Talking about the mistake of the telecom fee to be a package year Xiao Cui apologized for the slip of the tongue

Cui was in a bad mood yesterday. As a member of the CPPCC, he was interviewed in the CPPCC, talking about China Telecom charges higher than the United States, his words were enthusiastically reproduced on Weibo, support rate is very high. However, he mentioned the U.S. telecom tariff data, the wrong "monthly" fee as a "package year."　　Someone on the microblog pointed out his mistake, yesterday, Xiao Cui through micro-blog to admit the error, and overnight to the newspaper interview, for a slip of the tongue sincere apology. Cui recently in the CPPCC meeting to interview, when it comes to the issue of telecommunications charges, he said: "Our phone bill is what is going on, in the end which should be collected, which should not receive?" Los Angeles in the United States mobile phone charges are 9.9 dollars, the package for a year, you believe it? In fact, I am very tolerant, you have to have a reasonable reason, let us know, in China to call so expensive, we recognized. "Cui's words to say that the people are eager to reduce the voice, but the United States mobile phone charges-9.9 dollars a year, quickly by netizens pointed out the wrong. Called "Flying Elephant Net", netizens blog introduced the U.S. telecom charges detailed standards, and on the microblog wrote: "Such information is indeed very shocking impact, I would like to Cui's influence to the two sessions of concern, will be widely disseminated." However, I must say that this is false information, Cui very irresponsible to provide you with false information. "Phoenix Satellite TV reporter Qiuluwei forwarded this micro-blog, and said:" In the accurate facts on the basis of the discussion of the significance.　　"At the same time, some netizens pointed out that the U.S. mobile phone fees in the basic between 19 to 79 U.S. dollars, most one months mobile phone costs around 30 U.S. dollars. Yesterday morning, the reporter contacted Cui, asked about the matter, Cui immediately check their notes in the United States, records found that is wrong. During the day, in the gap between the meeting, he immediately apologized by micro-blog: "Netizens pointed out that I said the United States mobile 9.99 dollars/year of the wrong, back to check the diary is indeed wrong, to everyone apologize!" With regard to us telephone charges, the data published by the United States will prevail. "Near Midnight 12 o'clock, recorded the CCTV's" small cui meeting ", a day did not take a meal cui at this time just had an interview, for their own slip of the tongue apology, and again updated three micro Bo, hope to quickly put the real information out. In his microblog, he wrote: "It is wrong to say that the U.S. phone bill again sincere apology!" Modern society needs responsible citizens. At the same time, the other speeches in the CPPCC meeting, where can not help scrutiny and inaccurate, please netizens, friends, Tongren one by one point out, I also corrected. To speak the truth requires more than courage, but knowledge and professionalism. To be quick is to be sensational! Take a bow!　　Bow again! I did say the wrong thing. American mobile phone 9.9 dollar package year is actually a monthly reporter: Now Weibo on the crazy, hot talk of those words are you say it?　　The questions about housing, taxes, oil prices and telecommunications. Cui: I think it's basically what I said. But some inaccurate, is I said a whole paragraph of words, but the reporter writes when only usesOne or two sentences, the meaning may produce the deviation.　　I only write on Weibo, other places are not myself.　　Reporter: You said that the United States in Los Angeles mobile phone charges are 9.9 dollars a year, Weibo on the people say no, you this data is how to come? Cui: I said it wrong, the monthly subscription Let me say the package year. For this matter, I am in a bad mood today. We usually do the program out of the wrong, the consequences are unimaginable, before doing "tell the truth", I jokingly hurt the audience, later even though apologized, but no matter how to make up, or hurt someone else. I said in the two sessions that the wrong words spread more widely, the impact is even worse. What's more, it's all about state affairs, not where you tell jokes. Whatever the reason, I gave you the wrong information, it's a bit late to apologize, you should know clearly.　　I also in the reflection, must be prudent in the future, I believe that in my speeches and proposals in the two sessions, there are similar mistakes, even if it is unintentional.　　The source of the data is this, the Spring Festival I am in the United States, I use the mobile phone is this tariff standard, eat in a restaurant when I saw a such advertisement, I also asked my friend, equal to three sources, should be 9.9 U.S. dollars monthly. Besides, I feel guilty and moved today. Moved, today, a mobile phone, my two American friends all called, said I was wrong. You say now the information spreads the ability to be many, the instantaneous turn the sometimes bad person to disturb.　　They also made an urgent investigation, sent an email at night, all the information about us telecom charges, and I sorted out the 9.9-dollar charge.　　