Absrtact: When the primary school, the class if any children with an electronic pet in the classroom to play, to ensure that a group of children followed, xiaoming! Fast! Fast! Play it for me! , Xiaoming said, no! My father bought it from abroad! ... You play for me! Put
Primary school, when the class of children with an electronic pet in the classroom to play, to ensure that a group of children followed, "Xiaoming!" Fast! Fast! Play it for me! ", said Xiaoming," No! My father bought it from abroad! "..." You play for me! I'll take you to my home to play video games after school! "..." Well then! ”
At that time, just add "electronic" two words, suddenly will be different. In the students of our age, if there is a electronic watch, electronic pets, the home has a video game machine, the electronic organ God Horse, is a force lattice. Therefore, the loading force is from the primary school has been the phenomenon. Of course, the force is not the topic of conversation today.
In fact, the word "intelligent" is also the same as the "electronic" before and after the 90 's, placed in front of a certain noun as the former attribute, in order to achieve "tall" effect. For example: Intelligent hand ring, smart watch, intelligent health scale, intelligent Water Cup, smart piano, intelligent router and so on. There's something in our house, so obviously I'm not attacking the smart hardware industry. But, reasoning, I feel that the word "smart" brings us a "dividend" that is about to disappear quickly. Smart So-and-so will become an electronic so-and-so, so commonplace that people forget.
At least in my opinion, before weighing need to dig (mobile) two (screen) three input (password), four find (APP) five (icon) six wait (connect) All intelligent Health scale, are should be smashed things. We ourselves, in the earlier generation of lemon, used this ridiculous design. Two years from now, we will feel that we are very ridiculous today, just to give something in front of the prefix to make the user so embarrassed products. Moreover, this kind of product still can see every day, they all have a common characteristic, intelligent so-and-so.
Of course, the development of a variety of industries, technology, the intelligence itself must be a gradual process, from this perspective, "intelligent" more like a verb. I do not have any tinted glasses to see and evaluate such phenomena and the past and future of all products, just want to say, all rely on the smart dividend of products and teams, ignore the value of products, rely on the concept of the era has passed.
In the future of intelligent things, especially the gradual spread of intelligent products to the general public, the user will be more concerned about the function of the product itself and experience, so obviously a smart to help the square to collect dirty clothes, washing clothes, laundry, ironing clothes, folding clothes ... The whole process of intelligent so-and-so is the most intelligent so-and-so. Of course, the mother will not care about the first two words, the core focus is always a function of the value of the problem.
At the same time, sensors and communications technology based on intelligent So-and-so, from the data above the service, it will become very low intelligence so-and-so, let alone also need to "dig two strokes three input, four find 5.6 waiting" intelligent so-and-so. If it is such a smart and so-and-so, on the one hand, the need for more accurate sensor data acquisition, experience more sense, two aspects of the data transfer process is more sense, even ubiquitous, what shake can be transmitted data way, is simply weak explosion; three aspects of the application services around the data are more practical and diverse, Obviously from this point of view, it is not enough to rely on one or one or two teams alone.
So in this way, remember the name of a product itself, far more meaningful than remembering a "smart So-and-so", which is why I said, "Goodbye, smart So-and-so!" ”