Experts say property tax or rent rise in Guangzhou as soon as next year

Experts: or to rent up the yesterday, Beijing CPPCC member Liu Huan said commercial real estate already has the conditions to levy a property tax, Beijing is expected to lead the levy. Many experts pointed out that if the levy will greatly change the purchase of home buyers expectations, it is likely to make office buildings, shop rents increase.　　Some experts said that Guangzhou will soon levy a property tax next year. Or push up commercial property rents at present, the high price of commercial housing, some shops, offices and so gradually become investors "heart good."　　According to Ms. Zhang, who lives in Liwan District, one of her friends recently bought 10 shops, devoted to investment.　　Many industry experts have pointed out that once a property tax is levied on commercial properties, the rents of commercial properties will be pushed higher while the investors who have been transferred to commercial property in the past year have stalled again.　　Chen Yang, deputy director of the Department of Marketing Communications, said that commercial real estate levy on the residential market cooling does not have much effect, and may even be the commercial apartments under pressure to further improve the housing prices. Does levying a commercial property tax have any impact on the buyers of commercial property?　　Chen Yang said that this depends mainly on the high and low tax rates, if there is little impact under 1%, if more than the same period of bank deposit interest rate, will directly affect the return on investment, return too low will allow investors to withdraw from the market, the commercial market of practical buyers will tend to dull.　　Shoven, director of the research department, said the levy of a commercial real estate property tax will greatly alter the expectation of home buyers, especially since last year investors who have transferred to commercial property in the context of a persistently high level of housing prices may consider the cost of owning multiple sets of commercial properties, not excluding commercial properties. Guangzhou does not have the imposition of conditions in Guangzhou commercial real estate will levy property tax?　　The industry has mixed opinions. Chen Ruipeo, a state commercial real estate, said that commercial real estate in Guangzhou was not mature enough to levy a property tax, if the property tax is to be levied, the commercial value of each region must be clearly defined, and it cannot be judged by retail shopping malls, professional markets, commercial district streets, etc., and secondly, the relationship between real estate tax and property tax,　　The actual situation of personal use and renting. Shoven said that once Beijing Levy commercial real estate property tax, from Guangzhou and other cities to levy the date is not far. "I personally think that the fastest levy of the property tax in Guangzhou may be next year."　　Chen Yang, deputy director of the Department of Marketing Communications in China, said commercial real estate levy property tax has become a conclusion, the introduction of the time will depend on the government's social pressure and less, also do not exclude the government may appear step situation, first directly to the residential property tax, and then the commercial real estate levy property tax.　　How to levy the property tax of commercial real estate? Chen Yang, deputy director of the Department of Marketing Communications, said that the levy of property tax can be implemented on a regional basis, from the central city slowly to the suburbs. In this way, the control range from small to large, and the central city is relatively mature, easy to control. At the same time, tax rates are set at the same rate as bank deposits, which will better enable speculative clients to exit。 Chen Ruipeo said that the most direct way is to use the market rent of the lot to reverse property value, if the shop is $1000 per square metre, the rate of return of 8%, in 12, the actual value of 144,000 yuan, the proportion of property tax should be less than 3 per thousand per annum more appropriate.