Shijiazhuang huaxin reform Burst bidding door

Reporter Shizhiliang Shijiazhuang report "Economic reference newspaper" reporter 25th learned that the afternoon, Hebei Huaxin Group has completed the transfer of property rights in the morning, "the city Sasac and the company signed a contract, I was in the wisdom of the spot dismissed."　　"Group general manager Shangqiang said.　　However, in the more than 60-year-old Hebei large state-owned enterprises Huaxin Group transfer process, a strange transfer clause was alleged to have obvious exclusivity, huaxin workers to the "Economic reference newspaper" reporter reflected in the transfer process even related transactions.　　Reporter recently found in the field interview, as the transfer of the main Shijiazhuang Sasac and transfer platform of the Hebei Provincial property Rights Trading Center in the focus of the interpretation of the provisions of the obvious differences. Key seventh section of May 14, Hebei Run-Germany Logistics Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Run de") received a notice from the Provincial property Rights Trading Center, was informed that "due to the submission of incomplete registration materials, and in the center requested within the period of time did not make up with the company to reach a consensus on the creditor's rights,　　So do not have the state-owned property rights of Huaxin Group. Run de head depressed told "Economic reference newspaper" Reporter: "The registration material is not complete actually means that we did not and Bo Tai Company on the creditor's rights matter to reach agreement, but we feel that the seventh section of the transfer notice is unfair!"　　"The time was set at the end of last year when the transfer announcement was issued.　　Main hardware mechanical and electrical business huaxin Group in the late 90 into trouble, in 2002 due to indebtedness and closed, by the rental site to pay workers, the majority of its own land and plant has already been mortgaged. Reporter from the Hebei Province property Rights Trading Center website to November 26, 2009 issued the "Hebei Huaxin Group of state-owned property transfer notice", in terms of the transfer to see the focus of the seventh paragraph, "The transferee shall be with Huaxin Group subsidiary Friendship Company Creditors ——— Bo Tai Company on the issue of debt agreement.　　"The registration period for the notice is November 26, 2009 to December 23, 2009."　　According to the person in charge, run de Group on December 23 registered under the Huaxin group state-owned property transfer project, and in accordance with the notice required to pay 50 million yuan margin and registration materials. "The next day, December 24, the Provincial property Rights Trading Center issued a letter to tell us that in the deadline, including run Germany, the two companies intended to enroll the recipient, and that we do not produce a letter from the company's certification."　　said the person in charge.　　Run Germany group immediately to the Hebei Province property Rights Trading Center to make the case, pointed out that the transfer notice marked "to be with the Bo Tai Company on the issue of debt agreement" is the fact of the transferee, rather than "intent of the transferee." "It's a paradox!" If we are already the assignee, naturally have the obligation to huaxin debt, but we have not yet won the final bid, with what in advance and Bo Tai to achieve the same?　　Said the head of the Run de.　The situation of embellish Germany did not convince the provincial property rights trading Center.　The reporter from Shijiazhuang City Sasac's core personage learned, February 3, 2010, Hebei Province property Rights Exchange Center issued to the city Sasac, "on the confirmation Huaxin Group Property Transfer Intention assignee qualification of the letter." "The letter clearly stated that Hebei CIIC Investment Co., Ltd. (another intent to be the assignee) for the qualified intention of the assignee, Hebei run Germany Logistics Group Co., Ltd is not a qualified intention of the assignee. "The reason is that the latter did not meet the seventh paragraph," the person said. "" The Provincial property Rights Trading center President Wangbiao with a lawyer came to the city Sasac, said first and the city Sasac communication, never rumored. As a result, two companies knew the next day.　　The person told the economic reference newspaper reporter.　　May 14, the Provincial property Rights Trading center Shangrund and CIIC-wei company respectively sent a qualification notice to inform the former because they did not make up for the material and unqualified qualifications, the latter has the sole qualification, and urged the latter "as soon as possible with the assignor to deal with the transfer of property rights."　　Reporter noted that, Bo Tai Company is not Huaxin group's only creditor, Shangqiang told reporters, from the asset assessment, Huaxin group owed 317 million yuan, in the court to start the implementation of the program also has 17. According to people familiar with the matter, "the biggest creditor is ICBC, which even has more than 100 million interest."　　"Why does the company that owns only more than 16 million of the claims have special treatment to be written into the transfer notice?" Municipal Sasac in charge of the bankruptcy system of the Board of Supervisors Chairman Meng Suying this to the economic reference newspaper reporter explained: "Bo Tai's creditor's rights most dazzling, in the workers reacted the most." Bo Tai's creditor's rights in the provincial High Court, forced to perform several times, early in the city uproar. The enforcement of other creditors and the impact on Huaxin are not big Bo Tai. Bo Tai launched the implementation process may directly lead Huaxin group of friendship Company closed. Meng Suying told reporters, because Bo Tai spent more than 9 million bought Huaxin's claims, some workers think this is the sale of state-owned assets, reaction is very large.　　Huaxin Group of many employees in the provincial High court pronounced execution procedures after the containment of the provincial High Court, then the provincial High court revoked the verdict.　　A mysterious coincidence. Suspected associated transaction journalist from Hebei Province Industry and Commerce Administrative Bureau to consult the business license of the enterprise legal person, found the company was founded on December 2, 2009, the legal representative is a "Li Yuxian" lady. and Shijiazhuang Industrial and commercial administration issued by the Bo Tai Investment Co., Ltd. Enterprise legal person business license also impressively appeared "date of establishment: April 14, 2006" and "legal representative: Li Yuxian" words.　　