Problems found in the detection of the Consortium

Abstract: The company's Wuhan station, although Jingzhou station has been established, but there are still some problems. Today, when I checked the website using the test tools of the Web, I found that there were more than 700 places in the Jingzhou station that did not meet the standards of the consortium. First of all, let's introduce the consortium. Said

The company's Wuhan station, although Jingzhou station has been established, but there are still some problems. Today, when I checked the website using the test tools of the Web, I found that there were more than 700 places in the Jingzhou station that did not meet the standards of the consortium.

First of all, let's introduce the consortium.

Speaking of which, the WWW and the web is the same person, the Internet father: Berners-Lee, is said to be hired by Google, with a lot of pay. This is really a legend, after inventing the internet, feel the browser too much, Web page interpretation is not the same as the fact that the Internet development is very bad, so he created the World Wide Web Consortium, and SEO, as well as the Wide, the full name of the Universal Web Consortium. To address the incompatibilities of different platforms, technologies, and developers in Web applications, and to ensure the smooth and complete flow of web information, the World Wide Web Consortium has developed a set of standards and urged Web application developers and content providers to follow these standards. Standards include the use of language specifications, guidelines used in development, and explanations of engine behavior, and so on. The consortium also developed a number of far-reaching standards, including XML and CSS. However, the Web standards set by the consortium do not seem to be mandatory but merely recommended. As a result, some websites still cannot fully implement these standards. In particular, Web pages designed using the early WYSIWYG web editing software often contain a large number of non-standard code.

So, what is the relationship between the standard of the consortium and SEO?

Famous SEO Blog: Search Marketing Wisdom The author of Google's anti-spam project, Matt, posted tweets on Twitter: "The compliance is not a SEO factor to Google #MattCuttsQuote #SMX "means that the standard of the consortium is not the way to do Google seo. But he added in the blog: "In addition to the" image alternate attribute, there are several other HTML standard tags, which is properly used (in accordance with the guidelines for valid job of Web pages), are clearly SEO best practices as. Whether It's proper use header tags, bolding, bullet point implementation, or any one of the dozens upon-dozens to HTML, It's clear that the a site is decoupled out from the SEO perspective, where that site meets those standards.

Heck, if a site is so botched up in the validation process, it's Evan possible that Google won ' t Evan was Inc. to index it. " He means: "In addition to the image substitution code, there are some other HTML tags, if used in accordance with the standards of the standard, is obviously SEO best practice." ... Obviously, a Web page conforms to the SEO effect better "

Does the website have to be optimized for the standard of the consortium?

In 2008-10, there has been a discussion at the Point Stone Forum: "The Web site in line with the standard =50% SEO work", of course, more people think: "Everyone else is wrong, I also wrong, what relationship?" This is of course the general idea, but I would like to say is that often this idea is the most harmful, everyone, there must be different, parrot, not independent thinking, how others do, we also how to do, how can play the best optimization role. The question is so prevalent that no one realizes his importance. Think of this I am very ...

Go on, say, "The SEO work that conforms to the standard of the Web page =50%", this kind of conclusion has appeared too many in this country of our door. He has no basis, no reasoning process, directly to you to a conclusion, yes, is 50% ... Who knows how to get here? No one knows, but everyone says so and everyone believes.

The famous SEO blog SEOmoz released the message that: "The standard of the 1.4-point, and the total score is 21.8 points", this article by a Shanghai Seoer translated into Chinese, if you need to watch, you can click on this link. In the news released by SEOmoz, it is also said that the standard of the consortium is of small importance. SEOmoz's editor says: "The web design that conforms to the standard of the website is advantageous to enhance the search engine friendliness, but does not say that the standard of the consortium is directly related to SEO." His weight remains low. "The Web standards established by the Bo are only recommended standards," said it commentator Keso. That is to say, the organization simply guides web designers through standardized design. And the search engine is through the crawler to read the content of the source page analysis, so the task of SEO is to optimize the content of the Web page, rather than the page code optimization. ”

My advice

If the site does not even have a brand, we need to optimize from all aspects, and not only include the SEO level, for the Web page design, promotion, should be carried out, if you do not have a brand, traffic is also very little, the site does very rotten, so how can you let users like you? Do you really think you're the ministry?