The media should listen to experts and not only focus on literary and artistic star reporters: and netizens think you are too sharp in the two sessions, you think so? Cui: I'm in the nonpartisan group, we have a lot of fellows in that group, I am particularly willing to listen to them, like the university class, they speak a reasonable, but the reporter is not willing to log their things, netizens do not turn, but I this kind of gold is not high, but was turned more, also very sad.　　So I appeal to the media to listen to them more. Media and netizens are particularly concerned about the literary and art members. In fact, the literary and art members also have a dilemma, you said that the field of those things, such as to say that I am sure familiar with the Spring festival, but the common people will think you a member of the CPPCC, the vision is too narrow, no overall situation concept. If there are other areas of the problem, it is really insiders, such as I said affordable housing, said one hours, until the experts say three minutes, more than I know.　　I remember that I used to be a huddled expert on Weibo. Just recorded "Little Cui Meeting" interviewed three Academy of Social sciences experts, give me a serious lesson: treat academic issues, grandstanding easy, say two words, let everyone attention you, easy, but down-to-earth academic achievements to make, let the peer satisfaction, may be to spend a lifetime of energy. Today, I asked them in the interview that the community's assessment of "experts"Not high, why don't you come out often, they say, first, the media likes to take it out of context, so they don't want to deal with it; second, they say that science and social sciences problems can only be described in a professional language, can not be popularized, can not be changed into crosstalk.　　So, they choose to express themselves enthusiastically in the academic seminar.　　Two proposals are temporarily "confidential" until after the two conferences and then publish the Reporter: You are in the interview quotes in the vibe, but your proposal this year, as if not seen reported. Cui: I have two proposals that I haven't told reporters. This is not to keep secret, just hope that the two councils will be announced later, if I say now, maybe we can not understand why I want to mention such an unpopular problem, and everyone hot talk about things, why not mention prices, protection of housing such.　　In fact, I have been in the two sessions for four years, such a proposal in the NPC and CPPCC, particularly many, high quality is also very much, and members of the Bills Committee on the proposal to focus on a little better. Reporter Jin Li Wei xiao Cui CPPCC quotations Monopoly Enterprise income distribution Why don't we just remove the monopoly industry. We should consider which industries are worth monopolizing? Which industries are not worth monopolizing? Apart from the need to monopolize the industries involved in national defence and security, other industries can be completely solved by the market, and restricted income can only be used to cure the symptoms. I just went to Los Angeles and found that the oil price is two yuan cheaper than China. I think, PetroChina, Sinopec What's going on here? How do you play?　　Even play out the loss, can change me when Mister, try for six months, I will give you back! Tax starting point law it is unreasonable to levy taxes in a "one-size-fits-all" manner. Should be every city, every industry is different. For example, Cui, one months to earn 30,000 dollars, you levy his tax, may be appropriate. But a coal miner, earning 8000 dollars, should not be taxed. He was in a desperate thing.　　Coal miners will "tie the head to the waistband", he went in (the mine) will not necessarily come out, I entered the studio will be able to come out. Developers of the moral blood I think everyone should be in the blood vessels of "moral blood", the government is the same. If the developer "moral blood" is not enough, the government should help them to blood transfusion! Is there any reason for the government to have high prices? Your land transfer is not high?　　If the high, also must check the moral blood enough. The number of affordable housing in the year has been increasing, whether it is in numbers or proportions, but we are never satisfied. Why? Only said this year to do 10 million sets, 5 years 36 million sets, it is impossible to measure whether this number is more or less, is fast or slow ... Now the so-called affordable housing, are very remote, this does not guarantee the meaning. Because people who live in affordable housing, are not well-off people, you also forced him to buy a car? The so-called housing, is not a concept of sleep. If the room is only sleeping, it is no different from the cave, housing is connected with education, medical and so on. Affordable housing should be in the city center, so it can also ease public transportpressure. A lot of affordable housing in New York and Los Angeles is in the city centre, close to public transport. In the United States, Canada to see affordable housing, with a garden, with a swimming pool, the only difference is that there is no property rights, is rented out.