Scene Direct hit *st Hongsheng Longchang case the prosecution and the plaintiff to debate whether the export evasion

-Our correspondent Wang Xiaoyu Shanghai, June 3, 2009, *st Hongsheng (600817.SH) and its chairman of the Longchang case, the first Intermediate People's Court in Shanghai Hongqiao Road public hearings. Before this last March, "Securities daily" reporter Yan Ni first disclosed Hongsheng technology chairman Longchang for allegedly Shang by the Shanghai police detained the news.　　Subsequently, this reporter after in-depth investigation, found that Hongsheng technology export Shang with China's export credit insurance companies, and soon the Chinese export Credit insurance company general manager Tang Joshin was dismissed.　　As a result of the Beatles hat has been the Acer Sheng Technology, this newspaper has been very concerned about, and in the court on the day to the scene. "Securities daily" reporter saw that the case of the 7th courtroom space is very small, hanging the national emblem, neat furnishings not only make people feel solemn feeling. A wooden fence was placed before the only 28 spectators.　　According to one of the court's staff, all criminal cases must be segregated.　　9:30, after the presiding judge Mr. Hu Hongchun announced the trial, the trial officially began. Longchang denied the prosecution's three charges as the defendant's Longchang with handcuffs and walked slowly into the courtroom in a suit. The thin face has no past of the high spirits, a slightly downcast face with a peaceful expression.　　Striped suits also appear to have some folds, but from the thick black on the big eyebrows can be seen some of the past scenery.　　Prosecutors accuse Longchang of Ninhongsheng technology chairman, together with its two subsidiaries Acer International, Amman electronics suspected evasion, false capital investment, flight.　　In the face of prosecution charges, Longchang not alarmed, denied the above 3 counts, and in the next 5.5-hour trial process, showing a very peaceful, but the public prosecutor's various evidence of the population to do a rebuttal, attitude rashness. Morning according to the procedure by the presiding judge to check the parties, announcing the case, declaring the trial personnel, and so on, the prosecution alleges that Longchang involved in the false investment, the withdrawal of funds is in the process of registering the company, in violation of the provisions of the corporation law, the false contribution of RMB 50 million yuan, after the establishment of the company and the withdrawal of capital funds 15 million;　　Longchang with listed companies and its two subsidiaries to the bank to provide forged bills of lading, resulting in foreign exchange of more than 480 million U.S. dollars.　　Whether evasion into the focus of the debate in the afternoon, mainly on the evasion, the prosecution and the defendants made their respective statements.　　The evidence cited by the prosecution is mainly the statements made by various stakeholders after the incident, including the 5 groups of employees who have worked in Hongsheng technology, CITIC Insurance, logistics companies and banks. From these five sets of testimonies, Hongsheng technology together with the above two subsidiaries in Shanghai Bank, Bank of China, Bank of Communications, Citic Bank, 4 banks to open an import letter of credit, used to Hong Kong International Group Limited (hereinafter referred to as "Long international") procurement of electronic products sold to the U.S. traders IRC, int and other companies , the above letter of credit is by the Chinese export Credit insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as "CITIC Insurance") as a guarantee。　　From January 2005 to December 2006, Longchang-Long international gave 4 issuing banks 407 single bills of lading to be used for the acceptance of L/C, but 104 of the letters of credit expired were not paid. In the meantime, the key elements of the testimony include: the Supplier long International in 03 to 15 million of the low price transfer to the Taiwanese natural Zhang Shujian (sound similar). According to court information, the turnover amounted to HK $3.9 billion in 04, net profit of HK $100 million; Dragon International and Hongsheng Technology although the form of independent, but from ordering to pricing, transportation, etc. are controlled by Longchang; IRC, int of the chairman of the Dragon longevity of the sister Dragon Changhong; Long International Sale of goods has been fake　　, Non-delivery did not check out the phenomenon; IRC company involved in intellectual property disputes, the establishment of a new company and become a new distributor of Hongsheng technology; Amman Electronics, Acer International is actually by Hongsheng Science and Technology unified management, is two teams, a set of men; 407 bills of lading are issued under the Longchang's prompt and so on.　　The defendants questioned the prosecution's testimony, and the 4 defendants hired 6 lawyers as well as Longchang himself, Acer Sheng Technology's acting chairman Hussec, Acer International's deputy Wu Chonglin, Amman Electronic legal representative Tao Zhengde to the above point of view one by one retort. Their views include: first of all, because the witnesses used a lot of "I think, should be" and other subjective words, therefore, the record of the witness lack of high credibility, and secondly, IRC, Int's chairman who is not directly related to the evasion; there is only one case of unqualified products in Hongsheng, The time of this case (from January 2005 to December 2006), Citic Insurance has a comprehensive track of the goods; whether the 407 bills of lading are all false and not in writing, the bill of lading issued by the company is not passed through Shanghai, and it is sent directly from Hong Kong to the United States because of the time delay caused by repeated inspections by the Government and the customs.　　In order to ensure normal delivery, the dragon is only a direct part of the goods from Hong Kong to send to the United States, the company issued a false bill of lading is the director Longchang or Shen Zhenan, in the end is who. At present, the above-mentioned cases are still pending, this newspaper will continue to follow the report.