Rovio response to Wall Street Journal Peek Private report says its facts are unclear

In the face of The Wall Street Journal's allegations of "collecting and leaking users ' personal information," The Angry bird Developer, Finnish Rovio, said in an urgent response to "No such thing", according to foreign media reports. "Angry Birds do not collect or store individual personal information in any situation, and the Wall Street Journal reports are vague and deliberately inciting users to distrust them." A spokesman for the Rovio company said they had nothing to do with the so-called "advertisers" in the report, "We will never use our games for advertising." A spokesman for Rovio said the company had only two sources and applications for transmitting user data, but it had nothing to do with the so-called "advertising business". "We use the crystal Social gaming platform and Flurry analytics software to transmit the user data for Angry Birds," he said. "The crystal social gaming platform itself will not keep any personal information, but in the Wall Street Journal's report there is no clear explanation for this expertise." "The Flurry analysis software only collects the total number of users of play games in different countries and does not involve any personal information," said a spokesman for the Rovio company. "The Wall Street Journal published a survey reported that, including Rovio" Angry Birds ", Bao Kai" gem bejeweled 2 "and so on the best-selling phone games have different degrees of" collection of user personal privacy information, and leaked to the third party to share "malicious behavior.