems to be very warm, all for the sake of low-income people, although feeling quite a bit helpless.　　However, the majority of low-and middle-income people do not appreciate this, from the Internet forum to scold a sound can be seen. Yes, "medium and Low" refers only to wage income, does not include IQ-the same amount of money, for different income groups, the "marginal effect" is not the same, such as the 100 Yuan allowance, for the monthly income of more than 8000 yuan people, may be dismissive, but for the monthly income of less than 2000 yuan,　　It's just a small number. In addition, according to the National Bureau of Statistics, 2000 yuan after the levy, the number of working-class taxpayers accounted for 30% of the total number of workers.　　In this context, the adjustment of the starting point to $3000, or $4000, has nothing to do with the 70% of the working-class people. Therefore, the middle and low income people can only care about their own 1 yuan can be less, which still have time to pay attention to the rich are also more than 10 yuan. Besides, even if the rich pay more than 10 yuan, how many of them will eventually be Chiri? The Ministry of Finance's report contradicts a lot of contradictions: if the benefits of low-income groups are impaired if they are raised, how do you explain the statement that the tax-starting points in the report will be adjusted in due course?　　If the rise in the levy point is really detrimental to the interests of low-income groups, does that mean that to protect the interests of low-income groups, the tax starting points should not be raised and should be lowered? I have to say, the report actually diverts attention, the adjustment of the tax starting point does not actually solve the main contradiction in the society--the gap between rich and poor is too large, and this contradiction can be resolved only through the reform of income distribution system and the income of low-income groups. So, the heated debate "3000 dollarsThe starting sign or the 5000 yuan sign "has no practical significance."