Warrior Luo Hammer Master King freely: few points of view agree

Luo Wang freely debate the evening news August 27, Hammer Technology founder Luo and independent evaluation agency Zealer founder Wang Ziluo to appear Youku, in response to Wang's free Hammer T1 mobile video evaluation on the spot confrontation.　　The entire debate lasted more than three hours, Luo in advance to prepare more than 10 titles for Wang free Hammer T1 video evaluation, and the product itself is mainly in the direction of factual error and black. Part.1 Both sides affirmed common sense error throughout the debate, two of people have repeatedly confrontation, mutual confrontation, and to be able to stand at the scene and the two sides affirmed common sense error only four points: 1, Data protection switch inside the cabin after the rear cover is removed the king is comfortable. The rear cover data protection switch mentioned in the review is actually a trigger opening for the future Hammer T1 battery back clamp. 2, screen line inside the copper wire breakdown or hit the king freely evaluation previously believed that because the screen line and the button did not do isolation processing, users in use may lead to static electricity from the key gap through the hit line, so that the line within the wire breakdown or break. In response to this problem, Luo explained that this is a matter of common sense, because static electricity is impossible to break metal material, and the king freely also said to accept the question, and called it a slip of the tongue. 3, screen visual angle Test omission evaluation will hammer T1, LG G3 and the iphone 5c visual angle test, three mobile phones have monochrome background tiles, and then the evaluation results found that the hammer T1 visual angle is the worst, because in the side observation of the phone screen, The screen has changed from a positive red vision to a mauve color. Three mobile phones parallel flat, but the camera seat with three mobile phones formed three different angles, and was placed in the front of the hammer T1 the largest angle, which was Luo thought is deliberately for it, that is, he called Black one of the points.　　4, the fuselage back hammer logo technology about the hammer T1 behind the logo process, not the king freely described the chemical erosion, but PVD electroplating process. The key point of the part.2 dispute is that, in addition to the above, almost both are difficult to achieve in other arguments. The key problems are mainly focused on the durability of Hammer T1, the advantages and disadvantages of adding sponge after screen, the large difference of screen production machine and the problem of white balance and purple edge. 1, Product durability Hammer T1 using double-sided glass design, which is similar to the iphone 4, but Wang freely evaluation that the T1 button slender open hole span large, glass panel R sharp Angle, the fuselage relatively heavy has greatly increased the risk of broken screen. In addition, as the iphone 4 or Sony Xperia Z is not the same as using the box protection, but the glass panel with the box flush will cause the front panel without protection direct focus on damage. Luo that the first design of the hammer T1 the priority of visual beauty more than easy to fall and easy to use priority, at the same time Hammer technology launched 200 yuan accident insurance can greatly protect the user's interests. In addition, Luo will hammer the phone with the first iphone of 2007 with 20In contrast to the iphone 4 in 10, he said that Apple in 2007 (referring to the first iphone) and 2010 (referring to the iphone 4) led to a fall in the handset industry, which the king freely subsequently endorsed. Furthermore, Luo said the test lab for the hammer T1 was the Foxconn Laboratory, built by Foxconn and Motorola, and that the hammer T1 test fully complied with the lab's test standards and said the lab would be presented with a test result. Wang freely said that has been 5 hammer T1 mobile phone drop test, at a height of one meter has been four broken. 2, the use of additional sponge after the screen in the evaluation of the King freely pointed out that the hammer T1 under the screen components to increase the sponge to prevent heat from the rear conduction to the screen part of the cooling, resulting in high body temperature. And Luo that this is a purely deliberate design, so as to prevent heat conduction to the screen components, to avoid heat on the screen display, which is the same as Google Nexus 5. 3, Mass production machine screen difference King freely test found that the hammer T1 individual quality differences, uneven, and such problems, especially the screen, the screen brightness of the tester can vary by 140, color temperature difference of more than 1000K, and static contrast is exactly one times worse. In this regard, Luo does not have actual T1 test data, but stresses that almost all mobile phone manufacturers on screen parameters will be similar differences. He randomly sampled eight iphone 5s for screen tests, with the highest difference in brightness, color temperature and static contrast between 102, 655K, and 373, proving that the T1 performance of the hammer was in the industry's normal condition. He also questioned Wang freely, hammer using JDI-supplied screen components, not for late set-up, and he knew that most mobile phone manufacturers for the screen will not be two times, such as Google Nexus 5, so in his opinion Wang freely evaluation data is not normal. Similarly, the screen leak Luo also indicates that the hammer T1 conforms to industry basic standards and is not below that level.　　