Australian media analysis of the rise of millet five reasons: China's vast market

In the past week, low-cost Chinese millet companies have emerged as the world's third-largest maker of smart machines after Samsung and Apple, according to the Australian website Smartcompany11 6th. In this respect, a foreign reader named Bob published his opinion, pointing out that some of the millet equipment has some quality problems. Yes, but if you're an expert, you'll find that millet is worth our attention for five reasons: the developed country's intelligent machine market has saturated in some developed market, the intelligent machine faces the market saturation condition. Today, about 66.2% of the Australian people have a smart machine, in terms of penetration, millet is in the world's 13th place. There will not be a large number of smartphone users updating their phones for the time being, so look for other markets. Data map China's vast market is the other market in the above, the development of smart machine prospects are considerable. Consider this: Australia has a population of about 23 million, Japan is about 120 million, the United States is about 319 million, 23 EU member States, including Britain, the total population is about 507 million. In short, the total population of Australia, Japan, the United States and the European Union is about 975 million. However, China Telecom, which has the least number of users in three mobile operators, is 180 million, Unicom is 297 million, the world's first mobile has 799 million, more than the total population of the EU plus Japan. The latest figures show that Android has 80.9% of China's smart-machine market. So why do the 12.8 of mobile phone users not choose apple? In developed country markets, such as Australia, most consumers pay the goods first, and they can enjoy government subsidies for 24 months. For example, in Australia, the price of 869 U.S. dollars (about 5311 yuan) of Apple 6, the user after purchase each month to pay 58 U.S. dollars (about 355 yuan), 24 months to pay a total of 1392 U.S. dollars (about 8508 yuan, more than the marked price.) This does not work in China, most users are paid to take the goods first. So you will buy 869 of dollars of apples, or cheap 100 dollars and good enough smart machine is self-evident. Not the android we imagined Google's Android operating system is open source. In theory, other companies want to build their own operations and applications based on Android without asking for Google's approval or royalties. The idea is that smart-machine manufacturers should follow Google's rules by using Google's apps, including its software and third-party platform software. For now, most handset makers will not do so. Why bother to produce an Android smart machine that can't use Google mail? Western countries have made a dangerous attempt: Amazon's firephone. Even with the world's largest E-commerce companies backed by Kindlestore of the vast number of applications, there are not many customers willing to buy. Now, the top of China's 83.4% Android smart machines is not Google's application system. One of them is millet, relying on its own company developed the Rice pomelo Android system, with its own application stores,Cloud services and user interfaces. Repeating history? It is said that in the 19th century, the United States made a product less than Europe, the 1970s, cheap Japanese electronics (such as Sony, Panasonic, Sharp) and cars (such as Toyota, Mitsubishi, Nissan) than the United States; in the late 80, Korean brands (Samsung, LG) were inferior to Japan. Today, people think that Chinese brands such as millet, in terms of quality, compared to those in Europe, the United States, Japan or Korea's products. However, there is such a big local market as a starting point, you will be foolish enough to believe that the Chinese brand will continue this way? (Internship compilation: Lio Santao: Chen)