Travel tax draft for 50,000 views

October 29, the National People's Congress office to the full text of the general public to publish travel tax law, widely solicited views and suggestions.　　Although the deadline for collection is November 30, 2010, there are still one months to go, but the public's concern about this bill is very high: as of 8 o'clock November 1, the National People's Congress official website shows that "the number of views" has reached 48,998, which undoubtedly proves that many of the draft travel tax "have something to say." In the reporter's opinion, the travel tax in the end how to levy is related to tens of millions of car family big problem, need in the democratic, scientific atmosphere fully absorb public opinion.　　The most important thing is that the travel tax, as one of the many taxes related to automobiles, needs to be comprehensively considered and to plan its legislative direction and tax fluctuation under the background of China's automobile tax reform. The four major disputes over the draft travel tax 1 on the basis of displacement does not fully reflect the nature of property tax by displacement not fully reflect the nature of property tax, which is also a number of members of the NPC Standing Committee to raise objections. The central point is that if the vehicle-travel tax is the concept of a property tax, it should be levied on the value of the car.　　Because according to the concept of property tax, the amount of revenue should be accounted for by the amount of property.　　Uzhtu, a member of the NPC Standing Committee, for example, now according to the exhaust operation is not fair, such as the displacement of the same 3.0L sedan, the domestic red flag prosperity sedan value of more than 300,000 yuan, joint venture Audi more than 700,000 yuan, 700,000 of the property and 300,000 of the property of a year to pay the same tax is obviously unreasonable But the Treasury's explanation for this is that "the number of vehicles and vehicles is large and scattered in thousands of households, and valuation is difficult to operate."　　"2 according to the discharge grade levy can energy saving and emission reduction?" According to the discharge of grade levy can really achieve the purpose of promoting energy saving and emission reduction. The opinion of Jinmodong, a member of the NPC Standing Committee, is that the size of passenger cars is not the only standard for determining whether it is environmental protection, and many advanced technology applications have enabled some large emitters to reduce emissions.　　It is right to reduce or exempt from travel tax on energy saving and travel, but high energy consumption, high pollution should be strictly prohibited to use, can not be adjusted by tax, should not encourage the use of tax to replace the right to discharge.　　The Ministry of Finance explained that, after analysis, it was still believed that, considering the motor vehicle emissions and its value in general there is a positive correlation, in order to facilitate the collection and administration, the draft will be the amount of exhaust emissions as a counting basis for taxation.　　3 is the increase in travel tax too large? Whether the increase in travel tax is too large. Fan members think that if the bill is passed, 1.6 litres of exhaust emissions above the vehicle owners, the burden of car tax increases by 0.5 times times to 9 times times.　　The draft stipulates that a small vehicle will pay a tax of 360 yuan a year, and the maximum displacement vehicle annual tax to 5400 yuan (now 600 yuan for travel tax), increase tax is to add to this range? The reason is that, in terms of quantity, excluding 3% of luxury cars, more than 90% of the passenger cars are private cars, most of the displacement concentrated in 1.0l-2.0l. While the 1.0L and the following displacement models are not adjustedWhole, but throughout the auto consumer market, this displacement model is numbered.　　Therefore, the tax is generally improved. Compared to the Committee's objections, on the internet, more car owners are not taboo to point out that the increase in the levy of travel tax is "disguised tax increase".　　Some people even counted the accounts to support the view that the national travel tax would increase by billions of per year after the implementation of the draft provisions.　　4 is the draft widely consulted? Whether the draft law has been drafted has been widely solicited, and this is one of the most widely contested claims.　　More people think that, although the draft law on travel tax, mentioned in the bill, 30 Central Ministries, 10 local governments, 6 related industries and enterprises, but ignored the tax revenue of the most important and most direct stakeholders-the majority of owners, owners of the views. The radical point of view is that this selective view of the advice, so that the draft law brought a strong sectoral interest color.　　Some people even think that the draft of the majority of owners, owners of the lack of hearing, but also indirectly caused the public hot debate. So far, the controversy continues.　　