Which type of employee does the leader like, is an employee who dares to stick to his point of view or is obscene and obedient? This is a very good question. Here are some things for everyone to recommend this article from know almost network.
Know almost friends: Comrade Tang monk
1, leadership (superior) is something.
A basic concept is that the company's business is not democratic. The general manager is authorized by the board of directors to administer the company. To the extent permitted by law, without prejudice to professional ethics, the general manager has the absolute right to the business and management of the company. Management is authorized by the general manager in charge of the relevant business port, have the absolute right. The department manager is authorized by the management to manage the relevant business department and has absolute management power.
This is different from the way society is organized. The leader of a country is elected. It is the responsibility of all citizens to administer the country, but the company is not.
Your general manager, as well as your leadership, is not elected, appointed, and is empowered by layers to gain rights management companies.
Therefore, at the lowest level, the leadership's assessment of your management practices, including work arrangements and work results, is absolutely not subject to personality insult, non-violation of professional ethics, non-violation of law, and failure to exceed authorizations It can even be subjective.
2, what is a subordinate
Eight words: get people money, and people eliminate disaster.
In most cases, your leader is also someone's subordinate. Everyone should uphold this principle. It is because we took wagers or other people's money because we called wage earners or professional managers, and did the job. Then you should do well what others have arranged.
Today you come to work, no one to arrange for you to work, but your time is accounted for, the other party should pay you (salary). Tomorrow to arrange for your work, you may or may not do well (good and bad may be a subjective evaluation), then this will determine how much your bonus.
So, get people money, and people eliminate the disaster (there are the second half, after another topic to say). This is the most basic professionalism and professional ethics.
3, what is "Disaster relief with people."
Combining the first and second points, the definition of disrespecting a person is "doing a good job in explaining the leadership."
So, what are the preconditions for the work done by the leaders?
A, understand the intention of the leader. Here's how to paraphrase leaders and confirm the timing, quality, and even the pace of your work.
B, the process of maintaining feedback. Whether it is progressing smoothly or not, it should be the progress of communication and confirm the correct direction. There are difficulties more should be the first time informed, as well as solutions or options.
C, after the completion of the report. Many people often ignore this, so often there will be "That case I sent to you two days ago, ah" such feedback. Please note: The completion of the work is not measured by the completion itself, but by the completion of the work report and evaluation as a measure.
4, the superior never wrong, you are wrong.
This sentence is too alarmist, we say it again rigorously: in business, does not involve personality insults (such as the higher authorities scold you sb), does not involve professional ethics (such as the leadership let you do a fake account), does not involve ultra vires, leadership forever Not wrong.
Your report is done, you sent it to him, and then he did not see it. Missed the time of submission.
Not he is wrong, you are wrong, because you did not urge him.
You urge him, he still did not see.
Not him wrong, you are wrong, because you did not urge him a second time.
You urge him a second time, he still did not see.
Not he is wrong, you are wrong, because you did not when he was not busy, stood beside his computer and told him that today do not look too late, you now take the time to see it, and then there are problems I go to change .
This is called a professional attitude.
Therefore, the subject, the workplace does not exist what you say "obviously someone else's mistake, but blame me" this situation, but you have not yet mature enough to hold a most professional attitude.
5, you are never wrong, is superior wrong.
Only in one case is this the time when you face the greater leadership together.
ok, finally, he still did not read this report. At this moment, the leader at a higher level will blame him. When you face a higher-level leader, you are right and you are leading the wrong party. Because all subordinate responsibilities in front of a higher level of leadership, are your immediate responsibility.
But when I go back to his office, it's your fault, only when you are two people.
- === The above is a professional answer, the following is chicken soup === -
6, do not ask the superior perfect.
As a newcomer, the superior is not what you control the circle and influence the circle. You can not change your superiors, you can only change yourself. Even if you change a superior, you still have to learn to change yourself to grow.
At the same time superior emotions, there are eight hours of work affect the mood, personal likes and dislikes, emotional ups and downs.
Please feel better to ask your superiors, rather than taking good care of yourself is correct.
So what you are going to do right now is not justified, nor is it submissive.
Instead, treat your superiors as a girl you chase after you, to understand how he feels about you, what is your assessment, try to correct, try to improve himself and try to keep his pace with him, which is Your most important thing
- === The following is a high-level answer, the subject can choose to see after a year, -_- # === -
7, manage your superiors.
Mentioned earlier, superiors rated you may be subjective. At the same time, superiors often play two roles, one is the referee and the other is the trainer. You want him to be your trainer, not the referee, because the former is one of you, the latter is an outsider.
How to do?
a, martial arts world, only fast not broken. The tasks entrusted by the leaders should be promptly completed, promptly reported and promptly tested for quality. Give you a report, tell you the idea, and you two days out of results, he is a trainer, because that has his train of thought; you a week out of the result, he is the referee, because he had forgotten it.
b, come up with 80% of the energy to deal with 20% of the most important things. I can not teach you what is important, to give a hint: If a workmaster asked you the second time, that is mostly an important matter, please finish as soon as possible.
c, with him to face his superiors, to help him complete the task given by superiors. To put it too high, do not talk about specific methods, but also need to understand their own.
8, extra words.
90 after the flood began to pour into the workplace, we also began to pay attention to the emotions after 90, and try not to label in the process. But children always "want both salary and mood." Growing up In a relatively free and open environment, "fairness" and "respect" are everywhere. Attribution methods are often attributed to "obviously someone else's work problems", and rarely reflect on and think about themselves. I always feel that "I have the ability to have an idea, but I just can not play it out."
Think back ten thousand steps, if each problem is someone else's problem, may your performance evaluation will have a good impact. But will you make progress? Or will your future progress come from the accumulation of successful experience? Can you improve yourself without the spirit of "daily life?"
Therefore, please also invite newcomers to the workplace, we must first uphold a "most professional mentality", and then we talk about, what is "thinking about the implementation of" what is "to achieve their own ideas."
Wish the Lord can change their own way, all the way safe.
More answers>