Details determine success or failure

The details determine success or failure is a classic sentence. For example, in your resume, even the words "Ubuntu" and "Struts" are wrong, how can you convince others that you are pursuing code?

Today, attention to the "Jinan trial" news, one day to see a lot of long micro-blog content. But these long microblog productions are very rough, just yesterday complained about this thing:

"There are no 100 or dozens of of the tools or WEB services to grow a microblog." But can achieve the ultimate almost none, in addition to Sina's experimental things are not bad, but also the superfluous suspicion. Demand is simple, is a text transfer picture, technology is not complicated, but there is no good product. 」

Because of some specific reasons, the "long micro-bo" This thing is still weird popular up, with more and more people, there are a lot of can make long micro-blogging tools, but these tools can reach the passing line are very few.

Why do you say that?

Long micro Bo core function is to turn the text content into a picture, there are pictures and text mixed row of the article turned into a picture. The implementation of core functions is not complex, even without tools, I directly in the content of screenshots, but also a long microblog.

Many tools fail to pass the line because they don't think about what the target audience is feeling, for example, for example, some tools to do the long micro Bo, on the computer is "fuzzy", clarity is not enough, the user must make adjustments to be able to see clearly, as for the Retina screen, the basic is "paste".

Not on the computer, of course. Now the vast majority of people browsing micro Bo are using mobile clients, some long micro-bo on the phone to open the screen is not clear, typesetting at all did not take into account the user's use of the scene, a dense piece, hand-magnified, the picture pulled to pull, do not enlarge, read up the eyes are also

Some people will say, on such a few issues, I targeted to do a little adjustment can not reach the standard you said? Not yet. The font is still not up to the requirements, considering the output of the long micro Bo to be able to cross the platform on different devices to achieve a better reading effect, such as Windows, Mac OS X, IOS, Android, this is a systems engineering, and most of the long micro-Bo did not consider these situations.

These are not enough, there is the problem of typesetting, and typesetting needs continuous adjustment and optimization to achieve the majority of people satisfied with the effect. This inside of the doorway and pay attention to say quite a lot of, I am not professional, for the time being not in-depth said, but the proposal can go to know the relevant discussions are read again.

You see I said for a long time, someone must be impatient, "You can do a", I certainly can not be taken to do this thing, after all, I use the solution is very good. What I really want to say is that we haven't done enough in detail.

Who should do better in detail, of course, is our own team. The details of others are good enough to benefit me as a user. And I am eager to expect my team colleagues to value the details.

We often have a variety of big dreams, to change the world, to join large companies, leading a large team, the development of a bull's products ... But these, leaving the details are not going to play. Of course, you can tell me the details are not the most important, I do not want to discuss those, I would like to say that we are to do the details.

For example, you go to a company to find a job, but your resume is not even Ubuntu and Struts these words are wrong, how do you convince others that you have a desire for the code? If you don't proofread your CV, do people believe you want to Review yourself or someone else's code?

For example, you maintain your corporate microblog as an operator-a lot of people say it's not a challenge. But you send a long microblog out of others on the phone can not see clearly, so do not pay attention to details is not. You can say "What's important", yes, but what if you're doing the same thing? The same 140 words, you write it out and modify three times to send out, the effect is different. Attention to detail is what you do.

For example, received a task temporarily to do an activity page, under normal circumstances, "this is not a lot of difficult things", some people at ease, how quickly how to come, neat out, a test, found a pile of problems, modify? There are complaints, long time, and said that such trivial work is no challenge, I have to do more complex things. How can there be no challenge? is the page code clean enough? Compatible with mobile devices? For example, the mobile phone browsing shows normal? How fast and good to complete the design of the response page? Do you have access statistics? Did you deploy early? is Chettu compatible with all devices? What the? None of these people are asking you to do it. So you're not challenging? These trivial things, there is a lot of knowledge to be studied and accumulated. No attention to detail, no accumulation and promotion.

Many people do not want to do repetitive work, that they can not make their progress faster. But we internet practitioners, in fact, rarely face complete duplication of work, you pay a little attention to the details, will often improve these seemingly repetitive and monotonous work, the results of the difference will slowly be very big. The sharpness of detail and the ability to improve as soon as possible can be done any other thing quickly than others.

So, today is not about long Weibo, the details are not enough, improve it.