Top three of the country's affluent regions in Suzhou, Dongguan Karamay

China Economic Network Beijing December 16 (reporter Cao Wei) county-level Economic Research Institute in the recent completion of the third National State Alliance of the relative affluence and overall development monitoring and evaluation report, and draw a new version of the "National City of the state union relative wealth Map", the report is still the sole responsibility of the China economic network to start.　　China Economic network reporter learned that the report of the third national relatively rich region list, the national prosperity and progress of the country's list of provinces and cities, the relative richness of the monitoring evaluation results also revealed.　　The relative disparity has narrowed the difference of the relative richness of the state Union of the national cities and counties can be measured by their extreme difference (maximum and minimum difference), Extreme difference ratio (maximum and minimum difference ratio), difference coefficient and so on. The third report devoted a special study to the regional development gap in the country.　　The report pointed out that the national region of two yuan and rich and poor ratio of 1.79, four yuan rich and poor ratio of 2.71, East-Middle-west-northeast four regions of the four areas of the rich and poor ratio of 1.82, the reporter found that the above data than the previous two continue to shrink. China Economic network reporter learned from the report, the National Union of the relative affluence of the state has shown a "relatively narrow gap" situation.　　The ratio of the 10% cities with the highest relative affluence to the lowest 10% was narrowed from the previous 3.42 to 3.24, and the relative affluence of the relatively developed region (a +) and the relatively backward area B was reduced from the previous 2.62 to 2.53.　　China Economic network data show that the national City of the state Union has 318 (end of 2008), of which 268 cities, 17 regions, 30 Autonomous Prefecture, the league 3, excluding 19 municipalities and deputy ministerial city. According to the reporter understand, the report will be the National Union of the relative richness of the degree according to the size of four grades, including A + (>125) 42, accounting for 13.21%, and the previous flat; A-level (125~100) 53, accounting for 16.67%, with the last flat; A-level (100~75) 119, accounting for 37.42%, 4 more than the last; B-Class (﹤75) 104, accounting for 32.7%, less than the last 4; the relative affluence of the National City Union has narrowed, but the absolute gap is still very large, most of the city of the state union's relative affluence in the number of lines 85, below the average line 93　　, and lower than the national average of 100, the relative affluence of the national City of the state Union "averages do not represent the majority". The developed regions are distributed in the network. The third national relatively rich degree of the first 10 areas are: Guangdong Dongguan, Xinjiang Karamay, Suzhou City, Guangdong, Foshan City, Jiangsu, Wuxi City, Guangdong Zhuhai, Guangdong Zhongshan, Zhejiang Zhoushan, Zhejiang Wenzhou, Jiangsu Changzhou, the top 10 list unchanged,　　　　Slight fluctuations occurred in individual precedence.　　China Economic network reporter from the National City of the state union relative affluence map found that the relatively developed areas in the eastern coastal region of the network distribution, in other regions are dotted distribution. AllRelatively rich areas of the country is the county's prosperity index for a +-class Ⅰ, a total of 42, with the last flat, accounting for the total of 13.21%, the population of 164 million, accounting for the national total population of the State Union 14.85%. Of these, only the eastern coastal region accounted for 59.52% of the total. The specific distribution is as follows: 25 in the East, 6 in the central region, 8 in the western Region and 3 in the Northeast region; in the province urban distribution is: Anhui 3, Fujian 2, 1 Gansu, Guangdong 5, Hebei 1, Henan 1, Heilongjiang 1, Hunan 1, Jiangsu 5, Liaoning 2, 5 in Inner Mongolia, Shandong 5, Shanxi 1, Xinjiang 2, Zhejiang 7, the progress of the western region is obviously based on the change of the relative affluence of the region, the report will choose the region with the largest increase in the prosperity index of the county, as the country's rich and prosperous (China-county Prosperity Index) Progress area, a total of 30, the Midwest region as many as 19,　　Accounted for 63.33% of the total.　　The third national powerful country rich and enriching (the County Prosperity Index) The progress region in the province urban area distribution is: Anhui 1, Fujian 1, Guangxi 4, Hebei 1, Heilongjiang 1, Jilin 2, Liaoning 1, Nei Mongol 2, Ningxia 1, Shandong 2, Shanxi 2, Sichuan 4, 5 Shaanxi, Xinjiang 2, Yunnan 1. Relative affluence and industrial structure are similar to the previous evaluation methods, the relative affluence of the region is based on the national average level as the reference coordinates, a comprehensive survey of residents income, consumption, savings, basic public services, economic development and financial regulatory capacity. "It should be more comprehensive than simply using per capita GDP to measure affluence, because the relative richness of the region includes not only the current year's increment but also the multi-year stock," said Liu Fugang, director of the county.　　"The reporter learned that the third report on the National provinces and cities in the ranking of relative affluence and the ranking of GDP per capita, compared the ranking of urban and the province of the rich and powerful equivalent of the order of the GDP and the comparison table can be seen in some provinces the ranking of the two more obvious differences. Liu Fugang said that the previous regional development gap is generally compared with GDP per capita, urban-rural disparity is generally compared with urban and rural residents income. Now, a new measure of regional development can be measured by the relative affluence of the region. The relative affluence of the region is to take the national average level as the reference coordinate, comprehensively inspects the inhabitant income, the consumption, the savings, the basic public service, the economic development and the financial control ability and so on. From the comparison between the ranking of relative affluence and the ranking of GDP per capita in the third national provinces and cities, we can see that there are obvious differences in the ranking of individual provinces, which is related to the regional economic industrial structure, historical wealth accumulation and other factors.