Mobile phone real-name: helper or fingers?

Author: Xishan Bamboo mobile phone real-name real name will become to help users more secure information Consumption Service helper, or become some department power rent-seeking hand? The ministry once again intends to maintain order, requiring a new network of fixed and mobile phone users to enforce a real-name real-name phone before September 1. This time, unlike in the past, the required real-name object is mainly for the new network users. According to the Ministry of the definition, that refers to the fixed telephone installation, transfer machine, transfer, mobile phone account, transfer of users. It seems that the real-name phone call is very strict, the Ministry of Industry even in the provision of authorized (or ordered) the telecommunications sector directly refused to meet the requirements of the name of the user to provide telecommunications services. However, according to the 40th article of the Constitution, the freedom of communication of citizens is protected by law, so it is not possible to determine whether the telecom operators or future virtual operators have legal problems in denying users access to communication services. However, this time, according to the NPC last year, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on strengthening the protection of information on the Internet decision, the Ministry to promote the real-name system looks very determined. It's not like I just made a request. Many people continue to the mobile phone real-name effect to maintain a skeptical attitude, because from the past to take the real name of the effect and progress of the process to see, there is still a lot of resistance. Their own perspective, for information security of personal privacy protection, but also a large number of groups are not willing to provide personal information to third parties. To tell you the truth, China's current legal and social environment in the protection of personal information privacy and the abuse of personal information on the strength of the public is not a convincing fact. Therefore, when the public can not be trusted to provide reliable information to enjoy the communication services, when the public cannot trust the telecommunications industry, the national law and social system will have effective institutional relief to their information, and will naturally encounter resistance. Then, if in accordance with the imminent implementation of the telephone real-name management requirements, the main control of the target is the new network customers, when these users are not willing to provide information, will inevitably turn to the current market is still in circulation does not have real-name information of the user numbers to this inference, We can expect to fry the current number of non real-name real-name users in various channels. Illegal profit-making institutions also hoard such user cards in large quantities. So, inevitably, the public's freedom of communication threshold is raised. This creates a dual-track market existence, one is the real-name market, a non-real-name market. There is no difference in service, just because of the intervention of regulatory policy, it is considered to cause scarcity and increase the price of resources in a certain market. This is a very typical case of resource price inflation caused by government regulation. Of course, perhaps such a thing will not happen, if the real-name policy this time will not be strictly enforced. But I am afraid it is difficult, even if the Ministry of Industry for a long time to open one eye, for the telecommunications sector, but also faced with the rules, and at any time in the situation of being singled out for intervention. Therefore, for the telecommunications industry, the strict implementation is now in line with the long-term optimalChoice. According to the requirements of the Ministry of Industry, if the telecommunications sector does not cooperate and refuse to implement, one is to be a fine two is to inform, and even be sent to court. The public's choice cannot be controlled, but the behaviour of the major operators can be controlled, with the main control being fines. This is not to worry, such a implementation and supervision of the complex rules, in the end will be to help users more secure information consumption services, or become a department of power rent-seeking hand?