Nearly 90% people benefit from travel tax adjustment

The National People's Congress yesterday reviewed the draft review to absorb public opinion to adjust the New Express reporter Shing After extensive opinion polls, the travel tax bill will make a big adjustment. Yesterday, the NPC Standing Committee again considered the draft travel tax, compared with a review, the same is the tax rate is still divided into seven, the upper and lower limit or from 60 to 5400 yuan. The difference is that, with the exception of the minimum and the highest gear, the tax is reduced in varying degrees. Zhang Balin, deputy chairman of the National People's Congress Legal Committee, explained yesterday that 2.0 litres and the following passenger cars accounted for about 87% of the total number of passenger cars.　　In this way, this amendment is clearly in tune with the public and more inclined to reduce the burden on the working-class. 1.6-liter-2.5-litre owners "benefited" the largest in October 2010, the 17th meeting of the NPC Standing Committee held the first review of the draft travel tax law. After the meeting, the Chinese People's network published the content of the draft, to solicit opinions from the community. One months, the first draft was questioned by all sides.　　The public thinks that the tax on travel taxes has been raised too much, adding to the burden on the masses, with more than half of the views that tax should be lowered. Now it seems that the "brick" effect is obvious. According to the review of the travel tax bill, published yesterday, the base tax on travel taxes has fallen, with 1.6 litres above 2.0 litres, and 2.0 liters above to 2.5 litres. The former from the original 660-960 yuan to 360-660 yuan, the latter from 960-1620 yuan to 660-1200 yuan.　　And more than 2.5 liters is only a slight adjustment.　　Prior to that, the Minister of Finance, Xuren in the description of the draft travel tax bill, 1.6 liters and below the small displacement car accounted for the total number of passenger cars in China 58%, 1.6 liters to 2.5 litres of medium displacement vehicles accounted for about 39%, 2.5 liters of larger and larger vehicles accounted for 3%. The public questioned the small displacement should not be increased tax although this revision has improved, but with the current Guangdong province, the corresponding annual tax is 420 yuan/year comparison, still significantly increase the burden of most car owners. Yesterday's news, there are still many people think the tax should also be reduced, especially at the moment the oil price has "broken eight", the public questioned the 1.6 litres of small emissions should not increase taxes. Some netizens proposed that the travel tax is a property tax, should play a role in regulating residents ' income and alleviating the burden of the working class owner. Now, although not all cars are taxed at the same tax rate, it is not scientific to charge by displacement.　　Under the same emissions premise, the purchase of Chery and Mercedes-Benz people's income is clearly not the same. However, Xuren has also admitted that the basis of the theory of travel tax should be based on the assessment of the value of travel, but the number of vehicles and vehicles dispersed in thousands of households, the value of the evaluation difficult to operate.　　In order to facilitate the collection and administration, the draft was adopted to levy taxes on emissions.　　It is understood that the implementation of the travel tax law also need to pass a national Standing Committee for consideration. Expert opinion the Director of Taxation Department of Lingnan College, Zhongshan UniversityLin Jiang: The attribute is not clear public opinion is not satisfied with the travel tax bill proposed changes appear to be hasty, lack of sufficient tax basis, resulting in the current public questioning sound a piece of embarrassment. First of all, the second modification of the travel tax is high or low, only from its attributes there is a lot of room for discussion. Now the tax on emissions, to adjust the environment as a starting point, this more in close proximity to environmental taxes. So is there any need to announce a tax on automobile emissions that will be investigated? But according to the definition, the travel tax is the property tax, but at present it does not have the function of regulating income.　　In short, whether the travel tax is a property tax, environmental taxes, or a behavioral tax is not clear, it is difficult to avoid the suspicion of repeated taxation.　　RELATED LINKS last year, Guangzhou travel tax revenue of 438 million yuan New Express news reporter Shing Correspondent Ying Zhang did reported yesterday from the Guangzhou local Taxation Bureau was informed that 2010, the board organized travel tax revenue of 438 million yuan, an increase of 9.16% from the previous year. According to the bureau's 2011 travel tax levy, the tax standard was unchanged from last year's.　　The large passenger car (20 or above) is 600 yuan, medium passenger car (nuclear 10 to 19 persons) is 480 yuan, small passenger car (nuclear load 9 person or below) is 420 yuan, the term is one year. Travel Tax (draft) tax Change table exhaust Volume One review tax two review Tax 1.0 liters (including) the following 60-360 yuan unchanged 1.0 liters-1.6 liters (including) 360-660 yuan 300-540 yuan (decrease) 1.6 liters-2.0 liters (including) 660-960 Yuan 3 60-660 yuan (down) 2.0 L-2.5 L (incl.) 960-1620 yuan 660-1200 Yuan 2.5 L-3.0 L (incl.) 1620-2460 Yuan 1200-2400 Yuan 3.0 L-4.0 L (incl.) 2460-3600 Yuan 240 0-3600 Yuan 4.0 liters above 3600-5400 yuan unchanged