Experts say property tax on legislative agenda to stabilize house price dispute

Rumor has it that the property tax has been in the wind for several years.　　25th, the Chinese government network announced the State Council forward Development and Reform Commission on the 2009 to deepen the work of economic restructuring notice, the notice again to deepen the real estate tax reform, research levy property tax. Some experts believe that the notice is actually a property tax on the study of the legislative agenda, I believe the new tax will not be introduced for too long.　　In other words, the long-term stay in the theoretical exploration level of the property tax, this time really will come. Exposure to the wave of residential commercialization, the levy of property tax on each of our vital interests. Because of this, the news aroused the unprecedented social opinion of the imagination and controversy. Will the property tax, which is gradually approaching, really reduce the price?　　What will happen to our living and financial thinking?　　Can the levy of property tax really tame the housing price?　　Over the past six years, property tax levy finally farewell to the theoretical stage, at the policy level mentioned the agenda. On the impact of the property tax, as early as this idea was set up, there is one of the most appealing rhetoric: property tax is the means to curb the rise in house prices. More specific estimates that, after the levy of property tax, about 40% of the housing prices can be reduced ——— after conservative saying that the decline is 20%.　　I think this is just a blind optimism, wishful thinking. First of all, from the original intention of the establishment of this tax, it is to change the status of the housing to maintain the light tax, restraining the investment behavior of the house, by restraining demand and stabilizing the price. But in recent years, the sudden upsurge of real estate investment behavior has its profound social background. The rapid release of market demand in the early stages of urbanization led to a sharp rise in house prices, which is an intrinsic driving force for long-term investment. In this context, there are two forces in the long-term investment of real estate can not be ignored: one is to invest in real estate to make up for the lack of social security functions, investment for retirement. The other is the gray income stratum, the real name of the deposit and the lack of investment channels, so that the investment has become almost the only shadow income of the safe channel. For these two groups of people, long-term holdings, the pursuit of rental income and asset preservation, is the main purpose of its investment. The imposition of a property tax is indeed able to add to the cost of the residential sector, but in a market which is less than the demand, the most likely result is that the tax rate will be transferred to the lessee on the rent.　　The real estate tax can reduce investment demand to what extent, still need to wait and see, its influence on price can not be blindly optimistic.　　As for the common saying that housing prices may fall by 40% or 20%, it is the premise of the imposition of property tax, that is, the "Ming-rent, positive tax and clearance fees" as set out in the framework of the property tax theory, but I cannot be optimistic about such a wish. First look at the Ming-rent, that is, clear the price of land transfer money. Legend was made from the original delivery to 70. And does not say in the real estate such a demand steel market, the cost reduction and the price decline whether to form the equivalence; It is doubtful that this trip will achieve the desired effect. As we all know, the land is nowAs an important source of finance for local governments, the industry's authoritative media have reported that local governments have pushed developers to the market to bid up the price of land auctions.　　In this context, even if the rent of a delivery and the annual payment is "carrying the general sinking", local governments will do everything possible to maximize short-term benefits. As for the positive tax and the clearance fee, it is a very old topic.　　The complexity of the real estate tax relationship can be said to be unprecedented, in the past few years the industry has a saying-a development process needs to cover more than 100 chapters, pay dozens of kinds of tax. Whether the levy of real estate tax can straighten out these relations at once is doubtful. Years ago, I worked with the housing reform senior people to discuss the source of high housing prices, speaking of various and obviously repeated charges, ask whether the cancellation. He said that many departments of people rely on this part of the cost of maintenance, the fee is good to cancel, how do people do?　　Flash ten years, all kinds of fees did not subtract how much, and "wool out in the pig", by ordinary buyers bear these unreasonable tax situation is still not changed. Analysis to this point, for the property tax levied after the housing prices, I clearly can no longer optimistic attitude. Even so, I still support the imposition of this tax. Because only by discovering problems and actively seeking solutions, can society achieve the hope of fairness and progress. What I want to say is that a prescription can only cure a kind of glass. such as real estate tax, as long as the role of stabilizing the market and social equity is enough. As for the reduction of house prices, it needs to be delivered to a scientific and rational policy system to solve, but also the result of various power games. The more hope there is of this tax, the more disappointment will be.　　In particular, it is worth the attention of the financial department, we must not be able to reduce the price of this can not immediately appear as a result of the determination of tax rates and the basis for the scope of collection, otherwise, for ordinary people, housing prices did not fall, no reason to add a real estate tax, it is not　　Idling indicates that there are still obstacles. Experts predict the short-term idling will continue to the early stage property tax "idling" pilot process exposed China's current levy on property tax still face obstacles. First, we need to establish a perfect real estate registration system.　　For example, in Beijing, there are 40% of the House property rights have not been implemented, in addition, a family to many people in the name of home purchase, a large number of housing and other phenomena exist, call the national networking, scientific and perfect real estate registration system, which is also the premise of the establishment of property tax collection system　　In addition, the assessment of the ability to improve the property tax will be the real estate market current tax base, therefore, the efficient use of batch evaluation technology is to obtain all the taxable real estate market present value of the basis, but the number of employees and the level are still to be improved. There is the degree of psychological acceptance of taxpayers.　　Property tax is a new tax, if not to reduce other taxes on the premise of expropriation, the taxpayer lacks the cultural tradition and preparation for property tax, if can not effectively dissolve the resistance of the taxpayer, hasty introduction of property tax, may appear large area owed tax. Based on these factors, experts predict that real estate property tax will be levied at least for some time, and will not completely copy foreign models, the levy will not be too large, the property tax "idling" pilot will continue. (According to Yan Zhao City newspaper reporter Zhang Junhua) Source: CCTV