Relevant expert analysis, at the end of October this is only the first consideration, from a lot of controversy and the relevant review process, just to the draft of the law has left more time for the argument, consideration, because the possibility of the introduction of the year is not big. Analysis: The draft is not scientific enough to be unfair even with the banner of energy saving and emission reduction, the draft of the travel tax chooses to divide the amount of the cut by the displacement is not scientific enough, easily from the property tax to "displacement tax".　　As for the traditional internal combustion engine cars, currently, turbo-pressurized, variable intake technology has been widely used in automotive engines. In other words, the inevitable correlation between the energy-saving emission reduction and the displacement of automobiles is greatly reduced.　　A 1.6-liter engine with natural air intake is not necessarily more energy efficient than a 1.8T or 2.0T model using turbo-charged technology.　　And from the property tax itself should be around the value of equity measurement, the "emission tax" levy method is unfair. For example, a Passat 2.0-liter model is cheaper than the 1.8T model, paying a higher travel tax, which is reasonable?　　Can it reflect the fairness of property taxes? In addition, the travel tax once the legislation, it means that the owner of the statutory obligations and rights.　　And at present, Beijing and other place to implement the vehicle tail limit line, 365 days a year calculation, the average private car owners to open more than 50 days a year, and the limit of the number of days travel tax relief is not reflected in the draft. Reality: Car taxes are already high. How much tax does a Chinese car family have to pay to buy a car? Data show that, if the vehicle is imported, the displacement of 3.0 liters or more, it is necessary to pay 25% of the import tariff, the displacement of 3.0 liters above the model levy 25% consumption tax, consumers buy when buying about 9% of the purchase tax. Among them, the tariff and excise tax is included in the price of the tax, the purchase tax is outside the car price tax. If it is to buy a domestic car, enterprises in the production process to pay 17%VAT and a 5% excise tax.　　After the vehicle is listed for sale, the purchaser must also pay about 9% of the purchase tax. In the United States, most states impose a 5%-10% tax on car companies, and there is no purchase tax at the end of the process. In Japan, the average tax rate for cars is about 11%, while Germany is 7%. In addition to China's holding links to travel tax, comparison can be found that China's car families in the purchase link and the holding of the tax in the world is also named sizable, which is not conducive to stimulating consumption, stimulating domestic demand.　　On the contrary, we are in the use of the link tax is low, energy-saving emission reduction of the most equitable, most effective link is weak. October 25, the NPC Standing Committee for the first time to consider the draft travel law. It is reported that this is the first time the highest national legislature for local tax legislation.　　October 29, the National People's Congress office in the Chinese People's network published the full text of the PRC travel Tax Law (draft), to the community to solicit opinions.　　The draft stipulates that the passenger car will be based on the size of the engine exhaust to levy a travel tax, the 1.6-liter and below passenger cars, the tax will be reduced or remain unchanged, more than 1.6 litres of vehicle travel tax range will be increased to varying degrees. Proposal: Travel tax can be merged into fuel tax in fact, travel tax in the final analysis is an annual collection of tax. Although the draft is divided into more detailed grades, reflecting the energy-saving emission reduction, guide the direction of consumption, but the nature of the travel tax to determine its scientific guidance in the consumption of the potential is not very large.　　In the end, the increase in the price of travel tax may breed a "road maintenance" mentality: Anyway, every year so some money is paid, "do not open the white, more open than less open cost-effective." According to the reporter, based on this, in the long run, from the experience of automotive developed countries, travel tax should be compressed or simply merged into the fuel tax. For example, the United States and Britain and other developed countries also attaches great importance to the use of private car tax, but are not fixed tax, and mainly through fuel tax to achieve "more open more pay, less open less pay" adjustment function.　　This approach will directly lead to the people's wallet and the car's energy-saving characteristics and vehicle frequency, mileage linked to the travel tax will play a greater and more scientific energy saving and emission reduction role. At the same time, the reporter thinks our country's automobile tax system should reduce the purchase, maintains the link the tax burden, enhances the use link the tax burden, lets the more open more tax, the less opens the tax less the idea to be popular, lets the more intelligent tax system to replace the temporary financial subsidy means. But also should be collected on the use of tax, supervision and other provisions, so that owners know where they pay the tax.　　In short, comprehensive consideration, the price of travel tax is outdated, is not conducive to the next step in the further reform of the car tax system. This edition synthesizes "Beijing Evening News" "Jiangnan Times"