China's core competitiveness and great power status do not match the labor quality is not high

China network Beijing October 25 (reporter Cheng San) 2010, "National Competitiveness of the Blue Book" published in Beijing today, the blue Paper pointed out that China's core competitiveness and the status of the great power is not consistent with the high-end talent index, education and health index and other developed countries have a big gap. October 25, "China National Competitiveness Report" published a seminar and 2010 Sun Zhifang "Youth Elite Scholarship Award ceremony" held in Beijing, the activities of the Sun Zhifang Economic Science Foundation, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Center for Urban and Competitiveness, Cass Institute of Finance and Trade economics,　　The Social Science Literature Publishing house co-sponsored the 2010 "National Competitiveness Blue Book", chaired by Dr. Dr. Ni Pengfei, and pointed out that science, technology, talent, education and culture are the core of national competitiveness. In terms of total human resources, China relies on its large population to rank 1th in the G20 countries and is far ahead of other countries. This benefits from the increasing popularity of China's higher education. But the human capital composition index, which can reflect the human capital level of a country, is ranked 18th in five consecutive years, indicating that the value is only 1/12 in the United States, 1/10 in Japan and the gap is very large. The quality index of human resources reflects the proportion of undergraduate education, skilled personnel, engineers and scientists. 2004-2008, the United States, Japan has been high human capital composition index of the first runner-up, Canada from the 4th to 3rd, but also strong competitiveness.　　This shows that China's total human resources is large, but the proportion of skilled personnel, engineers and scientists is very low, the overall quality of the workforce is not high. In terms of education and health, the Blue Book also pointed out that China's education and health index in 2008 was 0.453, ranked 14th in the G20, compared to 2004 2, the progress is more obvious, but the gap with the EU countries is still very large. China's higher education enrolment rates, the number of doctors per thousand and the proportion of improved health facilities have shown a greater disadvantage, which is incompatible with China's status as a great power. In particular, China's higher Education Index has been ranked 4th, after the European Union, the United States and Japan, but the index is less than 1/10 of the EU, and only 1/3 of the United States, a big gap. The world famous University mainly concentrates in Europe, the United States, the European Union as the overall superiority is very big, other countries in this index and the European Union disparity is very big.　　Although China has developed into a large country of higher education, the number of universities is large, but the overall level is not high, especially the lack of a group of world-class universities. In the financial system, the Blue Book argues that the top three countries of the 2008 global financial system were the United States, Canada and Japan, followed by Britain and Germany. China ranked 12th at the bottom, but in the last five years China's rankings have been rising, in 2004 and 2005 in 18th Place, and 2007 to 11th. Although progress has been rapid, the financial system index is still low, not comparable to the United States. In addition, China's deposit and loanThe interest rate is higher than other countries, which indicates that China's banking industry has higher profit margins and is conducive to the development of finance. In terms of science and technology, the Blue Book holds that China's science and Technology Index ranked 6th in the G20 countries in 2008, lagging behind the US, Japan, the European Union, Germany and South Korea, but the index is less than one-third of the United States. China's steady rise from its 10th place in 2004 to 6th place in 2008, and the rising index, suggests that China's technology has improved over the past five years. The top three in the number of prestigious research institutions are the United States, France and Germany, and China has been in 7th place. The number of famous scientific research institutions in the United States is up to 329 and China is 61. As an important tool and embodiment of High-tech development--the number of supercomputers in the rankings, China ranked 7th place, lower than the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Japan.　　In 22,008, China has 15 units in the 500-strong supercomputer, the 1th-largest in the United States. In the cultural and artistic competitiveness, the blue Book that 2004-2008, the European Union, Japan, the United States of the cultural competitiveness of the top three. China rose from 5th place to 4th place, slightly higher than Britain and Germany. The world's largest number of cultural heritage is the EU, reached 284, followed by Italy (44), China (38) occupies the 3rd place in G20. The Blue Book predicts that with the rise of China, the attractiveness of Chinese culture will become stronger and more likely to develop into a powerful cultural power in the future.