How can Windows systems not be as good as Mac OS X?

Why can't a Windows system be as beautiful as Mac OS X?

First of all, this is a pseudo proposition.

In fact, Windows has many advantages over Mac OS X operating systems, such as the number of software that can be run on it.

Software and hardware compatibility is invincible in the world.

These are only visible and completely objective (i.e., two points that no extreme fruit powder or anyone with any sense of aesthetics can refute).

If you consider the subjective factor, Windows also has a lot better than Mac OS X place, but this is a matter of opinion, so no example.

If only from the beautiful and easy to use two aspects, in fact, if the budget is not limited, the operating system can actually be ignored.

Imagine windows with a 100-inch retina 50-point touch screen and the highest-precision Kinect, with the right software, the MAC OS x experience is just slag. Okay.

So:

Windows is the main Sue is invincible compatibility, Windows as a compatible PC general operating system, compatibility is always in the first place. Whether you are in the computer city to spend five yuan to buy a pirated CD-ROM or Microsoft authorized dealers to buy Windows Hardcover version, Microsoft will not sell you a matching keyboard and mouse display and chassis power hard disk memory card CPU, etc. ....

Regardless of what brand of equipment you use, Windows provides a consistent experience whether you use a 100-inch retina monitor or a 14-inch substandard. Obviously the 100-inch retinal 50-point touch monitor is far fewer people than the 22-inch normal display, so Microsoft can only optimize the experience with the latter.

It's obvious that people who use a single touch touch pad or a threesome 20-dollar mouse are much more than those who use almost 4-inch magic trackpad to support multitouch.

Even if Apple's own hardware-software operating system isn't combined in any way better than Windows, which has a bad operating system, Apple should have closed down.

Response：

The first sentence at the beginning of this answer is to filter the NC fruit powder.

Because the salient features of NC powder is only to see the point of view does not look at the argument, the idea is not to comment on the criticism, so, I put all the comments to scold no argument or argument is simply a shrimp pull the ball NC powder one by one black, hoping to purify the future screen space.

Put aside the first sentence, the answer tells the following several points:

1. Windows and Mac OS X have their strengths, and Windows ' open compatibility is unmatched by OS X.

2, experience and beauty is subjective evaluation, especially the experience is related to hardware, soft and hard apple is easier to do a better experience. The shell that has a decisive impact on the user experience is not a necessary part of the operating system (how many of you are using the XX desktop, the software that changed your desktop is not part of Windows), such as Linux many release version even the shell does not, as beautiful and easy to use, Geek Think Linux is the best use, OS x weak burst.

3, beautiful and easy to use is not the main demand of Windows, and in order to meet the general software and hardware compatibility, Windows must be beautiful and easy to make trade-offs. An operating system that can be used on most mainstream hardware cannot be done beautifully.

4, if the soft and hard one to do the user experience than any hardware can use the operating system experience is poor, the company should have been closed, so that Apple must experience better users, or simply sell it.

And for some fruit powder to say what the questioner asked is the operating system I have to pull the hardware questioning, this is a matter of opinion, but this guy didn't answer me. I give OS X a trackball and a quad-color display (we assume that an invincible Daniel has developed these devices OS X drivers) can be pretty good.

About Luna style I would like to say a word, Vista just released when the number of people's computer is an integrated graphics card, how many people's computer can not open aero effect. Turning Aero off Vista is uglier than Luna, which is called hardware-independent?!

Or we can take the first Apple Computer to compare with the current mainstream PC.

We are not going to review what the operating system is doing, take the operating system to compare beautiful and easy to use is an unprofessional question. In order to install B ignore this big talk about how good OS X, anyway, the moral integrity early.