Danish text not surprising

In addition to the country's historic vanity, Denmark's "little gestures", as well as the transformation of the EU's overall climate negotiating stance, Cao Haili The Danish secret negotiating text, which was first disclosed by the British Guardian on December 8, in an attempt to weaken the United Nations role in future climate negotiations, clearly deviating from the　　The basic principle of the "common but differentiated responsibility" of developed and developing countries in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"), at the Beira center of the United Nations climate talks, has detonated a ticking bomb that has drawn a voice of condemnation from developing countries. However, it is not surprising that the appearance of the Danish text has provoked outrage.　　In fact, as early as this (2009) year, "umbrella countries" such as Canada and Japan (the American-led developed camp) proposed a single legal document to replace the Kyoto Protocol. The proposal was made mainly for two reasons, the main one being the desire to include the United States. Since 2001, the United States withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol, and has been free of international mandatory emission reduction and restraint mechanisms.　　In 2008, the White House, the new President Barack Obama, after the inauguration of the former President Bush's negative resistance to the style and image, but the United States Congress in the future through the Kyoto Protocol or similar to the Kyoto Protocol, any international legally binding document is almost impossible. At the Bangkok meeting of the Convention in October this year, Kobayashi, a member of the Japanese negotiating delegation, explained to the author that while the Kyoto Protocol is a good carrier, "it is difficult for us to join the United States." We cannot include the United States. Another consideration is the desire to include developing countries. The existing negotiating framework is the two-track negotiating mechanism for the Kyoto Protocol and the Convention, and developed and developing countries have a "common but differentiated responsibility" in tackling climate change.　　Developed countries (with the exception of the US and abroad) have committed themselves to specific legally binding emission reduction targets in the Kyoto Protocol, while developing countries and the United States are negotiating long-term cooperative actions under the Convention, including mitigation, adaptation, financing, technology transfer and capacity-building.　　The "Umbrella country" proposal seeks to incorporate the so-called "advanced developing countries", such as China and India, into the same legal framework for the implementation of international verification. But the proposal was not supported by the European Union. The EU, which has played a leading role in climate change negotiations, is an advocate of the Kyoto Protocol and an active promoter.　　The EU has invested a lot of political capital and economic capital in the Kyoto Protocol, and it is not easy to give up easily. However, at the Bonn conference this August, the EU's attitude began to turn into a delicate twist. They are also beginning to talk about "two-track and one-track", although the attitude remains vague.　　Until the Bangkok meeting in October, the EU's stance was firmly on the "umbrella country" position. Although the EU has argued on several occasions that the EU is not going to "stifle" the Kyotoprotocol, instead of transferring the content of the negotiations already in the Kyoto Protocol to the new legal framework and adhering to the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities", while incorporating the United States and developing countries into the broader scope of participation, it appears to the developing countries, led by China,　　The aim of developed countries is to dilute or even substantively negate the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities". During the Bangkok meeting, Climate, director of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Global Climate Project (intiative), Kim Castensson Kim Carstensen, a former Danish government climate negotiator, once communicated with some media reporters that The impasse should still be in the EU. Bali meeting, it is precisely because the EU at the last minute to come up with its own emission reduction targets, so that the negotiations deadlock.　　He hopes the EU will "change its mind" in the last two months. However, in Bangkok, the author privately asked the EU environmental director Jung-Mazger (Artur runge-metzger), the EU is likely to turn back, he explicitly replied: "Impossible." "In this context, it is not surprising that the Danish secret negotiating text has been released." This article comes from Hu Shuli our network