Player Focus: Warcraft Seal Gate GM explains the loophole

Everyone thought that when World of Warcraft reopened, all the controversy will return to calm, but did not expect more and more things to let netease a bit unprepared, but also let the majority of players more impatient. Play games, be sealed, the game company to seize the number of players do not give reasons. It seems that the domestic game environment is a commonplace thing.　　At least until 20:00 on March 24, 2010, NetEase company thinks so. What if it's sealed? Call Customer service? Complaints？ What if all this is done?　　Most players choose to be silent or re trained, but the World of Warcraft players have opted for a different way of shouting their own voice. March 24, 2010, an ordinary player due to NetEase's seizure of their own game account and issued a post query. According to the information in the post, the player has a small friction with a guild in the server before the number of letters, so he suspects that it is due to the association's collective complaints.　　The reason for NetEase is that the account is suspected of fraud. All players who have played the World of Warcraft know that as long as 20 people in the game complain about your illegal operation.　　So sorry, at least most of the waiting for you will be the seizure account. How much effect can a post have? At least no one would think that this post summoned tens of thousands of players in the voice server to denounce NetEase company.　　However, not as some media have described, the player gathers a riot, on the contrary, every player on The voice server is reasonably sensible and makes sense. Perhaps it is because netease arbitrary seal number of grudges too deep? So what is the reason for NetEase to stop blocking a player's account? What is the reason for the player's grudge against NetEase so deep? The hunter found the account was sealed things in fact, the past is very simple, a hunter with the usual like a gold regiment played a copy, and the team had a little friction, then he came to the iron stove to express their dissatisfaction.　　Anyone who plays Warcraft should know what's going on. The 2nd day, the hunter immediately found his account was seized, NetEase gave the reason is suspected name fraud.　　The hunters who have been surfing the internet in their own home believe that they have not been stolen or in the Trojan, the only reason for speculation is because of their own brush the team's complaints.　　Subsequently, the hunter in the game's well-known forum on the issue of the denunciation of the post, that NetEase unilaterally because the complaint is not reasonable, immediately gathered a large number of players for NetEase's arbitrary seal to denounce.　　That afternoon, the hunter was sealed off the account, NetEase related to the Hunter, and explained the reason is not due to a number of complaints, but because the hunter suspected in the third party trading platform on the gold coin transactions, and the gold coins suspected of theft. Too much doubt about the incident, so far, Sina game did not contact any NetEase related public relations personnel.　　But from what the player describes, there is a lot of doubt. One, although netease with individual hiddenPrivate reasons for refusing to interview the relevant media.　　But as a hunter's personal privacy, NetEase company also did not provide to the matter person related to seal the evidence. Second, NetEase to give the reason is suspected of stolen gold coins, then why in the theft of the incident has not been resolved before, NetEase company and easy to solve this number? On-line GM explains the reason for the Seal No. Three, voice server someone has claimed to be NetEase staff (identity can not verify) explanation, the number was due to the technical staff confirmed suspected irregularities, and later the reason for the solution is to verify that there is no violation?　　NetEase without any communication before the exchange, how to judge unilaterally whether the gold coins suspected? Four, a lot of players in the account after the theft, ask customer service personnel can recover stolen gold, netease customer service staff gave the answer is temporarily no relevant ability to track the gold.　　Then how can netease have the technology to find the Hunter account on the source of gold? Five, NetEase online customer service explanation, suspected name fraud refers to the relevant players after the report, the technical staff after the seizure.　　But NetEase's GM contacted the hunter, but said no relationship with the player report. The player requests very simple throughout the interview process, Sina game has not contacted NetEase related staff, the public relations telephone has not been answered, perhaps NetEase convened the emergency meeting, but from the matter development to now has passed nearly 5 hours, netease aspect has not any response.　　We do not want to but can only regret to guess, or this thing is not enough to let NetEase pay attention to the launch of the crisis public relations system.　　And in the process of communication with the players, Sina game reporters only feel really only once our manuscript that sentence: Players so good, where to find? No player proposed to NetEase to compensate consumers of the rights, no player proposed to netease what punishment?　　All players only hope that NetEase can have the relevant personnel to explain the reasons for the letter, apology.　　Unfortunately, although NetEase admitted to the wrong number, until the press, the players still did not wait for a sentence: sorry.　　NetEase "Sit" punish the player?　　According to part of the voice server in the player reflects, their own in the Fimis server in support of the Hunter and denounce netease arbitrary seal number of the account, also by NetEase as a violation of the reasons frozen. The player said that he did not do malicious brush screen and other acts in the relevant server, do not know why the number is sealed? Does NetEase want to use "sit" to punish the player and use this alert to block the player's mouth? Player-supplied screenshot of message