Interstellar crossing: To see or not to see, the black hole is there

First of all, I'm not a fan of Nolan. I did not list him as a male God because of seeing the Star Trek. The narrative of his film was too lengthy to end hastily. The previous films also have this feature. What you feel is burning, not because of the director or the writer, but because you don't understand some of the theoretical physics in the film.

I reckon Matthew McConaughey and Hathaway may not be able to figure out what the role in the film is talking about.

This article is not a "Star Trek" of the film review, nor is it a cult or spit text, but an understanding of physics (or sobering). Spicy, I'd like to start with Nolan-now that you like the Englishman who is stubborn in the 70mm film IMAX.

Nolan has so far only filmed a brain-burning film, which is "memory fragments." Because of the special narrative of this film, it is very mental for the audience to understand the plot. So, all the movies that Nolan took, you all felt "burning".

Not really. "Midnight chasing the Fierce", "Batman: The Mystery of the Blur", "The Deadly Magic", "The Dark Knight", "Inception", "The Dark Knight Rise", "The Body of Steel" (screenwriter), "Super Test Hacker" (production), these movies you feel the plot is very complex?

The plot is very simple, the narrative structure is also very common. Among them, "The deadly Magic" is relatively speaking in the narrative structure of the design is very good; the Nolan version of Batman is a step in the role-building; Inception is a good idea to win over themes, multiple dreams. "The Body of Steel" in the Superman costume in the shape of a bit of creativity; "Super Test Hacker", cough, I don't judge.

I think that none of the films that Nolan later filmed, from the perspective of "burning the brain", go beyond the fragments of memory. However, from the point of view of pure crushing art creation, Interstellar crossing is a new height.

What is the attraction of interstellar crossing? It's not a story, it's not a show, it's not Nolan, McConaughey, Hathaway. But Einstein's theory of relativity. Without the theory of relativity, there is no black hole, wormhole, time and space passing through these concepts.

What attracts you is a black hole, a wormhole and a time warp. Interstellar crossing is, of course, the most intuitive film to date about black holes, wormholes and time theories.

However, there are many bugs in the movie for the dramatic effect. For example, you can't live in a black hole, or even communicate. In addition, NASA's spacecraft can get rid of the time has slowed the great gravity of the planet is also a bug. Aside from the bugs set up for the plot, some of the physics concepts in interstellar travel are worth remembering.

At the end of the film, Matthew McConaughey's role as Cooper could be in a five-dimensional space, and the robot towers suspected that it was "they" created in a five-dimensional space beyond human understanding to create a three-dimensional space. The performance of the plot is still excellent, but the fact that the five-dimensional space is exactly what kind of film is not given.

What exactly is a five-dimensional space? In XYZ's three-bit coordinates, plus the time and speed axes, this is a five-dimensional spatial frame of reference, it's hard to imagine what it is.

Theoretically, this is easier to understand. Three-dimensional form of the object, the movement of the object formed a time, and the speed of the unit time measurement of the displacement of objects.

In the movie, you'll see that Cooper has a matrix inside the black hole, which is the singularity of the black hole that Cooper is reaching. Not only was he not torn to pieces, but he floated peacefully in space. Aside from the plot-design bug, Nolan's space-time matrix is illuminating: He stretches the axis of time alone to allow people to see everything that has happened in the past.

But note that the picture still follows a theory commonly espoused by contemporary theorists, that you can go back to the past, but not through the future. And what can travel between time and space? Gravity！ Cooper's way of communicating with him in the past is by gravity: books on the shelves are falling, forming Morse code.

Einstein's theory of relativity suggests that time passes through a strong gravitational field and slows down. As the black hole gets closer to the singularity, the greater the mass, the greater the gravitational pull. So, the time will be more and more slow. At the entrance of a black hole, time is the same as time on earth, and time slows down to the planet of the great tides in Interstellar crossing: one hour here equals seven years on Earth. This planet is roughly somewhere between the entrance of a black hole and the singularity.

As for why there is a planet around the black hole, this is actually the writer's design. There is no direct evidence of the existence of planets around black holes in astrophysics. But it is certain that, if it exists, the time on this planet will definitely be much slower than the Earth. The closer you get to the black hole, the slower the time becomes.

Time slows down, which means that when you are on this planet, will the hands of the watch walk slowly? No, anything that happens on this planet will be the same as it is on earth. If the watch pointer slows down, then the human walk will go into the slow motion. Some people think that on the planet around the black hole, time slows down and can be understood in disguise as a slow aging rate. This is actually not accurate enough.

The speed of aging, the movement of atoms, and the hands of a watch are not slow, where an hour is an hour. But, compared to the Earth, the time here equals seven years. This is because the quality is very large, the time around the black hole has been distorted. So you can see that when the Cooper line reaches the planet around the black hole, the wreckage of the crew that left the team that crashed a few decades ago floats in the same place--that is, they've just arrived soon.

Record a sidewalk at a crossroads with a high-speed camera and watch the slow motion at 1200p/s speed. Although the flow of people at this time is very slow, but in the time of time, they are walking at normal speed.

The wormhole in the movie is also instructive. In textbooks, it is portrayed as a hole in order to explain the theory of wormholes. The universe is shown in a two-dimensional plane. In reality, the universe is three-dimensional, so the wormhole in the three-dimensional world should be a sphere. Visually this sphere, you can see a distorted picture of the universe on the other side of the wormhole.

In interplanetary passage, wormholes are still described as a conduit. The spacecraft is in the pipeline, which is no different from the previous sci-fi films (such as "hyper-temporal contact"). And the wormhole is not a pipe-like, and there is no conclusion. In fact, wormholes were just hypothetical. Although it is supported by equations, humans have never observed the existence of this quasar.

At the end of the movie, Cooper saw the old daughter. The play was handled in a hurry. His daughter is dying, Cooper unexpectedly warm a few words to leave, drive the ship to find female colleagues. And Cooper's offspring saw his great-grandfather, without any reaction.

After seeing the Star Trek, a lot of people bought three bodies. I have not read this novel, but after watching the film, the first time is to reread the history of time.