Lawyers say "Non 2" is suspected of aiding and abetting suicide writers to supplement the law?

"Non-sincerity Don't disturb 2" movie poster judge and lawyer drink together, public prosecution case should be allowed to withdraw, lawyers for their future to abandon the agent ... Viewers will look at the film and television works in the future, because the writers tell you these facts, may itself be illegal. Yesterday, wrote a letter to Sarft that Feng Xiaogang's work "Non-interference 2" suspected to encourage help others suicide lawyer Yiu Fei accepted this reporter interview. In response to accusations of his own hype, he stressed that he is not opposed to the appearance of illegal film and television works, but the film and television works appear in violation of the right to be right when the "violation of legal knowledge" This is a clear misleading.　　He believes that these writers should supplement the law course.　　Shelling "Non 2" abetting to help suicide should be parked? "Non-Prudential Don't disturb 2" in such a bridge section, Xiangshan suffering from terminal illness, terminally ill, feel alive as dead. Subsequently, Xiangshan's good friend Qinfen said to let him "have the dignity to die", so qinfen in for each other opened a memorial service, accompanied by a fishing boat Xiangshan ride to the sea.　　Qinfen will suicidal intent is very strong, wheelchair can not self-help Xiangshan pushed to the bow of the fishing boat, and then, Qinfen let go of Xiangshan hand, turned to hide in the cabin, Xiangshan fell into the sea and killed himself. The bridge has sparked controversy. Chengdu Wending Law firm Yiu Fei lawyer yesterday said to the media, "Do Not Disturb 2" of the above story, in fact, constitutes the help of others "euthanasia", whether from our judicial theory or judicial practice, the characters in the drama Qinfen acts constitute "intentional homicide crime." According to the provisions of our criminal law, Qinfen's behavior is suspected of "intentional homicide" because of the causal relationship between the two Yiu Fei. "But the" Non-interference 2 "the whole plot does not think that Qinfen's behavior is a crime, on the contrary revealed the ' help ' of the virtue of the idea, and suspected of abetting the real life of the people who intend to commit suicide to commit suicide to help the misleading role.　　Yiu Fei said that in order to prevent this bad effect, he has passed the express way to the State administration of Radio and Film Authority, proposed to stop the screening of the film.　　Questioning lawyers for fame hype? Many film and television circles have questioned the accusation of Yao Fei. Director Feng Xiaogang Assistant Zhang Shu think Yiu Fei have borrowed "not sincere don't disturb 2" speculation suspicion.　　He stressed that the "Non-interference 2" is the adoption of the State Administration of SARFT film review of the film, there is no problem with the plot, meanwhile, the film Xiangshan is suicide, everyone can see that there is no legal issue of alleged intentional homicide by the lawyer, the director did not consider the issue when filming the film. In addition, the Hunan TV hit drama "Accidentally Fall in love with you," the writer Wang Yi yesterday to interview also think Yiu Fei such a move some grandstanding.　　She believes that the film and television works is a film and television works, Life is life, Yiu Fei to this kind of bridge, in fact, the lack of entertainment spirit, there is no difference between life and film. Has engaged in the film and television planning work "The younger" young writer Dongdongtao said, whether is not the lawyer to take the opportunity to hypeCan not negate the rationality of lawyers ' analysis.　　Although as a film can use different artistic techniques to show the plot, but Dongdongtao that the lawyer is standing for the public moral atmosphere to raise the point of view, the moral bottom line is increasingly missing in the current society is worth paying attention to.　　Lawyers smoking lenses can not have, help people commit suicide but it? The reporter also contacted yesterday the Yiu Fei lawyer who wrote to Sarft. He said, because the day before yesterday just courier to the SARFT, so currently has not received any reply, and they have not contacted the "Non-interference 2" of the production side, because this is the SARFT trial film. For the online questioning of the sound of his hype, he denied that: "I have been a small well-known lawyers in Chengdu, why to hype, and speculation is to take more lawsuits, but I have now basically do not take that kind of lawsuit, I took the public interest litigation, so I do not need to hype?" "Many people in the film and television industry have questioned his lack of entertainment and life and the story, he does not think so," the recent SARFT has not just issued a paper on the ban on smoking? I understand the sarft anti-smoking reasons, it is certain that such lenses will mislead people to smoke, the small tobacco smoke is banned, helping people suicide but it can also broadcast?　　He also stressed that if the SARFT does not give him a response, he is also preparing to apply to the SARFT in recent days, the scale of the public trial, which video screen can not appear, which can appear should be open, so that the public know the SARFT standard of trial. can have bad guys, but the writer can not have no common sense some people say, film and television works is not life, cop or gun fights, there are always negative and adverse, can not have illegal plot? How to guarantee the story of film and television works?　　In this regard, Yiu Fei stressed that he is not against the illegal lens, but against the emergence of illegal lens writers are not fully aware of, "from the" 2, the writer seems to have no idea to help others commit suicide is a crime, but that is to fulfill a friend, this is the crux of the problem. In addition, he said, he found that there are too many violations of legal knowledge in film and television works, almost everywhere. "such as a very famous film, but in the plot, the defense lawyers and judges drink together, this is a violation of legal knowledge, at the trial stage, the judge is strictly prohibited and lawyers in private contact." For example, last year, a very hot TV show, a person was accused of a company's business secret to another company was prosecuted, this person was arrested, but finally the plaintiff's company said the withdrawal, this person will be fine. This also violates the law common sense, since this matter violates the criminal law, is the public prosecution case, how can the plaintiff say that the withdrawal is dismissed? In the end, he mentioned a TV show where the parties ' lawyers knew each other, so one lawyer persuaded the other lawyer to give up his agent for his future. "It's totally illegal," he said. According to the law of lawyers, lawyers can not abandon the parties because of their personal future reasons.　"To this end, Yiu Fei suggested that today's film and television drama writers should complement the legal knowledge class."　To his point of view, some people in the industry agree, Fan Yan, a writer who used to be the broker of Aaron Kwok's Shanghai, said that he should be as careful as possible in his future creations, especially when it comes to Life-and-death themes, and should be more socially responsible. "In violation of the law of common sense" "Wrap" TV series "Wrap", Liu as the plaintiff sued Miao and the U.S.-China company two times, the first Liu withdrew, the second because Liu under 18 years of age and was dismissed for prosecution. These two cases are civil cases, which are disputed by the same judge. However, after Miao surrendered, the prosecutor's office to prosecute the case should be a criminal case. It would be wrong for the presiding judge of the case to be the judge of the original Liu civil case.　　In the modern society, civil cases and criminal cases are different legal procedures, and they must be tried by different judicial personnel in our country. "Do Not Dance with strangers" TV drama "Do Not Dance with strangers" in the case: a doctor in the operation of a lawyer, a suction blood vessels fell on the ground, due to the inability to find substitutes in time, and caused the patient died in the first aid platform. The public security organs in the play arrested the doctor, the procuratorate to the court to prosecute. During the trial, the doctor was called "the defendant" for a while and later called "The criminal suspect", and the sign hanging in front of him was also "the defendant". In our country, the Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that the correct appellation should be "defendant" rather than "criminal suspect" in the trial stage. In addition, the Central Plains trial judge sentenced the doctor to the guilty, and soon after the trial, the judge or the original, and in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, the original trial court to reopen the case, no matter what kind of situation should be composed of a separate bench for trial.