Property Tax News One day a new round of regulation focus

News of the "property tax" has been repeated. According to the May 23 "Huaxia Times" reported that the national Development and Reform Commission officials said: "Within three years to avoid the property tax." "and May 24, there are experts to refute," as long as the market allows the property tax can be levied at any time. Jia Kang, director of the Finance Science Institute at the Ministry of Finance, also said: "Three years without talking, that's what the researchers say, and it doesn't represent the authorities." "Once caused the controversy of Shanghai will levy a" property tax ", in recent days, almost one day a" face ", momentarily seemingly ready to appear, sometimes seemingly dystocia, even appeared" immortal fight "situation.　　Whether the recent introduction of a "property tax" is true or false is a foggy one. No matter whether the levy on Shanghai is temporarily shelved or will soon be implemented, there is no doubt that the debate and game surrounding the "real estate tax" is becoming increasingly fierce, and it is considered a matter of time before the pilot is introduced.　　In the strict regulation of the policy, some local real estate market has been "gripped", "real estate tax" will be overweight at this time, become a new round of the focus of property control.　　In the "real estate tax" before the rumors appear, people are highly concerned about the same sword refers to the "property tax", after all, the tax in some places has been idling for 7 years, but interestingly, the parties to the "property tax" attitude is not as sensitive as the "real estate tax". A little attention will reveal some clues. Although idling for several years, "property tax" is still facing the introduction of legal and technical barriers, China's "Legislative law" clearly stipulates that the imposition of new taxes and adjustments to the old tax must be approved by the NPC. Industry insiders stressed: The introduction of property tax, must first pass legislation into law through the NPC, although in the long run is a good tax, but.　　"In addition, the" property tax "mainly for real estate tax, and the current property rights recognition, asset assessment, data platform and other basic work is not perfect.　　Comparatively speaking, the "real estate tax" specially aimed at housing is faced with these problems in different degrees, but "operation" seems to be easier, and can be quickly "used for me", so it is easy to hit the nerves of the market. "Easy operation" stems from "real estate tax" is not a new tax. The provisional regulations on real estate tax issued by the State Council in 1986 provide for the exemption of property tax on individual non-business properties.　　As a result, "smart people" think of a workaround, the original property tax legislation to expand the explanation, you can impose a "real estate tax" for many households, rather than take time-consuming and laborious legislative procedures.　　Thus, after the "flexible", "real estate tax" turned into a "property tax" simplified version, more like a rapid "fever" for the housing market expedient. Some local governments have shown high enthusiasm for the levy of a "property tax". As early as the tax in Shanghai, Chongqing is the precedent, first of all, to the high-end property levy "special property consumption tax." The reason is not difficult to understand.　　For example, this round of stringent regulatory policy, to rely on land finance will cause serious impact, if the introduction of a "property tax", will make up the huge financial hole. Objectively speaking, the levy of "real estate tax" onCurbing speculative speculation and weakening the local government's reliance on land finance will have a certain effect. But so far, there has been a lot of controversy over what to do, what to do, how to levy and how to levy. Supporters believe that there must be no cost and no barrier to land-hoarding to gain value.　　Opponents say the "real estate tax" can not restrain house prices, but will fuel the fire, pushing up prices, because housing prices in the rising phase of the "real estate tax" will be passed on to consumers. The reason for this complex situation is that taxation involves too many people's interests. And where the issue of taxation, should be cautious, especially beware of a trend, that is, when there is no good way, that is, the idea of taxation.　　If its advantage and disadvantage, the legality of the procedure is not fully demonstrated, its legacy of contradictions and negative effects can not be belittled. How can we drive away the "property speculators" and purify the market environment without increasing the economic burden of ordinary people? How to control high house prices, standardize local fiscal revenue, and not "drug" too fierce to make the real estate market injury? How to grasp the degree, test the wisdom of decision-makers. Newspaper commentator Lily Cheng