Keung Electronic letter in violation of the SFC investigation or with the vice chairman of the reduction of

-Our correspondent Jia Xiaoyan this year, this newspaper published "Keung Electronic vice chairman of the large amount of doubt", the article on the Keung electronic vice chairman of the Board of Directors Liu Junliang in the process of reducing the shares of the company did not make any announcement and disclosure of the disclosure, and its violation of information disclosure regulations.　　There was no news that local regulators and the judiciary had filed the case, but a public announcement today showed that Keung electronics had been investigated by the SFC for information disclosure.　　China's Securities and Futures Commission (CSRC) has decided to investigate the company's laws and regulations on alleged breaches of information disclosure, Keung said today.　　Reporters from the regulator learned that as the investigation is not yet over, so the reasons for the temporary cannot be disclosed, and the company's Dong also claimed not to know. Information disclosure violation is not a first offense in fact, information disclosure violations in the Keung electronic terms, is not the fist time. As early as the middle of April this year, Keung Electronics has been due to vice chairman Liu Junliang reduction of 3.42 million but did not notice to become the media and public attention.　　But after being shook out by the media, Keung electronic quickly made a notice, the incident for detailed disclosure, Keung Electronics without the SFC investigation and punishment. How will Keung electronics respond to the question of the SFC and the public in this "recidivism"?　　In the face of the media, Keung Electronics Dong Qincong attack in the investigation of the reason said "do not know", then hurriedly hung up the phone, and then never received.　　After the secretary Qincong to answer questions, the reporter also as investors to Keung Electronic Securities department staff to verify.　　But the Keung electronic securities sector staff also repeatedly told reporters that they did not know.　　As for the Keung electronic attitude to the reasons for being investigated, a person close to the SFC said that, in accordance with the relevant rules and regulations, the Chairman of the Secretary of the listed companies in charge of information disclosure, is one of the direct responsibility, therefore, Dong Qincong attack should know the reason, claiming that "do not know" is a pretext.　　Is it related to the illegal reduction of vice chairman? Some speculate that the investigation may be the April chairman of the Liu Junliang reduction of 3.42 million but no notice of the matter.　　Although the Keung electronic post-announcement was remedied, it was not disclosed at the time of the disclosure and caused losses to investors, so it is not impossible for the SFC to pursue the matter afterwards. In accordance with the provisions of article sixth of the Regulations on the management of information disclosure of listed companies, the time for information disclosure by the person on the company's website and other media shall not be prior to the designated media, and shall not be replaced by any form of press release or response to a journalist or any other forms,　　Interim reporting obligations that should be performed shall not be substituted in the form of periodic reports.　　Therefore, even after the media reports, Keung electronic prompt response to remedy, can not change the violation of the "Listed Companies Information disclosure management measures" facts. In addition, according to the reporter's understanding, vice Chairman Liu Junliang reduction but not disclosed the reason is actually, to the relevant rules and regulations learn not deep enough. So, in addition to Liu Junliang reduction is not disclosed, isAre there any other mistakes that are due to lack of awareness?