Billionaire sister Ying a trial death lawyer questioning trial proceedings

On the afternoon of 18th, Ying, who was held in the custody of the house, waited for the belated "verdict".　　Jinhua Intermediate Court judgment, in order to fund fraud, sentenced to the accused Ying death penalty, deprivation of political rights for life, and the confiscation of their personal property. The entire sentencing process was about more than 50 minutes, but as the sentence was 32 pages thick, it took 40 minutes for the judge to read it. Ying never said a word, from the sentencing to the judge handing her the verdict.　　Ying's defense lawyer Zhang told CBN reporters. First of all, in the sentencing scene, apart from the members of the court and Ying parents, not many journalists were present.　　Ying's mother had been weeping, and her father, Wu Yong, was hearing Ying was sentenced to death by shouting "court injustice". In the trial of April 16 this year, defense attorneys chose to plead guilty to Ying.　　But yesterday's verdict did not adopt the opinion of the defender, but found that the defendant's ying not only violated the property rights of others, but also destroyed the state's financial management order, which constituted the crime of raising funds for fraud.　　China's criminal Law 194 stipulates that the crime of fund-raising fraud refers to the illegal possession for the purpose of using fraudulent methods of illegal fund-raising, a large amount of behavior. After the court thought, from May 2005 to February 2007, the accused Ying with high interest as bait, in the name of investment, borrowing, capital turnover and so on, illegally raise 773.395 million yuan to repay the principal, pay high interest, purchase property, cars and personal profligacy,　　Actual fund-raising fraud 384.265 million yuan. But reporters noted that the verdict also did not explicitly involved in the huge capital flows. Before the trial, Ying insisted that all the borrowings, in addition to Ben Ben, is invested in the company's operations.　　The interpretation of the judgement of the first instance is that the accused Ying not only arbitrarily dispose of and squander funds, the huge amount of illegal fund-raising funds I have no record, the company's accounts are also governance confusion, three accounting firms can not be audited. "I didn't expect it to be the result," he said.　　Zhang said, before sentencing he met with Ying, a simple discussion of the case, if the sentence is heavy to appeal. But the afternoon's verdict apparently caught Ying's family off guard. After the verdict, Ying. I asked the caretaker to send her a letter telling her to ' hold on ', to believe in the law, and to have a lot of legal procedures to go.　　"Zhang said.　　Zhang said judging from the verdict, the court judgment is found to be wrong: Many corporate behavior is identified as Ying personal behavior, Ying is normal private lending, can not be identified as fraud, Ying not for illegal possession, but for normal investment, Ying is to lend to the branch, rather than to the public. "The most important thing is that the court proceedings are very subject, and from the trial to the present, it has greatly exceeded the trial limit." We will appeal these topics to the upper courts. Zhang told reporters. Wu Fu claimed that the case was so unfair that it would certainly appeal.