Zhoujian: Forbes Chinese list this year is a horizontal comparison among the rich

October 28 News, the 2010 Forbes China Rich List Chinese version announced today.　　Mr. Zhoujian, editor-in-chief of the Chinese version of Forbes, said the Forbes Chinese rich list is 3 different than it used to be: The Forbes Chinese web release, a more detailed list, and a horizontal comparison of rich countries. "For example, when it was launched last year, we made a detailed comparison between China's 400 billionaires and 400 US billionaires, and this year we will compare China's 400 billionaires with the US's 400, and India's 100 billionaires, with China's top 100." I think Forbes has a wide range of international horizontal comparisons and historical longitudinal comparisons that no one can compare with us.　　The Zhoujian is expressed during the activity. The following is Zhoujian transcript: Good morning, media friends, ladies and gentlemen, and ushered in the annual China Rich List of the release of China's rich list every year, there are different. What's the bright spot this year? Of course, many people regard the Forbes list as an important indicator of China's industrial economic wealth, hoping to find some changes, grasp the future trends, and even find some opportunities to create wealth. This year I think first of all the biggest difference, this year Forbes Chinese version chooses to use Forbes Chinese network, rather than the magazine to start our 2010 year China Rich List. The second biggest difference, I think we have a more detailed analysis of the list this year, wait a minute. My comrade Mr. Flannery will do more detailed presentations, we will be from the industry, from the macro-economy, from the capital markets, from different cities, different regions, and even different age groups, different levels of education to analyze them. The third big difference, we know that Forbes has a long history of being rich, not only in the United States, in China, in India, in Japan, in Russia, in many G20 countries closely tracking the process of entrepreneurship and the entire local economy of entrepreneurs and the global economic changes are closely related. So Forbes ' Rich list has not only a long history, but also a wide range of international comparisons. Last year, for example, we compared the 400 billionaires in China with the 400 billionaires in the United States, and this year we will compare China's 400 billionaires with the 400 in the US and 100 from India to China's top 100.　　I think Forbes has a wide range of international horizontal comparisons and historical longitudinal comparisons that no one can compare with us. We are in different countries in the world, in the long history, the method consistency above is unique. I tell a little story, I recently read the global research on private wealth has invested a lot of academic papers, many academic papers are the Forbes rich list as a study of wealth distribution an important basis, I believe that at this point Forbes rich List is also unique.　　So what happened to the 2010 Forbes China Rich List is very dramatic, and I think the best interpreter should be our colleague and my friend Mr. Flannery. Thank you!