What would happen if the rich were given money to the poor?

So we extend it ~ ~ ~ Do you think the rich just bank card number bigger than you? If it's just money, cash + deposits, it's easy to be rich and poor.

But the reality is obviously not so. Well, we're counting assets, like stocks, securities, real estate. It's all quantified.

Wait, the rich only have assets? No, in addition to assets and liabilities, this is one of the biggest differences between monopoly and reality. You see, a rich man has 10 million long-term claims, the annual income of 17%, envious it, but you do not know that the 10 million long-term debt corresponds to his 10 million short-term low interest rates, he is only to earn a bad interest, but also to bear the risk of default between long and short-term debt. You see he's got a hotel that returns millions of a year, but do you know him? The right to profit for the next few years has been mortgaged out into another loan to invest in other projects in another company under his name. You see he has a big stock of a company, but you don't see the betting agreement he signed with the investment agency, and if the stock doesn't go into a standard for the next few years, then the shares will be repossessed by investors at a low price. You see his company getting a huge investment, overnight, but you do not know that one of the conditions of investment is he himself in the next few years must continue to work for the company, can not change his job elsewhere, because the investors themselves are not looking at the assets themselves but the management team's ability and quality. So the question is, his "assets" are divided between you and his "debt" and "responsibility" for these assets? How to score?

There are a lot of similar examples, so what am I going to say?

The rich are not a simple "money more" concept, in many cases, "more money" is only a result. The real wealth planning and distribution of the rich is a complex combination, different industries, capital support each other, coupled with the ability of individuals, contacts, plus a lot of intangible assets: such as the brand effect, long-term accumulation of personal reputation, and so on, and so on, and so on, together to build his wealth empire, which is actually interlocking, If you break any of the rings, you may be able to pull the whole body.

So what happens when the wealth is fragmented? It is certainly not a good result, and it is difficult for individuals to be divided into any part of it to maintain the return on the part of "wealth" as a whole. This social immutable business law is actually the Matthew effect, wealth-tangible or intangible-the more concentrated, the more can create greater wealth.

A deck of playing cards can create a lot of interesting ways to play, and if 52 people get one, I can't think of anything more than a bookmark.