Big Public international This time is "planted", the mark of the rating plan too make a tiger

I think the big public international this time is "planted". In response to the Lu Jin Peer-to-peer platform of the query, the true amount of contributions, the existence of capital pool, related security, and so on, after a rebuttal, was verified as untrue, the public temporarily no longer sound.

No one believes that Lu Jin is a perfect company, and that when the whole peer-to-peer crisis has been followed by a series of crises, many people do look at a company with a strong background in the shareholder's strength, and there is a similar crisis. But common sense tells me, if even this kind of platform has the problem, the entire peer-to-peer industry does not have to do again. Ma, the Chinese Ping An group, may not be responsible for such charges.
The report of the Grand Duke has proved to be a joke. Incredibly, it stumbled over the most basic information verification. It is doubtful how the company, which has been portrayed as China's national team, lacks such a basic degree of professionalism.
There is reason to suspect that the report of the grand Public international is the result of continuing "angry" and even the manipulation of speech. The attentive public can see that since January and March this year, it has been three consecutive times in the voice of the Peer-to-peer industry, and the target is to include leader Lu Jin. Now a bit of the meaning of a tiger, simply hope to a "lore", but the chicken did not eclipse the rice.
The latest round of time is more subtle, and it is catching up to March 10 before 315. This raises doubts about the motivations of the big public's voice: a conscious PR plan to make a sound before 315 can set off a wave. In fact, into the March, the market has said that this year, CCTV 315, Peer-to-peer will become a hot topic, seems to be a kind of preheating. March 10, March 13, the big public international timely voice, leaving traces of manipulation of speech.
This adds to the public's questioning of the results of such ratings. Some rating agencies and research institutions, generate, often borrow the so-called rating, research rankings, coerce enterprises to obtain money to buy the road. And many companies or in order to win a good position, or deliberately eliminate the crisis, pay public relations, resulting in some obviously distorted data, reports.
I do not dare to speculate whether there is such an evil in Grand International. But January 21 this year, the public international released the so-called "Internet financial blacklist and warning list," The previous day, several platform PR staff received the list of calls, some days did not appear in the blacklist. This report, has also aroused strong doubts, because some peer-to-peer platform, such as the basic information such as registration, the big Public international has a factual error.
Earlier, the big public international in many cases, such as the Ministry of Railways rating, local city rating and so on, have caused external questions, so many of China's corporate leaders have not yet established service cooperation with it. Over the years, Grand International has been playing up some kind of nationalist sentiment. Perhaps this kind of error-ridden rating report is in a angry mentality, trying to turn the line of sight, to win the public eye, the result of a bad game.
No one thinks Lu Jin are perfect. Over the past year, Peer-to-peer has become the biggest and most common risk topic for China's private finance. Successive crises have once cast doubt on the value of the industry. But like other internet sectors in China, the authorities still have considerable room for trial and error for such internet financial services. Up to now, phaseAlthough the Customs department does not have a unified regulatory policy, it is not the kind of factors that can cause systemic and regional financial risks. In fact, China's peer-to-peer industry has become one of the main financial services of China's private sector.
in this round of game, Lu Jin shows it as China's Peer-to-peer platform leading the emboldened. It clarified the question of three aspects of public information one by one, and presented it with a sum of 3 billion yuan financing news, which has enough strength to gain the trust of external investment institutions and even the whole capital market. It also means that it has opened a gap with thousands of peer-to-peer platforms.
But Lu Jin is also not perfect, in this round of crisis game, its initial reaction is somewhat contempt. Although the question of big public international has been planted, but it is based on the superficial information is really from the Lu Jin official website and other basic channels, this shows that Lu Jin in some simple letter, also not so positive, rapid. We should also pay attention to the responsibility of the Peer-to-peer Platform's initiative letter when we question the public-international untrue report.
Before the Spring Festival, in the interview with the Quark comments, another local evaluation agency Rong 360 also issued a Peer-to-peer rating report, it adopted a positive model, the form of fractions to the mainstream platform to do the ranking, Lu Jin ranked first. However, the rating only listed more than 100 platforms, the outside world questioned the small sample. 360 co-founder, CEO Ye Daqing, many platforms not only will not actively disclose information and data, corporate research will not cooperate with the disclosure, which brings great difficulty to the rating, so, Melt 360 of the sample report can only Ningquewulan. He stressed that a truly normative, transparent market, the letter is the platform's most basic credit embodiment. In fact, in the 360 rating report, the letter is also a key parameter.
relative to the current market in the mainstream of Peer-to-peer network lending platform ratings, the public has not publicly rated standards and rating methods, the results have been "language not surprisingly dead." In fact, why should the big Duke to lose the credibility to do such a thing, as a parent company for rating agencies, enterprises should be regarded as the credibility of life. Now, the situation of the Grand Duke is nothing but a foot in the foot.
If it's still so willful, don't say that breaking the monopoly of international rating agencies, I think it will one day be able to take it out on its own. However, if it is transformed into a PR firm, I think its future is promising.