He believes that no handset maker can do better than a hammer in screen control, except for Apple's Samsung two. 4, photographed purple edge and white balance first, Luo admitted the hammer T1 focusing speed and night noise, but on the Wang Ziluo point of the photo purple edge and white balance imbalance, luo that this is not true. To this end, Luo in the Hammer website launched T.tt/photo page, the hammer T1 mobile phone and the other 11 mobile phones for the horizontal contrast, respectively, in the same scene and test methods for the purple edge, white balance and night noise test to illustrate. The king freely said that through a large number of tests found that from the engineering machine to the production machine purple edge problem is gradually improved, which means that the hammer is to train the problem.　　However, Luo insists that both the engineering machine and the mass production machine are not adjusted on hardware and software. Part.3 Luo pointed at Zealer after the Hammer T1 video evaluation debate, LuoYong-ho is directed at the Zealer team and faces three big questions: Zealer's strategic financing, the role of reference advisor to the hammer, and the details of the mobile phone business. Before the two sides video dialogue, Wang freely at noon today published long Weibo "choice", and clearly elaborated the Zealer investor background, including the first lei under the Beijing Shun for venture capital fund, and later Oppo, Vivo and Gionee. Luo that there are domestic mobile phone manufacturers to invest in the Zealer can not maintain their stated objective, independent. Wang freely said that, although there are mobile phone manufacturers to invest, but Zealer is still a team holding, there is no Luo so-called is the state of the package. Second, Luo claimed to have previously hired Wang freely made a hammer T1 mobile phone consultants, Wang freely also for Hammer phone report, but the report did not mention the problem of evaluation, so that Wang freely violated the professional ethics, and this is one of the main causes of anger Luo. In the end, Luo has shifted focus to Zealer's mobile repair business, saying that zealer procurement of the so-called original iphone accessories source is illegal, and the king freely also admitted that accessories from Huaqiang North, and said it may be from Apple on behalf of the factory outflow, but not with the Zealer team,　　Luo should be accountable to the supplier of Huaqiang parts. Part.4 background: The source of the contradictions a mobile phone, a mobile phone evaluation, the contradictions of course is about the hammer phone evaluation. The king is comfortable with the hammer of the phone's evaluation, the hammer T1 phone is not high. The camera is divided into 62.8 points, the screen is divided into 59.4 points, the endurance of 43.8 points, the temperature is divided into 79.8 points. After this review, Luo and hammer technology did not have the first time to respond, Wang freely then on the micro-blog @ Hammer Technology hopes to respond to some of the problems of the hammer phone. And Luo in the evaluation released 12 days after the official response to the King freely: @ Wang freely zealer you don't blindly guess, I do everything is aboveboard. I have not responded to so long, is because in the factory busy production, and need some time to confirm some data, now almost, if you have a clear conscience, we will go to Youku to do live program when facing quality, hammer technology is responsible for reimbursement of your first class ticket and five-star hotel. Everyone help forward, thank you. Before the enemies, two people had frequent interactions on Weibo, and the following is an excerpt from Luo's interaction with Wang on Weibo before August 1:1. Luo: Hate, letters will die? Now my wife is making fun of me ... @ the King is free Zealer yesterday unexpectedly dream you, [Chanzui]@ Luo 2. Luo: finished, free and reliable! @ Wang freely zealer:a whole new level! @ZEALER China Zealer produced Meizu MX 2 evaluation!! More highlights welcome to our main station: WWW.zealer.com http://t.cn/zjdbkTT3 Luo: the better! Optimistic about the development of ease. @ Wang freely Zealer "Samsung Galaxy Note II evaluation-by Wang freely" video address Http://t.cn/zlE16kv4 Luo: Mr Wang's evaluation is very reliable, recommend 9900 of potential buyers to see. @ Wang freely zealer BlackBerry 9900 test--by techmessager http://t.cn/aDvRJd5. Luo: So it is certainly a lot of good to the left. @ Bubble Cell phone channel All clap still Zhang announced, left for the new HTC One shot, right is iPhone5 shooting. Using UltraPixel technology of the new HTC One, the proofs size is only about 50% of the iPhone5. Also want to ask Mr. Luo to comment on these two Android and iOS platform high-end mobile phone camera? Bullish on HTC's UltraPixel technology? (Qi Hin)