Will "common application" replace "anchor text"?

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

This period of time, in the vast number of webmaster circles are circulating such a statement, that is "Common application" will replace the "anchor text", and also said that the official Google statement, and spread more and more widely, really have such a thing? To tell you the truth, I've tried to do it with a common reference after I know it. But perhaps I am not enough to adhere to, the effect is not a special ideal, but if the effect, it is still some! But will replace the anchor text, small weave feeling is not likely!

First, take a look at what a common reference is:

As the figure shows: if an article in Site A and a post in Site B is quoted from Site C, the article in site A says: "So the view has to talk about the content of Site C." "Then the Site C this quoted article will also have the effect of SEO."

In fact, is the kind of "articles reproduced in", "* * * Report (Introduction)" And so on this kind of expression of relevance, sometimes may be left behind a text link, sometimes may be simply left a website name, there are many kinds of forms, but for the operation of common application, it is important is highly correlated, which means that, to keep this link, you need to prepare another 2 or more articles related to it, which is a lot of work!

Look at the anchor text again:

This is the best form of the chain that the Webmaster friends recognize. The effect is also very good, many, is also ranked a major factor, which led to the purchase and sale of links, such as the chain of garbage more and more, in response to this situation, search engines are no way to deal with, although Baidu's Green Luo algorithm, Google's panda algorithm is aimed at the outside of the chain of garbage, buy and sell links, but is not very mature, but also need continuous improvement, this requires a certain process, if from this aspect, the common reference to replace the anchor text is indeed a very good way, but the search engine will do it?

Small part of the view, "Common application" alternative "anchor text" for the time being can not be achieved, in the future may be difficult to say:

One, now Baidu in the calculation of the chain, the pure text is also an outside chain, at the same time, in the article related to the judgment above the technology is increasingly mature, but the most influential or outside the chain, even if you do the common application, in other places left their own information, in fact, or did a chain, in the calculation, or according to a chain of calculation, common application to do more, the equivalent is to do more outside the chain, who really played a role, it is difficult to judge!

Second, from Baidu, Google's algorithm upgrade time and again, we can see, now the main target or outside the chain, in fact, all search engine rankings affect the most factors or a few, content, density, vote, for the chain of adjustments we can see, now the outside chain or mainstream, In a short period of time to make major adjustments in technology and other aspects of the need for continuous improvement!

Third, the source: has been said that "common application" will replace the "anchor text" is Google's official claim, in fact, Google did not say so, and there is no "common application" this concept, perhaps only Chinese webmaster from their words in which to create the word! Relevance is really important, but completely changed, It's hard to be sure!

In the final analysis, "Common Application", "anchor text" In fact, there is no conflict, not can not exist at the same time, as the algorithm is upgraded, may also be the two aspects of the combination of consideration, in fact, as long as we really do "natural", as Google Senior software engineer Zhu Jianfei said: " Natural link "is the best link, to do the nature, why should we care about his form?"

Small make up my humble opinion, big God don't spray!