Analyze the good and hidden trouble of large data

According to a recent study by the Pew Research Center, big data, used properly, can help save energy, cure disease, and better predict trends. But there are also fears that large governments and large businesses will be harmed by the abuse of big data.

Big Data does a lot of things for us, but not everything is good. As the internet of things comes online, technology can help us conserve energy, treat diseases and predict trends. But there are also concerns that large numbers will be controlled and used disproportionately, and that big governments and large businesses will be harmed by the broader public. According to a recent study by the Pew Research Center, "future http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/14294.html" > Big Data, the research report shows.

"While proponents of big data see great potential for using big data, there are privacy advocates worried because more and more people are starting to collect the data, whether they intentionally disclose it or not ... or posting them through social media, and even unknowingly publishing specific digital details by sharing their lives. According to the report.

The researchers asked respondents who were more likely to happen in two of the following cases. The first is the extent to which large data plays a positive role, which means that human and machine analysis of large datasets will improve social, political and economic intelligence in 2020. This will facilitate the development of "proximity forecasts" or real-time prediction events, as well as "inferential software assessment data patterns, project results and the creation of advanced algorithms to better understand the world." ”

On the contrary, the other scenario assumes that by 2020, large data will cause problems that outweigh the problems it solves. The analysis of these huge data rallies gives false confidence in our predictive capabilities, leading to the making of many major and harmful wrong decisions. Moreover, data are abused by powerful people or institutions, and selfish manipulation agendas reach the results they want.

The results of the survey show that the two cases are very close to each other. 53% of respondents said the first situation was more likely to occur, while 39% of respondents chose the latter.

Feedback Sample:

Blaintrogden, a user experience expert, said:

Governments and organizations that can tap into these data resources will have a huge advantage over those that cannot be tapped. The speed, agility, and innovation of large data can determine winners and losers, and let us shift from the mindset of "think Twice" to a fast bet.

Brain Harvey, a lecturer at the University of California, Berkeley, wrote:

Information is collected to benefit the rich, sacrificing the poor. I think few people will see it as a positive outcome, so your choice should be "to benefit the rich" or "to the poor", rather than "socially beneficial" and "socially harmful".

Skimming the report, I only thought of the latest banking scandal in which bankers were conspiring to set Libor rates to meet their own purposes. The ability to collect and analyze large data in the hands of industry giants will be a pretty scary prospect.

The survey, conducted by the Pew Research Center Internet and the American Life Project and the University of Iraq, has been emailed to 1021 Internet experts and recruiters.

(Responsible editor: The good of the Legacy)