Sasac issued a two-year performance appraisal method to replace

(Reporter investigation) 2010 middle-aged enterprises to fully enter the economic value added evaluation of the exam era, this new assessment system will drive the central enterprise to enhance the cost awareness, bigger and stronger main business. What does 2010 mean for the big three carriers?　　Not only 163,500,000,003 G after the direct investment precipitation and carding, but also the central enterprises Economic Value added (EVA) The first year of self-confidence and uneasy, but also for the initial contribution of all staff performance assessment of the adaptation and discipline. Recently, SASAC in a week has issued the "Central enterprises in charge of the management of the interim measures" (hereinafter referred to as "interim measures") and "on the further strengthening of the Central Enterprise Staff performance assessment Work Guidance" (hereinafter referred to as "guidance") two of the new rules of assessment,　　From the enterprise value embodiment and completely eliminates the examination dead angle two aspects from the Central Enterprise head third term beginning to carry on the comprehensive supervision to the centralized enterprises. Eva Test from this year onwards, the central enterprises to fully enter the economic value added evaluation of the exam era.　　The so-called economic value added refers to the approved enterprise after-tax net operating profit minus the capital cost of the balance. According to the provisions of the assessment measures, SASAC's annual business evaluation Index of the central enterprise includes basic index and classification index, total profit and economic value added two basic indexes, respectively, accounting for 30 basic and 40 basic points.　　This means that the importance of EVA to the central enterprises has exceeded profits.　　Sasac in charge of the Central enterprise Performance evaluation of the Deputy Director Huangshu and clearly said that the 2010 central Enterprises and assessment of the full implementation of economic Value added index is to strengthen the value creation-oriented, guide enterprises pay more attention to capital use efficiency, bigger and stronger main business, strengthen risk control. In fact, the three operators in charge of economic value added to the concept is not unfamiliar, as early as 2008 SASAC announced the full implementation of the economic Value added evaluation in 2010, when the telecommunications central enterprises as a pilot enterprises in the center of the first to introduce EVA evaluation indicators.　　And the industry is quite concerned about the three operators performance assessment classification indicators, according to the characteristics of the telecommunications industry to comprehensively consider the enterprise technology innovation capacity resources and environmental protection level, sustainable development capacity and core competitiveness and other factors to determine, the specific indicators will be in charge of the three operators and the state-funded committee signed the responsibility of SASAC Research Center experts told reporters, EVA indicators to remind central management, debt or equity, all the capital is cost, after deducting all the cost of that part, is the real surplus.　　It will prevent some companies appear "digital" on the performance of water and profit false high, so that "digital" truly return to their own, showing its true function and role, let management understand the value of the company's real situation.　　Two years of substandard substitution in the overall implementation of EVA indicators, "interim measures" also stipulates that, according to the completion of performance, SASAC based on the annual operating performance assessment results and term of business performance assessment results, the enterprise responsible for the implementation of rewards and punishments, and the results of business performance assessment as the company responsible for the appointment and dismissal of the important basis. The interim measures require, in accordance with the rightResponsible for the unification of the requirements, the establishment of the business owner of the management performance and incentive and restraint mechanism combined with the assessment system, namely performance, remuneration, performance, remuneration, and as an important basis for the appointment and dismissal, establish a sound scientific and reasonable, traceable asset management responsibility system. And in accordance with the state-owned assets to preserve and increase the value of shareholders and the maximization of sustainable development requirements, according to the law to check the business performance.　　The management performance of the business owner, the implementation of the annual assessment and term assessment, the combination of results assessment and process evaluation, assessment results and rewards and punishments linked to the assessment system. According to SASAC requirements, the three major operators in the third quarter of each year to the SASAC to be completed in the next year to complete the business performance evaluation objectives proposed value and necessary explanatory material.　　The evaluation objective proposed value is not less than the actual completion value of the previous year's evaluation index or the average of the actual completion value of the first three years.　　Sasac clearly stated that the term of the business performance evaluation goals or not completed the annual operating performance evaluation objectives for two consecutive years, and no significant objective reasons, the owner of the enterprise to adjust. All staff assessment in addition to the dead corner if the economic value added and two years of non-compliance is the direct evaluation of operators, and the "interim measures" after less than a week after the promulgation of the "guidance" is further clear, performance assessment covers from the main head of the enterprise to Deputy, functional department management personnel,　　From the group company to all the subordinate enterprises or units, all staff. Sasac's financial supervision and evaluation Bureau of the relevant officials said that at present, the enterprise Deputy, functional departments of the assessment system is not perfect, pay distribution there is a certain degree of average tendency.　　Staff performance assessment, the key in a "full" word, to achieve full coverage of the assessment, the total elimination of evaluation dead ends. For operators, the subordinate enterprises and employees of the assessment of specific coverage of what indicators?　　According to the requirements of the SASAC: The assessment must be targeted, the subordinate enterprise responsible for the assessment of asset management efficiency, capital return level and value creation capacity, the assessment of enterprise staff, to quantitative and qualitative combination.　　One operator told reporters that the group had already set up assessment targets for each post, but it was not clear how some of the company's leaders were evaluated.　　In this respect, SASAC also clearly pointed out that the corporate deputy and functional management departments of the assessment, to listen to the grassroots and the Unit's views, and effectively accept the staff supervision. For more information, please subscribe to the communications industry newspaper. Subscription Hotline: 010-88558777