From the identification number, the two Li Yuxian are the same person, until May 2009, Bo Tai's legal representative changed from Li Yuxian to Wuzheng, close to tell reporters that the two people are related. Ciic and Bo Tai Company's legal representative is very deep, the establishment of the date is in the transfer announcement within one week.　　This let including run Tak and huaxin workers, including the various parties expressed puzzled. "That's the second thing we think is unfairReason。 Another intention of the enterprise and the announcement of the key creditors in most of the time is the same legal person, it is clear that the establishment of wisdom Granville is to let Huaxin group.　　"Run de head very helpless, he told reporters, transfer notice after he tried and Bo Thai contact, but the other side ignored."　　Some huaxin employees of Bo Tai Company and the Sino-Wisdom Granville Company has a suspicious relationship between the very big opinion. "We do not believe in Ciic, Ciic and Bo Tai is a boss!"　　"22nd, Huaxin's Liu surname workers told the economic reference newspaper reporter."　　More employees questioned the newly established CIIC-Wei company did not take over Huaxin group and its more than 1000 employees of the ability and qualifications. "The company that is going to accept us should give Huaxin's staff his strength, and we hope to conduct an inspection on the CIIC."　　"Huaxin Group subsidiary Friendship company surnamed Li told reporters, but in the wisdom Granville always in Huaxin's staff to remain mysterious." "At the end of 2008, early 2009, the Municipal Employees ' Union is responsible for the settlement of the policy of the comrades to preach to us, tell us which enterprises are qualified to take over huaxin, they need to have three consecutive years of profitable business performance and good Faith Records," a friendship company Cai surname teacher excitedly told the economic reference newspaper reporter, " And in the wisdom of the Wei completely not this qualification!　　"The reporter in Shijiazhuang during the interview several times in contact with the legal representative of Chi Wei have no fruit, 23rd contacted the legal person's secretary, was told Lee always in a meeting, unable to be interviewed." Conflict in disregard of the provincial SASAC meeting minutes, property rights Trading Center urgently promote the transfer according to the "People's Republic of China bidding law 18th", the tenderee may not be unreasonable conditions to limit or exclude potential bidders, may not be discriminatory treatment of potential bidders.　　Huaxin transfer in the process of the potential assignee repeatedly because of the seventh paragraph is alleged not to be eligible, the official explanation is what? The announcement of the transfer was formulated by Shijiazhuang Sasac, Meng Suying that the municipal Sasac in the announcement of the inclusion of the seventh paragraph is not intended to become the intention to set restrictions, but only in the exercise of the right to inform, "Huaxin Group has a certain debt problem, the assignee must know Huaxin group has such a big flaw, no matter who is connected, Have to solve the problem.　　"May 20 afternoon, Meng Suying in his office told the Economic Reference newspaper reporter." An unnamed legal person told reporters that the city Sasac added this provision is somewhat abrupt, but not greater than, "the transfer of the conditions of the third article stipulates that the new company must take the entire debt of the original enterprise, which has included and Bo Thai Company's debt." Although undertaking debt does not represent immediate debt repayment, the assignor has undoubtedly put Bo Tai in a relatively unique position. The legal profession also pointed out that the terms of the assignment should not be a barrier to potential transferee's entry into the bidding process.　　This is close to the city Sasac explanation.　　However, the Provincial property Rights Trading center of the understanding and municipal Sasac different. Wangbiao, President of Provincial property Rights Trading CenterIn accordance with the transfer of the assignor ——— that the city Sasac's transfer conditions to audit the intent of the transferee, "in line with the terms of the transfer of qualified intention of the transferee, does not conform to the unqualified intention of the transferee."　　"21st morning, Wangbiao in the provincial Sasac 2 floor told the economic reference newspaper reporter." According to the core sources of the city's Sasac, because of the understanding of the seventh article, Geozhoping, director of the city Sasac personally ran to the provincial property rights Trading Center to explain the attitude of the city Sasac, "two consecutive weekend director to explain", the person patted the memo to the "Economic reference newspaper" reporter said, " Our attitude is very clear: the seventh paragraph after becoming the final assignee to execute! "In this respect, Wangbiao denies that," the city Sasac only told me two potential assignee to have the different understanding to seventh article, but Geozhoping individual did not explain to me how to enforce the seventh section. "In the absence of an explanation, we strictly follow the announcement of the assignment that the two companies should be in agreement with the company when they sign up."　　"Wangbiao. "February 3, Wangbiao told us that there was a registration company because seventh paragraph failed to become a qualified intention of the assignee, we explained to the provincial SASAC that the seventh paragraph is the intention of the assignee to be the assignee must meet and accept the conditions." The provincial SASAC also convened a meeting on April 23 about the transfer of state-owned property rights in Hebei Huaxin group.　　The competent department of the Hebei Provincial property Rights Trading Center is the provincial Sasac.　　"Economic reference newspaper" to get the meeting minutes, in the city Sasac and the provincial property Rights Trading center of the main leaders (including Wangbiao) have participated in the case, the meeting agreed to two applicants in accordance with the announcement requirements as soon as possible to enter the bidding (review) procedures. "Now Wangbiao denied a lot of things, the city Sasac are recorded in the hand."　　The person added meaningfully. The reporter found that some of Wangbiao's words and reporters to get the material between the discrepancy. In the reporter cross-examine May 14 to the city Sasac and the company sent a letter on the determination of the only qualified intention of the Wangbiao, "we only tell two companies, one for qualified, another unqualified." "And in fact, the reporter in the investigation obtained the Hebei provincial property Rights trading Center issued the" on the transfer of state-owned property rights of the Hebei Huaxin Group of the relevant matters, "the Hebei Huaxin Group of state-owned property transfer only to produce a qualified intention of the transferee" words impressively in the eye.