Academy of Social Sciences: housing problem of China's difficult groups remains grim

BEIJING, November 16 (Xinhua) Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 16th released the first housing Green Paper, "China's Housing Development Report (2009-2010)" pointed out that the housing problem of China's difficult groups is still grim, housing security responsibilities. The Green Paper on housing, prepared by the Institute of Finance and Trade and Economics of the Academy of Social Sciences, points out that the nationwide supply of 56,000 acres of affordable housing was increased by 36.3% in the first half of 2009.　　By the end of June 2009, the central government has issued a grant of 54.8 billion yuan, the place has been in place funds 41.5 billion yuan, the central investment subsidy project has started 5,434, accounted for 80% of the plan, the construction area of 63.6 million square meters, accounting for 60% of the plan, the completion of investment 38.8 billion yuan, accounting for 30% of the　　The Green Paper argues that difficult groups include families in general income, low-and middle-income families, low-income families and migrant workers working in cities, single-parent families and empty nests in an increasing number of elderly groups. The Green Paper points out that although the housing market system in China is developing rapidly, the housing supply structure has been diversified, and a multi-level housing security system has been constructed. However, the housing market system in China still has the following five major problems: first, the Construction of Provident Fund system has not been completed, the scope of protection is small, the protection of deviation. At present, China's Provident Fund coverage is very low, Provident fund into a narrow range of funds, the use of inefficient Provident Fund. The Provident Fund submitted by the employees is determined according to the ratio of the deposit, the salary payable and the maximum amount of Provident Fund, and does not count to income.　　As a result, the higher the Provident Fund, the greater the amount of tax avoidance, and the higher the security of the housing money enjoyed. Second, the housing system supervision and exit mechanism is imperfect. The policy of housing supply has made some contribution to alleviating the contradiction between housing supply and demand and restraining the house price, but it has left many problems because of inadequate supervision and imperfect exit mechanism.　　For example, the housing area is too large, uneven distribution, one has more than a set of affordable housing, through the use of affordable housing operations to obtain huge profits and so on, the actual effect of the policy and the expected goal is far from the difference. Third, the low-rent housing system construction is slow, the protection scope is small, the fund gap is big. By the end of June 2007, 586 cities had established a low-rent housing system, accounting for 89.3%.　　By the end of 2006, low-income families, which had improved their living environment through low-rent housing, had 547,000 households, representing 5.5% of the target at the end of 2008. The form of housing security is single and does not match the distribution of per capita income.　　HP's Provident Fund coverage is low and tends to high income, limit rooms, affordable housing and housing have threshold income, and a variety of guaranteed housing between the threshold is not continuous, the difference is large, and the form of a single, resulting in the sandwich layer of housing difficulties. The lack of census data and the lack of long-term planning of housing security. At present, China not only lacks the statistic data of urban residents ' income distribution, but also lacks the data of housing census. Therefore, it is difficult to accurately grasp the actual situation of housing difficulties and do the corresponding measures.