Spam message into chronic disease specimen and legislation to promote the real-name of mobile phone

This reporter CFRP is a year "3.15", the spam message again became the focus of domestic mobile phone users complaints. In recent years, spam messages, fraud messages and other problems intensified, has not been completely eradicated. In order to completely eradicate this problem, the Ministry of Law issued last year, "mobile phone real-name." Half a year has passed, "mobile phone real name" can be strictly enforced?　　What is the role of the treatment of spam messages? The user information is leaked blame the real-name of the mobile phone based on the deployment of the Ministry of Communications, starting from the beginning of last September 1, the implementation of mobile phone, request the purchase of prepaid mobile card users, must provide the operator with authentic identity documents, genuine name registration; Previous prepaid customers are required to supplement the registration of　　But from the actual situation, in recent years, the user information has been leaked cases have occurred, which let "I can give you a real name, you can give me security" become a lot of mobile phone users of the true voice. It is understood that the mobile phone real-name implementation of six months, in fact, did not realize the original idea of the fight against a variety of spam messages, harassment of users, but because the user to provide identity cards increased the risk of privacy disclosure.　　There are users to reflect, although they are very much in favor of real-name, but after implementation, the phenomenon of harassment has not been resolved, but even received harassment calls. In addition, users in the Internet, play games, download software, but also may encounter viruses, traps, resulting in their own information, privacy was leaked out. Not long ago, Apple vetoed a software upload to the App Store because the software involved privacy leaks. It is reported that the software requires users to enter their own mobile phone number, and then will send the collected mobile phone number to advertisers, advertisers will be based on positioning to send ads.　　Apple finally banned the software.　　Visible, the user information is leaked the way is diverse, but because some operators, the use of technology and rights, the disclosure of user information, such behavior so that users lack of trust in operators, but also easier to disclose the reasons for the privacy of all operators blamed on the operator, blame the real-name system.　　Mobile phone real-name implementation encountered heavy resistance with the development of technology, mobile phone will be more and more intelligent, for people to provide more and more applications, such as mobile phone payment, account management and so on need to use real name information services and technology will be more and more, in this case, the implementation of real-name system will realize the user rights, information effective insurance. Although the real name has been implemented for more than half a year, but in reality, in Beijing, Fuzhou, Chongqing and other cities, street kiosks, operators and other places, can see the anonymous card is still a big line, in the operator's business hall, still a large part of the operators will not voluntarily ask users to show their identity cards.　　Why is China's mobile phone real-name implementation so difficult? First, market competition has led telecom operators to open one eye. Entering the whole business development era, the three major operators of the business, network convergence, in order to expand market share, operators must develop a large number of social agents, agents, etc., to help themselves expandBusiness。 It is in a large number of agents mixed, resulting in these channels become anonymous card main sales channels.　　At the same time, the implementation of real-name system needs to be equipped with related equipment, many agents can not do.　　Second, for mobile phone real-name business procedures cumbersome, in addition to the fear of personal information is leaked outside, cumbersome business procedures, so that users do not intended to deal with the true-name business, in this case, if the operator is very strict implementation of the name, the equivalent of virtually increased the threshold for users to handle business　　Third, the real-name business and the users of the real-name business, and did not enjoy the differentiated service, value-added services, and so on, since the two Hao no difference, users will naturally choose procedures simple and not real-name.　　Visible, in the increasingly fierce market competition background, to enable operators to vigorously implement the real-name mobile phone, but also need to add a little "oil." Strengthen the legislation will be mobile phone real-name to implement although mobile phone in reality in the actual situation encountered a lot of resistance, but to see, mobile phone is the general trend. At present, the reason is not to play its effectiveness, the key is not in itself, but in the implementation of the strength is not enough, the relevant supporting policies need to be further improved.　　Around how to let mobile phone real-name real-name, industry experts, scholars have given their own suggestions, everyone's consensus, mobile phone real-name must be legislated. From the experience of foreign countries, Japan to implement real-name mobile phone, the first to implement personal information protection education, at the same time the implementation of supporting personal information laws; Germany's real-name mobile phone audit more stringent, its telecommunications law shows that the application of mobile phone card users, not only to provide residential address, date of birth and related identity certificates,　　and have the obligation to cooperate with operators to check periodically. From the domestic situation, on the one hand, in the absence of legal basis, the operator to forcibly promote the real-name registration of mobile phones is not correct, and, mobile phone real-name involved in many interests, relying on the power of a single operator is difficult to achieve, this needs to improve the corresponding legislation, supervision and other　　On the other hand, although the Ministry of Industry requires the implementation of real-name, but for the implementation of the results do not have the corresponding incentives, punishment measures, which led to the fierce competition in the market operators, can only maintain a vague attitude to the real-name. Undoubtedly, the real-name mobile phone is an important measure for the benefit of the people, and it plays an important role in protecting the legitimate rights and interests of mobile users and promoting the development of communication industry. Government, regulatory departments, operators and so on should act quickly, the introduction of relevant policies, regulations, the real name of the mobile phone truly fell into place, play its role in the application.