June 30 Morning News, following the first trial last October, the most concerned about the true and false happy net case will be held in Beijing, the second Intermediate People's Court hearing again. The focus of the proceedings had been on the defendant's subject matter, and the oak had contested and appealed the jurisdiction, but had been dismissed. May 2009, Happy Net (kaixin001.com) to the Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court, accusing Thousand Oak under the Beijing thousand rubber interconnected unfair competition. October 2009, the first session of the case, Thousand oak interconnection, "Happy net" of the website name and domain names have been transferred to the Thousand Oak, another company under the name of thousands of rubber Netscape, happy net "wrong person." Then happy net added thousand rubber Netscape as a joint defendant. In February 2010, thousands of rubber Netscape to the residence in Shijingshan District, Beijing, the second to the Beijing Municipal Court of the jurisdiction of the dispute, that the case should be heard in Beijing, a Chinese court. In response to the objections of the Thousand Oak Netscape, the second Chinese Academy of Beijing believes that the thousand oak interconnection and the Thousand oak Netscape are the defendants in this case, of which the thousand oak interconnected residence in Chaoyang District, Beijing, belongs to the jurisdiction of the hospital, so the case also has jurisdiction, dismissed the thousand oak Netscape objections In response to this ruling, thousands of rubber Netscape, also filed an appeal to the Beijing High Court, that should be the company's domicile to determine the jurisdiction of the Court, and the Thousand oak interconnection is not the case "competent defendant", should not be in accordance with their domicile to determine the case of the jurisdiction of the Court, such In this appeal, the Beijing High Court issued a final verdict on May 18: Dismiss the appeal and maintain the original ruling. Happy NET Deputy lawyer Li Yunde previously said, along with the case of the second trial, the industry concerned about the verdict, and whether the case to solve the network industry "disorderly competition" has a positive impact, is about to come to the bottom. (Edit Zhang Xing)
The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion;
products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the
content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem
within 5 days after receiving your email.
If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to:
info-contact@alibabacloud.com
and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.